A “traditional” relationship isn’t even traditional
So many believe a “traditional” relationship, one where the man is the sole provider and the woman is the sole care giver, is the way humans did relationships for millennia. No, they honestly didn’t.
That framework for a relationship is much more resent. It became the dominant framework sometime after the industrial revolution. Reaching its peak I would say in and around the 1950s.
I know it’s not how people traditionally did relationships because, in America for example, most pre-industrialist Americans were farmers and homesteaders. Even most peasant Europeans, pre-American Europe, were farmers and homesteaders.
One person cannot successfully manage a farm or homestead on their own. It requires multiple people, a whole family to work on it. For most people to be farmers and homesteaders, and to think that traditionally a man left all day to go work, while the woman stayed home to manage the house, the whole homestead, all on her own while taking care of children, is ridiculous. It would be damn near impossible to manage such a lifestyle!
No, traditionally, men and women worked together to manage their farm or homestead. Multiple generations of families would live and work together on homesteads. They would have to.
There weren’t large grocery stores back then. There weren’t all these jobs to make a living like there is now.
No, the way most married couples and common people survived and lived their lives back then, was by working together and managing a homestead. Both men and woman, families, and capable children.
So to call the relationship framework of the man is the provider and the woman is the care giver, “Traditional”, is completely inaccurate to say the least. It isn’t traditional by any stretch of the word. Living and working together as a couple and family was actually what has always been traditional.