Something I have been thinking about lately and wanted to get peoples honest opinions on.
We all know universities are cracking down on AI. But here is what I find more interesting than the detectors. Tutors have been reading dissertations in their subject for decades. They know exactly how a student at each level writes. The vocabulary they use. The way they build an argument. The natural inconsistencies in human academic writing.
AI writes perfectly. Too perfectly. Unnaturally consistent. No real academic voice. No genuine critical thinking that surprises the reader. My theory is that even when AI work passes every detector a
experienced tutor can still sense it. They cannot prove it. But they can give it a 52 and move on.
Has anyone actually experienced this? Either personally or heard from someone who has?
Would love to hear genuine experiences from people on both sides of this.