u/Downtown-Art2865

▲ 16 r/macapps

What’s still worth building in the clipboard manager space

Every two weeks, I see someone announcing a new clipboard manager. Honestly, it’s become a running joke at this point.

We already have some genuinely beloved apps in this category. Maccy is the minimalist leader relied upon by many. Pastebot remains the go-to for power users, thanks to its filters and one-time purchase. Raycast and Alfred have excellent built-in history features. These tools already address everyday needs very well.

In my view, after Apple introduced native clipboard history in Tahoe, the bar was raised significantly. I feel most new apps seem to solve problems that are already well addressed. If I were advising a fellow developer considering this category today, I’d recommend focusing on three areas:

  1. AI-native semantic search that runs locally
  2. Proper end-to-end encrypted sync across devices
  3. Advanced developer workflows with structured transforms and secret handling.

PS: Just sharing my observations after spending time examining the market. I’m not here to mock or criticise anyone building in this space. I genuinely want to see the category improve and believe these areas hold the most potential.

reddit.com
u/Downtown-Art2865 — 1 day ago

What made me actually pay for an AI orchestration tool: Nyx’s free-form canvas

I used to run my AI coding workflow by keeping multiple agents active at the same time. Typically, I’d have one agent working on code generation or refactoring in a Claude window, another one handling tests or debugging in a different chat interface, the terminal running commands in yet another tab, and me jumping between all of them while trying to hold the full picture in my head.

The problem was that none of it was connected. I was constantly copying context between tools, forgetting which model I had given the prompt to, losing the thread the moment I switched branches or tasks, and having no single place to see how everything was progressing together. The mental fatigue was real. It was slowing me down instead of speeding me up.

With Superset.sh It was easy to quickly start parallel agents and worktrees, but keeping track of everything in real time was still a nightmare. I often had to dig through logs or switch between different environments just to see how things were going.

Conductor used a clear central pattern for routing tasks, but it felt too linear. When I added more agents, things got complicated; it was hard to see dependencies or step in where needed. Most of the details stayed hidden behind the main interface.

That scattered feeling is what made me look for something different.

I first saw Nyx in my X feed from the founder, [Kraggich](https://x.com/Kraggich). The canvas idea seemed like it could give me a better overview in one place, so I started the 15-day trial and later bought the license.

Two weeks in and I’m still using it every day. Being able to lay everything out, agents, terminal, editor, and monitoring, in one view, does cut down on some of the chaos I used to deal with. The hotkeys make flipping between tiles feel pretty natural, too. It hasn’t magically fixed everything, though.

That said, the canvas has real limitations. It gets visually noisy fast when you have more than a few tiles open. Performance can dip when too many agents are active at once. And it took me a while to figure out how to arrange things so they're actually useful rather than overwhelming. The monitoring is better than what I had, but it’s not as deep or automated as dedicated tools.

It’s not a magic fix. I’m still tweaking my setup, and it won’t replace everything I use. But for my particular workflow, it reduced some of the constant context switching.

The one-time purchase pricing was also a factor. Nice not to add another subscription.

Full disclosure: no connection to the team at all. Paid full price after the trial ended.

For anyone else working with multiple AI agents on Mac,

  1. What pain points have you faced with tools like Superset.sh or Conductor?
  2. Have you tried a canvas-style setup like Nyx? Did the limitations outweigh the benefits for you, or did you find a way to make it work well?
getnyx.dev
u/Downtown-Art2865 — 1 day ago
▲ 37 r/macapps

Drafts after 1,200 days - why it only clicked once I stopped treating it like a notes app

https://preview.redd.it/5mxkrirknt0h1.png?width=1938&format=png&auto=webp&s=9a9666a96f9cf86ecd81d240866b788b47fe1789

I've installed Drafts twice before and deleted it both times. Opened to a blank screen, no obvious structure, and I couldn't figure out what it was for that Apple Notes wasn't already doing.

Then, in 2023, I lost a few half-finished ideas, which I typed into the wrong app and never recovered. It was a small thing, but annoying enough to go back and actually give it a proper shot.

Went down a rabbit hole of YouTube reviews to figure out the "right" way to use it. Most of them kept saying the same thing: stop trying to organize as you capture and just throw everything in and process later.

I tried the same for a week and started throwing everything in my inbox, voice notes from walks, half-sentences from meetings, links I'd want later. One inbox. Decide where it goes in the evening.

That was it.

Now, after about 1,200+ days and roughly 15,000 captures later, Drafts is the app that sees almost every piece of text I write before it turns into a note in Obsidian, an email in Canary, or a todo.

What 1,200 days of daily use looks like

  • Total drafts: ~15,000
  • Obsidian vault: ~450 notes in 2022 → ~2,900 now
  • Capture-to-processed time: ~7 minutes per item in 2023 → under a minute now
  • Drafts created via Apple Watch voice complication: roughly 15% of the total, that one surprised me

How I actually use it day to day now

Capture everywhere, decide later

  • Watch complication: tap it mid-walk, talk for 20–30 seconds, tap done. It's already text by the time I put my wrist down, and usually in my inbox across my phone and Mac by the time I sit down.
  • Share sheet from Safari, Mail, Messages: any link or snippet that feels like "I'll want this later" goes here instead of a half-open tab.
  • Lock screen widget: one tap to a new draft when I'm mid-meeting and don't want to switch apps.

One inbox, one evening sweep

I keep a workspace that shows only drafts with no tags and no flags. That's the inbox.

At some point in the evening, I run a single "process" action on each item. It pops a small menu: send to today's Obsidian daily note, send to a project note, turn into an email draft, turn into a todo, archive, or trash.

Most days, there are 10-15 things. Takes under 10 minutes. Nothing sits unprocessed past 24 hours. The important part isn't the discipline -- it's that I'm not doing "which app does this belong in right now" at the moment of capture.

Email drafting before Canary

Any email that could go wrong, whether to a manager or with a subtle tone, always starts in Drafts.

Brain-dump it there, run a tone-adjust action, then fire a mailto: link that opens a pre-filled compose window in whatever your default mail client is — Canary for me. Subject and body are already there, and Canary adds my default signature.

Drafts vs Apple Notes vs Obsidian on mobile

This is the thing I wish someone had just said clearly, because it's why Drafts didn't click for me in initial attempts.

  • Apple Notes is where stuff lives. Good for small collections, shared lists, basic folders. Not built to be a high-volume, zero-friction inbox.
  • Obsidian is a knowledge base. On mobile, it's usable, but it's slower to get into "just type something, and we'll sort it out later" mode. Lou Plummer (Amerpie) at AppAddict, himself a power user of Drafts, put it exactly right: "My favourite notes app, Obsidian, has a well-deserved reputation for being slow on the draw on iOS. Drafts is the solution to that issue." That's the gap.
  • Drafts is intentionally bad at being a permanent home. Very good at being a staging area.

If you take a few notes a week, I think Drafts is overkill. Apple Notes or Obsidian are fine for your use-case, but if 10+ bits of text hit you daily, ideas, links, tasks, emails, meeting scribbles and whatnot, then the separation helps:

  • Drafts = inbox and router
  • Obsidian/Notes = long-term storage
  • Tasks app = actual todos

AI and automation - what actually stayed

Drafts has scripting hooks for online models (OpenAI / Claude / Gemini) and on newer Apple devices, hooks for on-device models too. I tried a bunch of clever actions and kept only the boring ones:

  • summarize long meeting notes into 3 bullets
  • extract tasks and action items
  • suggest tags for a draft
  • clean up email tone
  • lightly reformat text for Obsidian

Most of this runs on-device now, fast, private, no API cost for trivial stuff. Anything that needs real reasoning goes to a cloud model.

Worth being honest about one thing, though: if you hate touching JavaScript, the AI part will feel more fiddly than magical. I adapted maybe 70% of my actions from existing ones in the community directory rather than writing from scratch.

What I'd do differently starting now

  • Set up a local backup path on day one. I lost over two days of drafts to an iCloud sync hiccup in 2024. Recovered most from an unsynced Mac, but now I also keep a folder bookmark in my Obsidian vault as a second layer.
  • Keep an action maintenance note. When I update a custom action, I also export its JSON into a scratch note. Big OS updates occasionally break things, and having the last good version saves an hour.
  • Don't subscribe on day one. The free tier is enough to know if the capture habit fits. Only upgrade when you hit a specific wall. For me, it was workspaces and custom action editing.
  • Steal from the directory first. The community action directory has 90% of what you think you need. Adapting someone else's action is way faster than a blank file.

What hasn't worked

  • Action Bar reordering after big iOS updates breaks muscle memory. It's annoying every time.
  • Custom JS actions have a real learning curve. "Draft objects" and "action contexts" took a week to internalize.
  • No real collaboration. Solo tool. If your team lives in shared notes, Drafts won't help.
  • That sync scare in 2024 changed how I think about single points of failure in any sync system. Hasn't happened again, but it's in the back of my head.

If you want pretty canvases or shared docs, Craft or Notion will serve you better.

Pricing

Free tier covers: quick capture, sync, and running pre-built actions from the directory. Good enough to properly evaluate the habit.

Drafts Pro is $19.99/year. Unlocks workspaces, custom action editing, themes, and extra widgets.

I personally spent over four months on the free version and then upgraded when the workflow was clearly earning it. Recommend the same over committing on day one.

Not affiliated with Drafts. Paid for Pro myself. No referral.

Who this is for

Makes sense if you:

  • live in text -- ideas, emails, notes, tasks all day
  • already use something like Obsidian or Apple Notes as a vault
  • like the idea of one capture place, many exits
  • are willing to install and adapt actions from other people (or write them yourself eventually)

Skip it if you:

  • only take a few notes a week
  • want collaboration or rich formatting over speed
  • automation makes your eyes glaze over
  • happy with "long-press Notes widget, type, done"

Questions for the sub

  1. If you tried Drafts and bounced, what specifically didn't click? The subscription, the blank screen, or "I already have Obsidian/Notes and don't need another inbox"?
  2. Anyone using Drafts as a capture layer in front of another notes app? If not, what do you use instead?
  3. If you use Drafts actions with AI (cloud or on‑device), which ones do you find yourself using regularly?
reddit.com
u/Downtown-Art2865 — 7 days ago
▲ 188 r/macapps

Raycast vs Alfred vs Spotlight after Tahoe — what this sub often gets wrong about launchers vs FAF, Cling, EasyFind & HoudahSpot

Last week I posted my notes on Little Snitch 6 here and it got a lot more traction than I expected. A bunch of you DM’d me with follow-up questions and tool recommendations, which honestly made my week. So I figured I’d keep going while I’m in the mood to actually write things down instead of just hoarding tabs.

This one’s been brewing for a while. I’ve been on Alfred for something like 7 years, dabbled with Raycast on and off for the last two, and Tahoe finally pushed me to sit down and audit what I’m actually using each tool for. And the more I read recent threads here, the more I noticed the same confusion popping up: people treating Raycast, Alfred, and Spotlight like they’re the same category of tool with different paint jobs. They’re not. And the dedicated search apps (FAF, Cling, EasyFind, HoudahSpot) are doing something completely different that gets lumped in with launchers way too often.

So this is my attempt to lay out what I’ve actually figured out from daily use. Not a tier list. Not “best launcher 2026.” Just where each tool fits in my workflow and where I think the sub is mixing things up.

What changed in Tahoe’s Spotlight (briefly)
If you’ve been ignoring this because “Spotlight is Spotlight,” it’s worth a fresh look. Tahoe’s update genuinely shifted what stock Spotlight is capable of:

  1. Four sections accessible via ⌘1–⌘4: Applications, Files, Actions, and Clipboard. Apple doesn’t call them tabs in the official copy, but functionally that’s how they work.
  2. Direct actions baked in. Apple’s wording: “hundreds of new system and app actions right from Spotlight,” including running shortcuts, sending messages, creating events.
  3. They’ve also introduced “Quick Keys” (type “SM” → Send Message style shortcuts).
  4. Searchable clipboard history. Default retention is 8 hours, configurable from 30 minutes up to 7 days in System Settings → Spotlight. One privacy concern though: it’ll store passwords you copied unless you turn it off. Alfred and Raycast both detect password-manager fields and skip them.
    Better ranking using “intelligent suggestions based on your routines”, Apple’s words, but it does feel noticeably smarter on recently used apps and files.

It’s not Raycast. It’s not Alfred. But it’s no longer the bare-bones launcher people remember from a few macOS versions ago.

The actual difference between Spotlight, Alfred, and Raycast
This is the part I think gets flattened the most in this sub.
Spotlight in Tahoe is now a competent system launcher with quick actions and clipboard. It’s tightly integrated with macOS, free, and fast because Apple controls the index and rendering layer.
Alfred is a power user’s keyboard interface. The Powerpack workflows (one-time purchase, with Mega being the lifetime-upgrades license) are still the deepest customization layer of any of these tools. If you’ve ever written a workflow that takes a clipboard URL, parses it, hits an API, and dumps the result into a note in under a second, you know what I mean. Alfred doesn’t even require an account.
Raycast is closer to a developer command palette that grew up. The extension store has thousands of extensions, the AI features are aggressive, and it ships new things almost weekly. It’s also the heaviest of the three by a meaningful margin and account-tied for most of the good stuff.

Here’s how I actually score them on the things that matter day to day: please refer the attached screenshot.

A few things worth saying out loud:
On resource use and privacy, this ties back to my Little Snitch post from last week. Raycast was one of the apps that surprised me when I started actually monitoring outbound connections. It’s not malicious, they’re upfront in their docs that the core app is local-first and their AI runs through third-party providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Perplexity, others), but it’s chatty if you turn on AI, Cloud Sync, or any account features. Alfred barely shows up. Spotlight is a system process so it’s a different conversation. If you care about that stuff, it’s worth running Little Snitch (or LuLu) for a week and just watching what each one does.

On pricing, I keep seeing “Raycast is free!” framed as a knockout argument. The free tier is genuinely generous (window management, clipboard history with 3-month retention, snippets, basic features all free), but the moment you want AI or Cloud Sync, you’re at $8/mo billed annually, which is $96/year forever. If you pay monthly it’s $10/mo. Alfred’s Mega license is £59 once and I’ve been on it across three Macs and four major macOS versions without paying again. Different models, both reasonable, but they shouldn’t be compared as if they’re equivalent. Worth knowing: the standard Alfred £34 license isn’t lifetime — only Mega is.

Where the dedicated search tools come in (and why launchers can’t replace them)
This is the part I really want people to read.
Spotlight, Alfred file search, and Raycast file search all rely on macOS’s Spotlight index in some form. That index is good, but it has fundamental gaps:

  1. It doesn’t index everything. System files, hidden folders, dotfiles, files inside packages, files on external drives that haven’t been indexed, files inside ignored folders, they all are invisible to Spotlight-based search.
  2. Network shares (SMB, AFP, NFS) typically aren’t indexed at all. If you work off a NAS, Spotlight is mostly blind to it.
  3. It indexes mostly by name and a subset of metadata. Deep content search across non-indexed file types is unreliable.
  4. It can get stale, corrupted, or just refuse to reindex without manual intervention. Apple has an entire support article on rebuilding it with mdutil.
    The dedicated tools each solve a different version of this problem, and they don’t overlap as much as people assume.

Find Any File (FAF) does live, recursive, brute-force searching of the actual filesystem. No index. So it finds hidden files, system files, dotfiles, files inside ignored folders, network volumes, places Spotlight literally cannot reach. It’s slower than Spotlight on large drives because it’s doing real work (NAS searches can take a few minutes), but it finds things nothing else does. $6 from the developer’s site (apps.tempel.org), $8 on the App Store. There’s a Pro tier in development for power-user use cases. I use it almost weekly for “where the hell did Xcode put that file” situations.

Cling is the one I want to be careful about because the description gets confused a lot. Cling (lowtechguys.com) is not a HoudahSpot-style query builder. It’s a fuzzy file finder modeled on Windows’ Everything, meaning it’s optimized for “I roughly know the name of the file, find it instantly.” It builds its own in-memory index using fd + fzf and tracks changes via FSEvents, so it can index System and Root scopes that Spotlight skips. What it does NOT have: boolean operators, attribute search (date, size, EXIF, author), or saved metadata queries. The developer is explicit about this — Cling is for speed and simplicity, not complex queries. Free with limits (caps at 500 results); Pro is €12 one-time for unlimited results, system/root scopes, and up to 5 personal Macs. Open-source on GitHub, active development.

EasyFind is the freeware classic from DEVONtechnologies. Old UI, but it does live recursive content search, supports regex, boolean operators, wildcards, phrases, and tag/comment search. It ignores Spotlight entirely, no indexing required. If you’re searching for a string of text inside a thousand log files, EasyFind will find it when nothing else will.

HoudahSpot is the power user’s GUI on top of Spotlight. It does rely on the Spotlight index (the dev is explicit: if Spotlight indexing is off or broken, HoudahSpot won’t work either), but it gives you a real query builder, attribute-based searches (date ranges, kind, owner, tags, GPS coordinates, image resolution, custom metadata), saved templates, and proper result management. Current version is 6.7, fully Tahoe-compatible. $34 single-user, $52 family. Also on Setapp if you’re already subscribed. If you do a lot of professional file work (legal, journalism, research, design archives), this is the one.

Quick way to think about which to reach for:

- I need to launch an app or run a quick command → launcher (Spotlight / Alfred / Raycast)
- I know roughly what file I want and it’s a normal file in a normal place → Spotlight or Alfred file search
- I roughly know a filename and want it found instantly, including in system folders → Cling
- I need to find a file Spotlight refuses to find (packages, network drives, root) → FAF or EasyFind
- I need to search inside file contents across many files with regex → EasyFind
- I need to build a complex, repeatable, attribute-based query → HoudahSpot

Where I actually landed
After all of this, my setup is genuinely a mix. Alfred is still my main launcher and snippet manager because the muscle memory is too deep and the workflows I’ve built over the years aren’t worth rebuilding. I use Tahoe Spotlight for clipboard now, which is a small but real change. I keep Raycast installed for a few specific extensions and the AI quick-action thing, but it’s not my daily driver. And I have FAF and HoudahSpot in my dock for the file searches that actually matter, with Cling on a hotkey for the “find this thing now” moments.

The thing I’ve stopped doing is treating “launcher” and “file search tool” as the same category. They’re not. A launcher is a keyboard interface to your system. A file search tool is a query engine over your filesystem. Different jobs, different tools.

Pricing reality check
If you add up what people often recommend on this sub, you get: Raycast Pro ($96/yr, billed annually) + a paid clipboard manager + a paid window manager + a paid snippet tool. Easily $150-200/yr forever. Or you can go: Spotlight (free) + Alfred Mega (£59 once, roughly $80) + FAF ($6 one-time) + HoudahSpot ($34 one-time, occasionally on Setapp) + Cling Pro (€12 one-time) + EasyFind (free). One-time spend, lifetime use. Just something to think about before subscribing to another thing.

Questions for the sub
I’m genuinely curious about a few things and would love to hear how others are using these:

  1. What’s your main daily use case for search and launching, and which tool actually handles it? I think a lot of disagreements here come from people optimizing for different jobs and not realizing it.
  2. Anyone made a real switch after Tahoe (away from Raycast or Alfred toward Spotlight, or in the other direction)? What pushed you?
  3. Which dedicated file search tool do you reach for, and what’s the specific situation that makes you open it?

No affiliation with any of these tools. Bought Alfred Mega myself years ago, paid for HoudahSpot, FAF, and Cling Pro out of pocket, used Raycast on the free tier and briefly trialed Pro, EasyFind is freeware.

u/Downtown-Art2865 — 12 days ago

18 months ago I started using Obsidian as a coding knowledge base. Mostly engineering notes, AI/LLM research, and a running learning log of stuff I keep forgetting and re-learning. Vault’s at around 3,200 notes now, ~14k internal links, and I’ve rebuilt my plugin setup from scratch twice because it kept getting bloated.

This isn’t the popular plugin list. It’s the one that’s left after I uninstalled everything I wasn’t actually opening. Sharing in case it saves someone else the cycle.

Templater — the only plugin I’d quit Obsidian over if it disappeared. I have one daily note template with a tasks section, a “what I’m reading” pull, and an auto-link to the previous day. The “auto-link to previous day” part is what made my daily notes actually connected instead of being orphaned islands.

Dataview — I resisted this for months because it looked like a database thing and my brain isn’t a database brain. Then I needed a way to find every note tagged #stuck and I wrote my first query and it took 4 lines. Now I have a “things I gave up on” page that auto-populates and it’s weirdly therapeutic to scroll through.

Tasks — I tried using it as a full GTD system and it was overkill. Now I use exactly one feature: due dates with recurring rules. That’s it. Recurring tasks inside daily notes is the thing that finally got me to stop using a separate todo app.

QuickAdd — capture-from-anywhere shortcut. I have one called “log this thought” that opens a one-line input, dumps it into an inbox file with a timestamp, and closes. The whole loop is under 2 seconds. Most days I use this 10+ times.

Calendar + Periodic Notes — pairing them is obvious but worth saying. The thing that took me too long to figure out: weekly notes are more useful than daily notes for actually reviewing patterns. Daily notes are a stream. Weekly is where you notice you’ve been complaining about the same thing for a month.

Linter — boring, invisible, runs on save, fixes my heading spacing and YAML frontmatter so I don’t have to think about it. The plugin you forget exists, which is the highest praise.

Style Settings — not a workflow plugin, just lets me actually read what I’m writing. I bumped the editor font size, tightened line height, and softened the background and suddenly I could write for an hour without my eyes bailing on me.

Excalidraw — I have one specific use case: sketching out system designs and architecture diagrams for engineering posts. Embeds inline, opens fast, doesn’t try to be Figma. The fact that drawings are markdown-linkable means I can pull them into notes from anywhere.

Omnisearch — Obsidian’s native search is fine. Omnisearch is fine and fuzzy and searches inside PDFs. I keep all my AI papers in Obsidian and being able to search “transformer attention” across 80 PDFs in under a second is the difference between actually using my reference library and pretending I will someday.

Bases (core, not a plugin, but it counts) — replaced my big ugly Dataview tables with something I can actually filter visually. I migrated my “AI papers I want to read” tracker over and it’s the first time I’ve enjoyed looking at it. Still figuring out where Dataview ends and Bases begins, but that’s the fun part.

Two I dropped in the last six months: Kanban (I never opened the boards I made — turns out I don’t think in columns) and Projects (felt like I was building a Notion clone inside Obsidian, which is a sign you’ve lost the plot). Both are good plugins. They just weren’t for me.

The thing I keep relearning: every plugin you add is a small ongoing tax on the speed and simplicity of the app. I keep my count under 15 because anything more and Obsidian starts feeling like every other tool I bounced off.

Curious what’s on other people’s lists, especially anyone using Bases heavily — feels like the sub is split between “this changes everything” and “Dataview still wins” and I can’t tell which camp I’m in yet.

u/Downtown-Art2865 — 15 days ago
▲ 912 r/macapps

I’d been hearing about Little Snitch for years at this point. Colleagues swore by it. A couple of friends in security said it was the one paid app on their Mac they’d never give up. This sub mentions it constantly. And I kept putting it off.

The reason was honestly just the price. $59 for a one-time purchase, single device. I’ve bought plenty of paid Mac software before like Bartender, Things, Soulver, the usual, but $59 for one machine felt like a lot for something I wasn’t sure I’d actually use. The free options (Lulu, the built-in firewall) seemed “good enough” on paper.

Six months ago I finally decided to check. Writing about it here in case anyone else has been on the fence for the same reason.

Why I finally bought it

A couple of things tipped me over:

I’d read one too many threads about how chatty modern apps are with telemetry and analytics, and I realized I genuinely had no idea what was leaving my machine.
I tried Lulu first for about a week. It blocks fine, but it doesn’t show you anything. I wanted visibility, not just a deny list.
The 30-day demo mode (it cycles on and off in 3-hour windows) was enough to convince me the alert UX was actually decent, not the clunky popup hell I’d half-expected.

So I bought it.

First night, Adobe Creative Cloud alone tried to phone home to something like 22 different domains in the first 20 minutes. I hadn’t even opened Photoshop. That was the moment I realized why everyone had been telling me to buy this thing.

The first week is rough

Not gonna sugarcoat it. The first few days were a mess of popups. Every app I opened wanted to talk to five different servers and I had no idea which ones were legit. Spotify needs to reach its CDN, fine. But why is iStat Menus connecting to an analytics domain in Ireland? Why is my PDF reader checking for updates and sending telemetry and loading fonts from a third-party host?

I almost uninstalled it twice. The cognitive load of “is this connection real or sketchy” on top of actually trying to work was rough.

What saved me:

- I stopped trying to make perfect decisions. If something looked legitimate (CDN, official domain, obvious update server), I allowed it for that app only and moved on.
- I leaned on the Research Assistant feature pretty heavily. It tells you what a domain is for and whether it’s known sketchy.
- I turned on Silent Mode (deny mode) for a couple of evenings while I just watched the Network Monitor and learned what normal looked like.

By end of week 2 the popup volume had dropped maybe 80%. By week 4 I was getting maybe 2-3 alerts a day, almost always for something new.

What I actually use it for now (months 2–6)

Honestly, the popups aren’t even the main value anymore. The Network Monitor is. Being able to open it and see, in real time, every process on my machine and what it’s connecting to — that’s the thing I didn’t know I wanted.

Some specific things I caught or learned:

- A small menu bar utility I’d been using for over a year was reaching out to an analytics endpoint every 15 minutes. Not malicious, just noisy. Blocked it, app still works fine.
- Adobe is genuinely something else. Even with Creative Cloud signed out, there are background processes that try to reconnect constantly. My deny rules for Adobe alone are probably 30+ entries.
- One of my browsers was making connections I couldn’t explain even with all extensions disabled. Turned out to be a built-in feature I’d never noticed in settings.
- Random one: a game I hadn’t opened in 4 months was still checking in daily with its publisher’s telemetry server.

The traffic map and the live connection graph are honestly more useful for vibes than for action. But the DNS encryption and the blocklist subscriptions (I’m running Steven Black’s hosts list through it) are doing real work. According to my stats panel I’m at something like 27,000 blocked connections over 6 months. No idea how meaningful that number actually is, but it’s not zero.

The honest pros and cons

What’s good:

- The Network Monitor is genuinely best-in-class. Nothing else on macOS gives you this view.
- Rule management scales reasonably well even with ~800 rules. Search and filtering work.
- It’s stable. In 6 months I’ve had 2 crashes. Performance hit is invisible to me.
- The DNS encryption + blocklist combo means it’s also doing some of what a Pi-hole would, without the Pi.
- Native feel. It looks and behaves like a Mac app, not an Electron port of a Windows tool.

What’s not:

- The price still stings a little. $59 single-device is on the high end for one-time Mac software, especially if you have multiple machines. The family/multi-device pricing helps but it’s still not cheap.
- The learning curve is real. If you don’t enjoy thinking about networking even a little, you’ll bounce off it.
- Rule sprawl is a thing. After 6 months my rule list is genuinely hard to audit. I’ve started over once.
- Alerts during screen sharing or presentations are awkward. Silent Mode helps but you have to remember to flip it.
- Occasional false positives where I block something and an app starts misbehaving in non-obvious ways. Tracking that down took me a couple of hours more than once.

Edge cases worth flagging

A few things that took me a while to figure out:

- Battery impact: basically nothing I can measure. Older Intel Macs apparently see more of a hit from what I’ve read.
Major macOS updates can break things briefly. The Sequoia 15.1 update needed a reinstall of the kernel-level component for me. Took 5 minutes but caught me off guard.
- iCloud-related connections are a rabbit hole. Block the wrong one and Calendar sync silently fails for a day before you notice.
- VPN interactions: Mullvad needed some specific allow rules before it would route correctly.

What about Lulu / Radio Silence / built-in firewall?

Like I said, I tried Lulu for about a week before paying for Little Snitch. It’s free, it’s open source, the developer is great. For pure outbound blocking it works. What it doesn’t have is the Network Monitor depth, the traffic map, the connection history, or the same rule management. If you mainly want a “block this thing forever” tool and don’t care about visibility, Lulu is genuinely fine and you should try it first — you might not need to spend the $59.

Radio Silence is even simpler — it’s basically a deny list. Cheaper, easier, way less powerful.

The built-in macOS firewall doesn’t do outbound at all. It’s not in the same category.

So for me, Little Snitch earned the price by being the only one with the monitoring layer. If I just wanted blocking, I’d be on Lulu and $59 richer.

Was the price worth it

Six months in, yeah. I’d buy it again. The thing that finally justified the cost in my head wasn’t any single feature — it was that I now actually understand what’s running on my machine. That’s not a thing I can get from a free tool.

That said, I want to be fair: if you’re someone who’s going to install it, click “allow” on everything, and never open the Network Monitor, don’t pay for this. You’re paying for visibility and control, and visibility only matters if you’re going to look. Lulu plus a decent blocklist is a better deal for that crowd.

Not affiliated with Objective Development. Paid full price. No referral.

u/Downtown-Art2865 — 15 days ago

I’ve been reading about India’s growth story and ran into a number that confused me.

From roughly 2004 to 2022, India’s GDP grew at around 6-7% annually. That’s the kind of sustained growth where Lewis-style development models predict labor moving out of agriculture and into industry/services, with overall participation rising — especially among women as urbanization, education, and household incomes increase.
What actually happened is the opposite. Female labor force participation dropped from roughly 30% in the mid-2000s to around 24% by the early 2020s. There’s been some recovery since but the long-run trend went the wrong way during one of the biggest sustained growth runs of any major economy.

What I don’t understand:
1. Is this a measurement artifact (e.g. unpaid household work being reclassified) or a real decline in market participation?
2. If it’s real, what does the standard development literature say is going on? I’ve seen references to the U-shaped FLFP curve, but India seems to be sitting on the wrong part of the curve for far longer than the model would suggest.
3. Why didn’t the same pattern show up as clearly in Bangladesh or Vietnam, which had similar growth profiles over comparable periods?

Trying to understand whether this is a known puzzle with a settled explanation or genuinely contested.

reddit.com
u/Downtown-Art2865 — 17 days ago

didn’t really plan it. started using Wispr Flow for slack replies because typing them felt slow, then it crept into emails, then talking to claude, then rough draft blog posts. the screenshots above are from this morning and I genuinely didn’t realize the number was that high.
the weird part is I’m not a slow typer. 83 wpm is fine. but voice + reformatting is just a different gear once you stop fighting it.

what surprised me most is how good the cleanup has gotten. I ramble, half-finish sentences, change direction mid-thought, and it still comes out readable on the other side.

I’ve also been poking at VoiceInk lately, which is open-source on github and runs whisper locally. paid app for the polished build, but you can compile from source. accuracy is genuinely close to the paid tools and nothing leaves your mac, which is the part that keeps pulling me back.

few open questions:

  1. is anyone here fully on a local setup? whisper.cpp + something custom, or just VoiceInk?
  2. for people on Wispr or Superwhisper — does the cloud reformatting actually justify staying paid, or is local catching up?

curious what everyone’s running these days.

u/Downtown-Art2865 — 18 days ago
▲ 250 r/antiai

LLMs are great for repetition and speed, but good juniors become seniors, ideas, and long-term leverage. Cost optimization can miss value optimization.

Original Post

u/Downtown-Art2865 — 20 days ago
▲ 12 r/macapps

macfolio.com showed up in my feed today. Decent looking site, covers apps, hardware, desk stuff, books. Spent some time on it.

Noticed TypoTab is in the catalog. Same person who runs the directory built TypoTab. No "made by us" tag, no disclosure, just sitting in there next to everything else. The Featured section has a small "may include paid promotions" line, and outbound links route through their own shortener with UTM tracking.

Is that normal for curation sites now or am I being weird about it?

u/Downtown-Art2865 — 20 days ago
▲ 3 r/swift+1 crossposts

every resource I find says ScreenCaptureKit ignores sharingType = .none on macOS 15+ and captures the composited framebuffer anyway. okay, fair.

but then how is Cluely working? their whole product is hiding a window from recordings. and they’re not alone, there are a handful of apps doing exactly this, shipped, in production, apparently fine.

I’m building something where this needs to actually hold. “probably works” isn’t good enough for my use case. so I can’t figure out if the breakage is rare, recorder-specific, or if these products are just quietly shipping with a known hole.

has anyone actually seen it break? which macOS version, which recorder?​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

u/Downtown-Art2865 — 21 days ago