u/JoshuaSimmonsWolf478

Here are some ways to describe the scale:

• About 160 square kilometers
• About 39,700 acres
• Roughly 2.7x the size of Manhattan
• Almost 4 San Franciscos
• About 30,000 football fields
• About 640,000 tennis courts
• About 60,600 Olympic swimming pools laid flat
• Larger than many entire mining districts at early exploration stage
• Roughly the distance of a medium-sized city spread across a major copper belt

And the important part is that this land package sits only about 10 km, around 6 miles, west of Hudbay Minerals’ Copper Mountain Mine in British Columbia.

That scale matters because porphyry systems are often district-scale systems, not tiny single-zone discoveries. Having 16,078 hectares gives NovaRed room for:

• North Lamont
• West Lamont
• Wilmac
• Plume
• Additional unexplored targets
• Future geophysical expansion
• Multiple intrusive centers and pipe-like targets

The latest interpretation already outlined:

• 2 interpreted intrusive centers
• Multiple pipe-like porphyry features
• AMT penetration to around 1,500 meters
• Copper-in-soil up to 1,125 ppm Cu
• Chargeability anomalies
• Conductivity/resistivity structures

So the story is starting to look much larger than “one copper anomaly.”

It is becoming a district-scale copper-gold exploration system with room for multiple targets across an enormous land package.

Here are some ways to describe the scale:

• About 160 square kilometers
• About 39,700 acres
• Roughly 2.7x the size of Manhattan
• Almost 4 San Franciscos
• About 30,000 football fields
• About 640,000 tennis courts
• About 60,600 Olympic swimming pools laid flat
• Larger than many entire mining districts at early exploration stage
• Roughly the distance of a medium-sized city spread across a major copper belt

And the important part is that this land package sits only about 10 km, around 6 miles, west of Hudbay Minerals’ Copper Mountain Mine in British Columbia.

That scale matters because porphyry systems are often district-scale systems, not tiny single-zone discoveries. Having 16,078 hectares gives NovaRed room for:

• North Lamont
• West Lamont
• Wilmac
• Plume
• Additional unexplored targets
• Future geophysical expansion
• Multiple intrusive centers and pipe-like targets

The latest interpretation already outlined:

• 2 interpreted intrusive centers
• Multiple pipe-like porphyry features
• AMT penetration to around 1,500 meters
• Copper-in-soil up to 1,125 ppm Cu
• Chargeability anomalies
• Conductivity/resistivity structures

So the story is starting to look much larger than “one copper anomaly.”

It is becoming a district-scale copper-gold exploration system with room for multiple targets across an enormous land package.

NovaRed Mining (CSE: NRED / OTCQB: NREDF) is one of those names that becomes more interesting the moment you zoom out from individual data points and look at the scale of the land position.

Wilmac covers about 39,700 acres (~62 square miles) in BC’s Quesnel porphyry belt. That is not a small claim block anymore, that is district-level ground. And it sits roughly 6 miles west of Copper Mountain Mine, which is already a producing copper system. That proximity alone gives geological context, even before you look at any assays.

What stands out to me is how early the exploration is still in terms of definition. North Lamont has only had a 43-sample soil program, with spacing around 115 to 130 feet and shallow sampling depths of about 6 to 12 inches. Copper values reached up to 379 ppm, with a consistent cluster averaging around 209 ppm in the western area.

This is still pre-drill ranking stage, which is important. They are not forcing conclusions yet, they are building target confidence.

Add in Gregory Fedun joining the advisory board, with 30+ years in capital markets and resource development, and it feels like the company is starting to think beyond just early sampling. MetalCore also adds a data angle that is unusual for a junior explorer.

The stock has already had a major move, around 3,000% over the past year, but the exploration system itself still looks like it is being assembled step by step.

This might sound controversial, but I think the Gregory Fedun appointment at $NRED is one of those things retail initially underestimates.

Not because he’s "famous" in the public sense.

Because mining works differently.

In tech:

• Elon Musk moves markets through narrative
• visibility
• retail attention
• vision

In commodities and mining:

• deals
• financing
• sovereign relationships
• institutional trust

often matter more than headlines.

That’s why I think the Fedun addition is interesting.

The guy has:

1. 30+ years in natural resources
2. mining + oil & gas experience
3. project financing background
4. cross-border transaction exposure
5. M&A and commercialization experience
6. relationships across North America, South America, Africa, and the Middle East

Then there’s the UAE angle.

He advised the Al Mualla Royal Family and reportedly worked around sovereign/family capital circles.

That is NOT typical for a $52M CAD junior explorer advisory board.

And the Anadarko connection matters too.

People forget how large Anadarko Petroleum was before the ~$55B Occidental acquisition.

Fedun participated in a $70M business combination involving Anadarko-related operations.

Again, this doesn’t mean a buyout is coming tomorrow.

But it DOES suggest experience around:

• resource transactions
• strategic structuring
• institutional negotiation environments
• partnership development

To me, that changes the lens slightly.

Because copper is no longer just a cyclical metal story.

Now it’s tied to:

• AI infrastructure
• data centers
• electrification
• military supply chains
• energy security
• allied resource independence

And at the exact same time:

• copper prices remain elevated
• Grasberg recovery delays continue
• inventories are tightening
• smelter economics are stressed
• long-term supply deficits keep getting discussed

So if you’re NovaRed management, adding someone who understands BOTH resources and capital markets actually makes strategic sense.

Especially for a company trying to advance a BC copper-gold project in a future supply-constrained environment.

Still early.
Still speculative.

But I think smart money often watches WHO enters a story before the broader market notices WHY they entered.

NFA

NovaRed Mining (NRED) just added Gregory Fedun to its advisory board, and I’ve been thinking about why these kinds of hires tend to matter more than they first appear.

On paper it is simple:
30+ years experience in natural resources, capital markets, and project development, plus exposure to global regions like Africa, South America, and the Middle East.

But what stands out is not the resume, it is timing and function.

This is not a production company or a mid-tier miner. This is still an early copper exploration story. So bringing in someone who has been involved in structured deals around the ~$70M range and cross-border advisory work signals something slightly different in mindset.

It suggests preparation for complexity.

And copper is one of those commodities where complexity comes fast if things start working:
permitting,
financing,
partners,
jurisdiction scaling.

Most juniors only think about the first layer. The stronger ones quietly start building the second layer before they need it.

What I find interesting here is that NovaRed is not just adding “industry credibility”. The announcement specifically ties Fedun to:
development pathways,
strategic partnerships,
capital markets strategy.

That combination is usually where early exploration stories start to evolve into something more structured.

It does not mean anything is guaranteed, but it changes how you read the company trajectory.

Especially in a copper environment where long-term demand pressure from electrification and AI infrastructure keeps tightening the importance of future supply.

Feels like early positioning for optionality rather than just exploration execution.

Curious if anyone else sees this kind of hire as a structural signal or just standard junior mining PR.

Not advice, NFA

What I like about NovaRed Mining right now is that it doesn’t feel like a rushed story. It feels like a company that is slowly putting pieces in place before the market fully catches up.

They are sitting on a land package that’s now around 16,000 hectares in British Columbia, which already puts them in a different category compared to the typical early-stage explorer that is still working with tiny, disconnected claims. In copper exploration, scale matters because porphyry systems don’t usually show up in small isolated pockets. You either get a system or you don’t, and having enough ground to actually capture that system is step one.

But what makes this more interesting is not just size, it’s how they are approaching it. Instead of just announcing new ground and leaving it at that, they’ve been actively layering historical geophysical and geochemical data with newer interpretations. That kind of work doesn’t create headlines, but it does quietly improve how future drilling decisions are made.

They also added additional tenure like Plume, which helps connect parts of the geological picture. When you start seeing continuity between zones instead of isolated targets, it usually means the exploration model is becoming more refined. That is important because early drilling success often depends more on targeting than anything else.

From a market perspective, NovaRed is still relatively small in valuation terms compared to what a confirmed copper discovery could eventually justify. That gap between current pricing and potential outcome is exactly what makes this stage interesting. The market is not pricing production, it’s pricing possibility.

And copper itself is still in a strong long-term demand environment. Electrification, infrastructure, and grid expansion all point toward higher structural consumption over time. That doesn’t guarantee success for any individual company, but it does support the idea that new supply will be valued if it is discovered.

What stands out most to me is the pacing. There is no rush, just steady progression toward a drilling phase. And in junior mining, that phase is where everything usually starts to become much clearer.

Curious how others are viewing this kind of slow build approach. Do you prefer early structured development like this, or only step in once drilling starts confirming things?

NFA.

A few weeks ago I had one of those days where everything just felt off.

Nothing dramatic, just that quiet frustration. Bills stacking up, work feeling repetitive, checking my account and thinking “I’m doing everything right, so why does it still feel like I’m behind?”

I ended up staying up late that night, just scrolling, not really looking for anything specific. Mostly finance stuff, people talking about side hustles, investing, trying to get ahead.

Same conversations over and over.

At some point I clicked into a thread about AI and energy use. I don’t even know why, I wasn’t that interested. But people were arguing about how much power data centers are going to need in the next 5 to 10 years.

Numbers were being thrown around that honestly didn’t make much sense to me at first.

Then someone asked a really simple question in the middle of it:

“If everything is going electric, where do all the materials come from?”

That kind of stuck with me.

I realized I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about apps, platforms, stocks, basically the top layer of everything. But I’ve never really thought about what’s underneath it all.

So I started looking into it. Not seriously, just curiosity.

And one thing kept coming up again and again: copper.

It’s in everything. Power grids, EVs, infrastructure, basically anything that moves electricity. And the weird part is, no one really talks about it outside of niche spaces.

That’s where it started to get interesting.

I went from reading random comments to actually looking at companies, just to understand how new supply even works.

That’s how I came across NovaRed Mining (CSE: NRED / OTC: NREDF).

At first I almost ignored it. Small company, early stage, nothing obvious to grab onto.

But I kept reading.

They’re working in British Columbia, which from what I could tell is a pretty established mining area. Not some random place, but a region where copper has already been found and mined.

Then I saw they’re not just looking at one small spot. It’s a much larger land package, thousands of hectares, and they’ve been expanding it over time.

That part made me pause.

Because it wasn’t just “we hope something is here”. It looked more like they’re trying to understand a bigger system.

I also noticed they’re using a mix of traditional methods and newer tools, like data analysis and even AI to help identify targets. That surprised me a bit. I always thought mining was very old-school.

The more I read, the more it stopped feeling like random speculation and more like a process.

Not a guaranteed outcome, but at least something structured.

I didn’t suddenly become an expert or anything like that.

But it did change how I think about all this.

Instead of just looking at stocks as numbers on a screen, I started thinking more about what they actually represent in the real world.

Like, what’s physically there, what problem it’s solving, where it fits in the bigger picture.

Now when I hear people talk about AI, energy, or infrastructure, I can’t help but think about the layer underneath all of it.

And it’s kind of weird because a month ago I wasn’t even paying attention to this space.

Curious if anyone else has gone down a similar rabbit hole recently.

Not financial advice.

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

Most people think the real upside in junior mining only comes after a discovery hole. That’s actually not how the market usually works.

There is a phase before discovery that tends to get overlooked, but historically it’s where the first meaningful re-rating happens. That phase is confirmation.

Right now, NRED is sitting right in that zone.

Let’s break it down in simple terms.

At the earliest stage, when a company only has surface data and regional targeting, the market assigns a relatively low value because uncertainty is extremely high. In BC copper-gold systems, that usually means something like $5M to $30M CAD EV.

Then comes geophysics.

This is where things start to change. You’re no longer just guessing based on surface samples. You’re mapping what’s happening underground - structure, chargeability, depth potential.

When that data lines up, the project moves into a different category entirely.

Historically, that shift pushes valuation into roughly $20M to $80M CAD, which is often a 2x to 4x expansion in how the same project is priced.

Notice something important here.

No drilling yet. No resource yet. No production.

Just better understanding.

That’s why I think the current setup for NRED is interesting. At around ~$52M CAD EV, it’s already leaning toward that second stage, but not fully priced as a confirmed system.

That creates a situation where the 2026 geophysics program is not just another update - it’s a classification event.

If results show coherent anomalies and define drill targets, the market doesn’t just react emotionally. It adjusts structurally, because the project now fits a different risk category.

And that matters because different pools of capital operate at different stages.

Some investors only step in once a project is drill-ready. Others wait for discovery. But the transition into “drill-ready” is when the investor base starts to expand.

That’s often when liquidity improves and valuation starts to stretch.

So while everyone waits for drilling in 2027+, the earlier step in 2026 might already do a lot of the heavy lifting.

Because in this space, value doesn’t only come from what you find.

It comes from how much uncertainty you remove.

The 50% tariff on non-CUSMA copper is the most significant trade policy shift in base metals since 2018. Canadian copper juniors with 500M-tonne targets are the exact assets that benefit.

The verdict is that CUSMA is now the most valuable trade agreement for copper investors. The 50% tariff on non-CUSMA imports created a two-tier market overnight.

Non-CUSMA copper into the U.S.: $4.50/lb base + 50% tariff = $6.75/lb. CUSMA copper: $4.50/lb base + 0% tariff = $4.50/lb. The spread is $2.25/lb and it is structural.

The mismatch is that most commodity investors have not repriced Canadian copper assets for this spread. They are still looking at copper as a global commodity with one price. The tariff created two prices.

NRED is on the watchlist because it is a pure play on the winning side. 11,504 ha in BC. CUSMA jurisdiction. 350-400 km from the border. Surface grades 0.639% Cu. A 500M-tonne target that, if confirmed, produces tariff-free copper into the tightest U.S. market in history.

The watchlist thesis: when the market realizes CUSMA copper is worth more than non-CUSMA copper, the repricing of Canadian juniors is sudden. NRED is one of the smallest EV names with one of the largest targets in the right jurisdiction.

Deserves attention here. NFA.

The more I look into the U.S. energy situation, the more it feels like we’re trying to run a 2028-level demand curve on infrastructure that was built decades ago.

And the numbers really put that into perspective.

Large transformers across North America are now sitting at around 38 to 40 years old, which is basically their full design life. At the same time, about 70% of transmission lines and transformers are already over 25 years old.

So this isn’t a modern system getting upgraded. It’s an aging system being pushed harder every year.

Now layer in demand.

Electricity demand in the U.S. is expected to increase:
About 1.2% in 2026
Then accelerate to 3.3% in 2027

That’s already a step up.

But the real pressure comes from AI and data centers.

Power consumption from data centers is projected to go from 176 TWh in 2023 to somewhere between 325 and 580 TWh by 2028.

That’s roughly:
74 GW to 132 GW of demand, or
6.7% to 12% of total U.S. electricity usage

That’s not just growth, that’s a structural shift in how energy is consumed.

So now you’ve got:
A grid at the end of its lifecycle
A demand curve that’s accelerating
New types of always-on, high-load consumption

That combination doesn’t resolve itself slowly.

It forces change.

And what’s interesting is that the conversation is already shifting toward solutions that don’t rely entirely on centralized infrastructure.

Microgrids, localized generation, storage systems, and smarter grid management are starting to move from “optional upgrades” to “necessary components.”

That’s where NextNRG (NXXT) starts to make more sense in the bigger picture.

Because if the system can’t be rebuilt fast enough at the national level, then decentralized solutions become the bridge.

From an investment perspective, this feels less like a cyclical trade and more like a forced rebuild cycle.

And those tend to last longer and go further than people initially expect.