What's mine is mine and what's yours is mine too (Neil Sean's gossip)
MARRIAGE OF CONVENIENCE? MARKLE SPEAKS HARRY FALLS ASLEEP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GiaAgtTFjk
Harry might try to ignore things, but the fact is that after reading the criticism of his speech at the mental health event, Harry had a breakdown because people are being so harsh on him.
Especially when he sees that he's being treated like Claw's mere sidekick. He always has to be with her, and he's constantly having to say how much he loves her. But we never see how much she loves him.
As happened at the girls' retreat, Sean's friend told him that Gemma didn't really know what to ask Claw that would actually be interesting. According to Sean's friend, Gemma hadn't rehearsed anything, and everything seemed a bit sloppy, improvised, and incoherent.
But one thing was clear to her, and it's evident in the videos that have surfaced from the trip: when Claw is near Harry, she's the one who decides who Harry talks to, how, the direction of the conversation, and how long it lasts.
Sean says that this shows Claw is well aware that no one really cares about her, that it's Harry people want to talk to, so she asserts her authority.
Harry always has to be near Claw, he always has to be there supporting her. And that's because she always tells him the same story: I'm so nervous, I need you to be there.
Even at that silly girls' retreat. A girls' retreat, and Harry showed up there... with Markus, okay? But it was obvious to Sean's friend that Harry didn't want to be there. And no, Harry didn't want to be there; he was coerced into being there. And it shows, because in this video there's a shot from the girls' retreat, about three minutes in, where you can see Harry barely saying a few words before leaving.
Sean says he knows about Harry being coerced from an excellent source, that Claw told Harry "I can't do this without you, I need you there. I'm nervous, I'm very nervous."
And it's all because—and it's not just Sean saying this, it's obvious to everyone—Claw grabs the microphone, that's true, and she loves hearing her own voice, that's true. But she's incapable of giving a speech. She talks about herself; that's all she's capable of. But if she has to talk about something else, she can't even connect with the topic or emphasize the points where they need to be emphasized. She only knows how to talk about herself. And that's why she's boring when she speaks.
So Claw brings Harry along as a distraction.
We don't see Claw supporting Harry when he has to give a speech... unless it's Invictus, when she can take the microphone from him. Where she can't do that, she's not there.
He constantly has to reassure the world that he is madly in love with her.
But Harry also has to deal with the fact that his mental health talk was not only overshadowed by Claw's appearance on MasterChef, but it has also received very negative reviews. It seems Harry didn't expect his comment about Diana and how her being a royal was what killed her to be the most criticized. Harry doesn't seem to have grasped that people are fed up with the Diana Card.
Harry is slowly realizing that his career as a speaker is hanging by a thread because nobody wants to hear the same thing over and over again... which reminds me that Bower mentioned something about a Florida incident in Betrayal. I think Harry was paid a lot of money in 2021 or 2022 to give a speech in Florida, and it turns out the audience was furious because Harry seemed to arrive late and launched into the same thing he's doing now: complaints against the BRF and about his mother, Diana. Nor should we believe that Harry is actually going to change his tune: he's never studied the subject he speaks about; he knows nothing.
But the Harkles' income now depends on Harry. And Claw has realized that.
And Claw realized that Harry, on Friday, was also completely uninterested in what she was saying. In fact, he slept through most of the event. Claw kept making references to him so the audience would know he was there supporting her, but Harry was deeply bored and so he practically ran out of the event.
MARKLE - CUTS HIM OUT OF THIS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AivaqmkqKG4
Sean says Claw did make money... selling the clothes through that website. She receives a commission from that site. She does, not the couple.
Because what she really wants is to become a fashion icon.
The rumor going around is that she did invest some money in that website. I don't remember the name, and frankly, I'm not really interested in doing so.
The problem with that is we never really know what happens when she invests in something. We never see her drinking Clever Coffee. Nor what happened to the handbag company,Cesta Collective ; she doesn't use them since 2024.
Claw doesn't listen to criticism, not even the harsh criticism she received for what she wore on Bondi Beach.
Claw doesn't listen to criticism, not even the harsh criticism she received for what she wore to Bondi Beach because of the color of her blouse.
And now she doesn't even mention the jam. Last year it was all about the jam; now it's just that she wants her children to smell the jam she makes in the kitchen when they come home from school. Oh, and that she and Harry cook together.
Claw moves on from everything very quickly. She's that fickle. She loses interest.
But what about Harry? On this trip, Harry seemed better dressed than on other occasions; on other occasions, he looks like he just rolled out of bed. So, many people were asking why Harry's outfits weren't being promoted. Perhaps those people don't remember that when Dior did that—when Dior highlighted that Harry wore a Dior suit to the coronation—Claw had a fit because Dior absolutely refused to work with her.
Claw is a narcissist.
Claw is a narcissist. Everything has to revolve around her. So when her team sent Claw messages saying it would be good if she also included Harry's clothes, because people were asking about it, Claw said no, because that's not what Harry does... even though Harry didn't care that Dior said he wore a Dior suit.
Nobody can compete with Claw.
CASH FOR KIDS - MARKLE’S NEW LOW FOR DOUGH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwmV6hhF1VA
Only someone who is truly famous and successful doesn't need to resort to these tricks.
Which one? Selling your children.
Only someone who isn't truly famous and successful does that. A minor celebrity sells every aspect of their life; only micro-celebrities do that. A true celebrity lets their talent and work take priority.
Harry and Claw don't work.
A former employee noted that for a time, all Claw had to do was watch what the BRF was doing, especially regarding Wales's children.
Claw is trying to emulate what William and Kate do and get the same positive feedback because she can't understand why her children don't receive it.
She doesn't understand why she simply doesn't see that her children are always alone. Always.
Now she's selling candles using her children's names. And their titles. Which is pathetic. Because, on top of everything, Claw is doing this a week before the King's state visit to the USA. So Claw quickly began emphasizing that these children she has are princes... princes associated with a candle without a wick.
You buy candles for the scent... not for a child whose neck you can only see.
Now, I really hope this is just a false rumor.
Because it seems like the image of the box those candles were going to come in was going to be like this, but something like a drawing or something. Not the actual photos.
But that didn't happen. At the last minute, this idea was scrapped, and they were presented as Signature Candle No. 506 (referencing Archie's May 6 birthday) and Signature Candle No. 604 (a nod to Lil' D's June 4 birthday). This happened because his team told Claw that including those images of the children was going too far. But for Claw, it's no longer a step too far.
And even less so now, back in the USA, Claw and Harry are realizing that the big Australian tour wasn't the success they thought it would be. Because this was the huge crowd that was waiting for them on Bondi Beach.
https://x.com/nataliewould01/status/2045807068695970201
And the Harkles can't control what people post on the internet either, because Claw was supposed to be accompanying Harry to rugby.
But that only lasted a few minutes, because Claw and Markus went to dinner... without Harry.
https://x.com/fashionistaera/status/2045640575375089937
So, as Claw told Sean's friend: give them a bone. So here we go, diverting attention from the fact that the Harkles had problems in Australia, using the children's titles and using their children. An extremely maternal gesture from Claw. And a truly paternal one from Harry, the same Harry who in Spare complained that his father used him to improve his and Camilla's image.
And a little tidbit from me: the name "Princess" is used as a given name, being common in African/African American contexts. In 2021, it was the 901st most popular name for girls, with 297 girls receiving this name in the U.S. ( https://momcozy.com/blogs/baby-names/princess#:~:text=The%20name%20Princess%20is%20an,the%20wife%20of%20a%20prince ) ( https://www.mynamestats.com/First-Names/P/PR/PRINCESS/index.html )
None of this will matter unless Harry manages to get King Charles to take a picture with his sons. Because in the USA, Prince Archie isn't even close to being seen as the same as Prince George of Wales; he's more likely to be asked if his parents named him after Prince Markie Dee or Prince (whose full name was Prince Rogers Nelson). The Harrys can take pictures of the line of succession and stick them on the boys' chests... but without the King, that's the future for Harry's children: to be seen as having the names of rappers or singers.
