u/CurrencyAcademic8075

Besides the obvious (getting pregnant), what are some of the side effects you have noticed when stopping birth control. Did the menstrual symptoms persist after stopping? I started it because my cramps and bleeding were out of control. I was bed bound for 2 days every time my period started, and I was using 6+ super+ tampons a day for the first 3 days. Taking the birth control basically saved my life for the last 4+ years. I stopped after my last dose a few months ago, because of the risk of cancer associated with the one I was on (Yasmin). Can anyone tell me about their experience stopping? Thanks girls :)

Besides the obvious (getting pregnant), what are some of the side effects you have noticed when stopping birth control. Did the menstrual symptoms persist after stopping? I started it because my cramps and bleeding were out of control. I was bed bound for 2 days every time my period started, and I was using 6+ super+ tampons a day for the first 3 days. Taking the birth control basically saved my life for the last 4+ years. I stopped after my last dose a few months ago, because of the risk of cancer associated with the one I was on (Yasmin). Can anyone tell me about their experience stopping? Thanks girls :) -A

*NOT A LAWER OR LAW STUDENT*
I read a few articles about this and a case in brief, but I’m still very confused about this ruling and “time of crime” concept. It seems like the man who SA’d his wife did get charged. I thought that the time of the crime (in a case like this),doesn’t really matter unless the accused has a good alibi. You’re not exactly looking at the clock to see what time you’re being r**** at. I’m pretty sure your girlfriend giving you an alibi in a case against your wife doesn’t hold much weight? Just like your husband, mother, sibling, child, etc, is not a good alibi. Can someone please explain WHY this made it to the SCC, and WHAT the ruling means?
Thanks, A

*NOT A LAWER OR LAW STUDENT*
I read a few articles about this and a case in brief, but I’m still very confused about this ruling and “time of crime” concept. It seems like the man who SA’d his wife did get charged. I thought that the time of the crime (in a case like this),doesn’t really matter unless the accused has a good alibi. You’re not exactly looking at the clock to see what time you’re being r**** at. I’m pretty sure your girlfriend giving you an alibi in a case against your wife doesn’t hold much weight? Just like your husband, mother, sibling, child, etc, is not a good alibi. Can someone please explain WHY this made it to the SCC, and WHAT the ruling means?
Thanks, A

*NOT A LAWER OR LAW STUDENT*
I read a few articles about this and a case in brief, but I’m still very confused about this ruling and “time of crime” concept. It seems like the man who SA’d his wife did get charged. I thought that the time of the crime (in a case like this),doesn’t really matter unless the accused has a good alibi. You’re not exactly looking at the clock to see what time you’re being r**** at. I’m pretty sure your girlfriend giving you an alibi in a case against your wife doesn’t hold much weight? Just like your husband, mother, sibling, child, etc, is not a good alibi. Can someone please explain WHY this made it to the SCC, and WHAT the ruling means?
Thanks, A