u/Flat_Ad_4669

Ibn Taymiyyah’s writings were considered authoritative in and of themselves

Ibn Taymiyyah’s writings were considered authoritative in and of themselves

Ibn Abideen (d. 1252 AH) was the most prominent Hanafi scholar in his time. He is nicknamed "Khatimat Al-Muhaqqiqen (The seal of the rigorous [scholars])".

His work Rad Al-Muhtar (AKA Hashiyat Ibn Abideen) is considered one of the Mu'tamad (definitive) Texts in Hanafi Fiqh today.

In this book we find him quoting Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 728 AH) and documenting a Hanafi view based solely on Sheikh Al-Islam's word. Ibn Abideen says:

I saw in the book "Al-Sarim Al-Maslul" by Sheikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah Al-Hanbali the following: "As for Abu Hanifa and his companions, they said: (The Sheikh then stated the Hanafi view)..."

Ibn Abideen then said: His (Sheikh Al-Islam's) statement: 'Even if he converts to Islam after being captured,' I have not seen anyone from us (Hanafis) explicitly state this, but he transmitted it from our Madhab, and he is reliable, so it is accepted. (Hashiyat Ibn Abideen: 4/233).

------------------

Inspired by this article

Ibn Abideen's original text can be found here

Of course, this isn't the usual way Muslim jurists document views, which is why I thought it was worth a post. And the title is supposed to be sarcastic, as scholars usually demand references when a claim is brought up.

u/Flat_Ad_4669 — 16 hours ago