There's a difference between "Women Are Wonderful" bias and "Women should be wonderful to me" bias.
The women-are-wonderful effect is the tendency to evaluate women more positively than men overall, especially by associating women with traits like warmth, kindness, nurturance, empathy, helpfulness, and moral goodness. If someone truly believed women generally these things, then being decent to women would feel like the natural response to that belief. You would think, “Women are people worth treating well”.
However, that’s not what’s seen when the topic of “Women Are Wonderful bias” gets brought up in this subreddit as an origin story to the redpill. It’s usually hoping that romance or sex as the end result. You do not have to want someone romantically to be respectful. You do not have to be sexually interested in someone to be considerate. You do not have to expect a relationship to be a decent person. If a guy felt women are wonderful, he should want to show most women kindness, generosity, etc, not just the women they find attractive.
Hence, I coined the “women should be wonderful to me” bias. It’s about wanting stereotypical feminine qualities for one’s own benefit.
The attitude is basically:
- “Women are nurturing, so they should nurture me.”
- “Women are patient, so they should tolerate my flaws, excuses, and lack of effort.”
- “Women are empathetic, so they should understand me, forgive me, and accommodate me.”
I’ve heard men say their “women are wonderful” bias started with their mothers, and honestly, I think that explains part of the problem. Because in many cases, they were not raised to admire women as full human beings. They were raised experiencing women, especially mothers, as sources of comfort, forgiveness, patience, praise, nurturing, and emotional labor. So they are not really trying to “bask in the radiance of these perfect beings,” as the bias might imply. They want the emotional benefits of a mother in a romantic partner. Someone who gives, gives, gives, and expects very little in return. Someone who nurtures them, forgives them, understands them, accommodates them, praises basic effort, and keeps loving them even when they are difficult.
Also, there is a stage of maturity where you are supposed to learn that you do good things because they are the right thing to do, not because you expect payment for them. Now, expecting mutual good treatment is fair. If you are kind to someone, it is reasonable to want kindness back. If you respect someone, it is reasonable to want respect back. If you show consideration, it is reasonable to want consideration in return. Expecting romance and sex as a reward is NOT REASONABLE.
So it seems the bitter (red)pill to swallow wasnt that women can be bad people like men.... it's women arent inherently responsible for soothing, rewarding, and validating men...like men aren't.