u/DependentAd3051

All parents have a responsibility to support their children, not just emotionally, but financially, beyond the arbitrary cutoff of 18. The idea, common in many Western societies, that parental obligation suddenly expires the moment a child becomes legally an adult is, frankly, deeply disturbing.

From a moral standpoint, if you choose to bring a child into the world, you are choosing to take responsibility for their wellbeing. That responsibility doesn’t come with an expiry date. A child did not ask to be born, you made that decision. So framing support as something optional after 18, or worse, as something the child should feel indebted for, misses the point entirely.

Love and care in parenting should be unconditional. Expecting repayment, gratitude in a transactional sense, or early independence as proof of worth reflects a misunderstanding of what parenting is supposed to be. If your expectation is that your child “owes” you for raising them, then it’s worth asking: did you have a child to nurture and protect them, or to fulfil some personal expectation of return?

Financial independence is not something that appears overnight. The modern world is expensive, competitive, and unforgiving: housing costs, education, basic living expenses have all made it significantly harder for young adults to stabilise themselves immediately after turning 18. To push someone into that reality without a safety net, simply because “that’s how it’s done back in the old days,” is not teaching resilience, it’s exposing them to unnecessary risk.

If anything, real responsibility means preparing your child properly: investing in their education, their stability, and their transition into adulthood. Support doesn’t have to mean indefinite dependence, but it does mean not abandoning them at a fixed age just to satisfy a cultural norm.

And if someone knows they cannot or will not provide that continued support, then they should seriously reconsider having children in the first place. Because raising a child isn’t just about getting them to adulthood,it’s about ensuring they can actually survive and function once they get there.

Treating 18 as the finish line of parenting isn’t responsibility.

It’s convenience disguised as principle.

Hear me out before you attack me. I also want to emphasise that this opinion is only applicable to women in Western societies.

From what I’ve seen so far, I’ve noticed far too many women lacking self-respect in the way they approach relationships and intimacy. There are obviously many factors that contribute to this, but one of the biggest, in my view, is the way media has pushed the illusion of “love is love” or some idealised version of “true love” into our minds. It often encourages emotional decision-making detached from standards, boundaries, or self-worth.

Let me give an example. I knew a girl who met a guy at a social setting. She didn’t even like him. On top of that, he openly expressed homophobic and misogynistic views and even said something as absurd as weed can cure autism. Despite knowing all of this, she still made out with him.

And that made me think— Why the hell would you do that? Why willingly give your time, attention, and physical intimacy to someone who clearly doesn’t respect you or others like you? At that point, it’s not about misunderstanding his character, she saw it clearly and still chose to engage.

In fact, what hurts more is she isn’t a rare case. Situations like this make me question whether some women are being conditioned to prioritise validation, attention, or fleeting connection over self-respect and standards. If someone shows you who they are, especially in such a blatantly negative way, why are we ignoring it?

I’m not saying this applies to all women, but it happens often enough to raise concern. Respect should be the baseline, not something optional. And choosing to overlook blatant disrespect isn’t empowerment, it’s self-neglect.