u/KyleMCarthage

Screw it Pt11: Colgates your Sombron

Screw it Pt11: Colgates your Sombron

This was probably the hardest one out of all my silly little edits as I had to both figure out how I would recolor Sombron (was planning on just using Lumera, but then threw in Alear's colors ) in addition to spending time removing the flames (which you can clearly tell I somewhat gave up on near the end). Even then, I'm honestly not the happiest with how it turned out, but I had to commit to the bit once I started.

I also tried giving him the :D, but I couldn't really get it to work well with Majiji's artstyle.

Anyway, until next time where Alear gets another alt

u/KyleMCarthage — 15 hours ago

How exactly does Faunus racism work in Remnant?

This may sound like a stupid question to ask because racism and other forms of bigotry at its core is fundamentally illogical and so trying to conceptualize irrationality seems like a moot point, but at the same time, given that racism is somewhat important to the narrative of RWBY to warrant a plotline about it, I think it's worth asking.

Now I'm not asking for a whole history lesson on it (though world of remnant would have been the ideal place for it) nor does a story need to deeply explain its racism to explain why it's bad (i.e. static shock's sins of the father and Teen Titan's Troq) to get its point across, but to know the why in how such discrimination occurs does help when trying to write a narrative where one of your central main characters is trying to make a world not racist against her people as otherwise you just have people preaching to the choir to not be a dick.

Cause from what we see in the show, Faunus racism comes down them being treated as lesser than human via overt discrimination, instances of them barring Faunus in some establishments, slave labor that seems to have also evolved into unsafe labor that's taken on by Faunus, and having them live on an island far removed from the main kingdoms to the point where Faunus have to hide their identities or join up with the white fang which then promotes another level of anti-Faunus sentiment. However, none of these forms of discrimination makes sense because they're drawing from discrimination of different groups which muddles the question of how their racism actually works.

Note: the examples I'm providing are American with an American perspective. I recognize that racism comes in all shapes and sizes and differs throughout the world. However, as an American, these are what I'm familiar so I apologize if I don't know of examples beyond of what I learned in my education system. That said, given that the defunct RT was an American company and Miles and Kerry are also Americans, I feel it's worth using as these examples in history likely influenced how they wrote the Faunus racism.

  • The slave labor turned low waged workers is reminiscent of African Americans who historically were enslaved and traded across the trans Atlantic. Then when they freed, they were still historically in poorer conditions and faced discrimination until the Civil rights movement that demanded equality in the eyes of the law in things like voting, but that doesn't mean that racism is gone as society is still structured that way. This is likely the main inspiration given the Faunus also had a civil rights movement and how there was also a Great war of 2 opposing sides.
  • The hiding of traits to conceal their identities is very reminiscent of Jewish antisemitism where the cultural identities of these people had to be hidden in order to avoid direct confrontation with opposing viewpoints, but also has elements of McCarthyism on the side of the humans who may suspect people of being Faunus
  • The forced migration of these groups to a more favored environment is reminiscent of Native American tribes who were forced off their lands by colonizers onto reservations given that the only recognized Faunus land is Menagerie, though it could also be a read into the housing of Blacks into impoverish neighborhoods
  • The White Fang's actions breeding anti Faunus sentiment is reminiscent of anti Muslim sentiment following 9/11 as an act of terrorism.

Sure the end result is "I don't like this other group cause it ain't me and so I'm gonna be a bigot to them" hence the discrimination, but it misses out the nuance that racism is different between different groups and ultimately is kinda racist in of itself to assume that bigotry is the same just because the outward expression of it is the same.

I'd also like to note that this isn't even scratching the surface of how racism is actually a class issue where how it's used to propagate incorrect assumptions of racial superiority amongst other problems, but that makes a simple question of how it works too long.

reddit.com
u/KyleMCarthage — 3 days ago

Technically KuroTrash started work near the end of December of last year on this voice bank, but I haven't seen it being talked about here and only really noticing it following a....scuffle?(I think that'd be putting it too lightly) about it on Twitter/Bird website where Hioka himself ended up making a statement when he got roped into it.

Admittedly said model isn't finished and KuroTrash is going to take their time on finishing it, but I felt like it'd be worth mentioning as it's something Neru related to look forward with KuroTrash also looking to also give it a new design (yay, more Neru outfits).

Also if I can use this opportunity to be a bit more serious, I think this would also be a good opportunity to show KuroTrash some support as based on their socials, their birthday also occurred around the time when their needed to seemingly be accountable for how they sourced their voicebank. While I understand that they did an objectively wrong thing with how they made their original NEO VB, hence the skepticism, it's a poor practice to accuse without proof. I'll end it off with a quote from Hioka on this kinda of behavior

>even if there were issues with the earlier version 1.0, and the restrictions in multiple subreddits were based on that, I do not see a reason to change my current position at this time unless specific problems with the current voicebank—the actual subject of concern—are clearly identified.

>Finally, while I believe that expressing concerns is entirely valid, I do not think it is appropriate to place the full burden of disproving those concerns on the creator of the voicebank. If that kind of approach becomes the standard, then any creative work—not just voicebanks—could be judged as “suspicious” without sufficient grounds, which would not be a fair structure.

>Although this situation does not seem to have resulted in serious consequences, I would like to clarify in advance that, in order to maintain fair discussions in the future, raising concerns should be accompanied by objective evidence or explanations based on verifiable facts, rather than speculation

Source

u/KyleMCarthage — 15 days ago