I’ve got a question for those of you who’ve set up your own law practice — whether in the US, UK, or elsewhere, but especially those who went through the American law school route.
How much did where you went to law school actually matter when it came to starting your own practice?
I understand that for some people, it’s a big factor — especially if they go straight from undergrad into law school and take on significant student debt. But I’ve also seen quite a few people who worked beforehand, went to law school later, and graduated with little to no debt.
So I’m trying to get a clearer picture of this:
When you graduate and decide to start your own firm — whether it’s client representation, advisory work, etc. — how much does your law school’s name or prestige realistically affect things early on?
Did it help with:
Getting initial clients?
Building credibility?
Networking or referrals?
Practical skills or preparation?
Or does it quickly become irrelevant once you gain experience?
More specifically, is there a noticeable difference between attending a top-tier school (e.g. T14), a strong but less elite school, or a solid state school — particularly if your goal isn’t Big Law but running your own practice?
I can see how prestige might matter more internationally, but I’m curious how it plays out at the start, before you’ve built years of experience.