Login

u/Exen44

Image 1 —
Image 2 —
Image 3 —
Image 4 —
Image 5 —
Image 6 —
Image 7 —
▲ 2 r/RepTimeQC

  • Dealer name: InTime
  • Factory name: VSF
  • Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 116520
  • Price Paid: $588
  • Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/fVtmEOt
  • Index alignment: Looks acceptable overall. Slight tilt in photo likely due to camera/watch angle rather than actual marker misalignment. Nothing obvious stands out.
  • Dial Printing: Printing looks clean from available photos. No major issues noticed with text, subdials, or markers.
  • Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (no date wheel on this model)
  • Hand Alignment: Looks good. Chronograph hands appear centered properly.
  • Bezel: Looks good. Engraving and tachymeter alignment appear acceptable.
  • Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, no obvious large gaps visible.
  • Timegrapher numbers: +5s/day, 278 amplitude, 0.2ms beat error, 52° lift angle. Seems acceptable?
  • Anything else you notice: Overall watch looks solid to me. Rehaut and chrono subdial spacing look good. Would appreciate extra eyes before GL.
u/Exen44 — 7 days ago
▲ 1 r/RepTimeQC

  • Dealer name: InTime
  • Factory name: VSF
  • Model name (& version number): Daytona 116520
  • Price Paid: $588
  • Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/fVtmEOt
  • Index alignment: Slightly off in photo but likely due to watch tilt/angle. Nothing obvious looks misaligned.
  • Dial Printing: Printing looks clean from available photos. No major issues noticed.
  • Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (no date wheel)
  • Hand Alignment: Looks good
  • Bezel: Looks good
  • Solid End Links (SELs): Looks good, no obvious gaps
  • Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable
  • Anything else you notice: Chrono hand alignment looks acceptable. Overall GL pending better close-up photos.
u/Exen44 — 7 days ago