u/Haunting_Tax_5991

SpaceX is reportedly briefing Wall Street ahead of a potential $1.75 trillion IPO, aiming to raise $75 billion, more than double Saudi Aramco’s previous $29 billion record, with a targeted trading debut in late June.

A key highlight is the structure: around 30% of the allocation is expected to go to retail investors globally. This challenges the traditional IPO model, where institutions have long dominated early access while retail investors typically enter later.

The move mirrors growing trends in more open participation models, such as certain IPO style offerings on bitget, where barriers between insiders and the broader market are being lowered.

As a result, attention is shifting from sheer size to questions of access and fairness, potentially blurring the lines between conventional listings and more inclusive models. If realized, this could set a new standard for future large scale IPOs.

https://preview.redd.it/whw0t65dphwg1.png?width=1801&format=png&auto=webp&s=fca103a87469f30cacd61c17ee32a36542a8ac03

Yesterday it was somehow, and I didn’t know what I was thinking when I decided to take a short trade on $MSTR. I have been in this space for months, and I would say sentiment made me take that trade.

I learnt that anytime Michael Saylor buys more of BTC or anything, it is more or less like a bearish signal before it takes off, but my sentiment seemed to be wrong after seeing that MicroStrategy has acquired 34,164 BTC for $2.54 billion at $74,395 per bitcoin, which indirectly affected MSTR stock. I decided to short for a pullback before any bullish move, unfortunately it didn’t go my way.

I decided to correct my mistake and took a long trade, and when it pulled back to my former SL, my trade has been going nicely on stock futures. So my real question is, is Saylor buying BTC the main reason for the bullish move or is there any other news, so I could prepare to leave the market?

I want us to discuss this with an open mind because I didn’t accept the concept that in the next 2 to 3 years, AI will displace traders, and instead of using many hours to stay up looking for a stock to trade or buy that will do well, AI will be able to do that for us.

I was with a friend, and after having a lot of arguments on this (don’t mind us, we do this every time just to confirm our trading or investing strategies), we decided to put it to the test. We brought three AIs, ChatGPT, Claude, and GetClaw, and tested how far AI has come when it comes to trading news, which we can use as a signal to trade.

After prompting them based on what is happening in the war between Iran and the US, the first one gave a probability that the war will end soon at 70, the second said it could end at 50, while the third said 40, considering the two countries’ two week ultimatum is still there.

Now looking back at those answers and predictions with the current situation, can we trust them to find surging stocks, and also there is an AI competition?

I woke up to good news, and it is something worth celebrating, as the closing of the Strait of Hormuz for days and weeks has really affected the lives of people, most especially us that use gas and petroleum daily.

Now back to the question that I asked about what next, although the market already started reacting to the good news as oil (Brent and WTI) is now going down, SHORT traders are now getting good profit (also took mine during reversal on CFD), but it is possible the market keeps going down as there will be a lot of supply around oil because tomorrow may come and the situation changes.

The second thing is that the likes of stocks that have been stuck for a while because of the war will definitely start going bullish, and even BTC will not be exempted.

So if you are a trader, try to trade responsibly because a lot of liquidity will be flowing into the market, and I even just remembered that the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz did happen before the deadline, well predicted by Get Claw. Good luck to the nations involved and more peace.

https://preview.redd.it/skcn2lu0jpvg1.png?width=1920&format=png&auto=webp&s=2302ba0090e0a23672971f16b244ecf057577363

The short story of my life as a trader yesterday. Imagine waking up and thinking of which stock to trade as a stock trader that I am, and while going through the stock news I heard that in a few hours both Netflix and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company stocks would be having their earnings. At the beginning everything looked good for them.

Hours later they both came out good as expected, meaning good first quarter earnings results, and everyone was running to take the long as it seemed that the demand was growing for $TSM and $NFLX. I also decided not to be left behind, I went straight to stock futures as to look for a better entry and long, but before I entered I decided to check the past news and it did not really look good, plus the news that co founder and chairman of the board Reed Hastings will be stepping down in order to focus on his philanthropy and other pursuits.

All these made me change my direction and go short with little capital. Right now, $NFLX hit my TP and is still going down. Now to everyone trading stocks, do you think with a lot of controversy surrounding Netflix they can go back up?

I’ve been reflecting on the difference between hype and real adoption in the digital asset space, and it’s becoming clearer that the two don’t always move together. A project can trend heavily online, attract strong community engagement, and still remain mostly speculative in nature. Real progress, in my view, only starts to show when attention begins to shift away from charts and into actual usage scenarios.

What makes the recent signals around #NEWCAT $NCT interesting is the growing attention it appears to be getting from shop owners in parts of Asia. If that’s truly the direction things are moving, then it suggests an early stage of practical exploration rather than just online speculation. It’s still early, but this kind of shift is often how real-world adoption quietly begins before it becomes widely noticed.

From my perspective, adoption only becomes meaningful when a digital asset starts being used in everyday transactions, especially as a form of payment rather than just something to trade. If this trend continues, $NCT could gradually move from being viewed as a speculative asset into something with actual utility. The bigger question then becomes how far it can go in becoming part of normal day-to-day spending, and what that shift would mean for how we define “value” in the digital asset space.