
Since its implementation in the 1990s, mounting research has shown it promotes self-sufficiency and keeps people housed. Housing First is 88% more effective at curbing homelessness than Treatment First.
About 98% of people enrolled in Permanent Supportive Housing stay in their homes one year after being housed, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness.
However, the current HUD administration wants to walk away from the model.
The thinking is that people should have to get treatment before qualifying for housing. I'm sure not all housing-first participants succeed, especially those who suffer from substance abuse, mental illness or other health issues. But is it truly housing first that is to blame, or are people not getting proper treatment after they are housed?
I know these issues vary by region, so I'd value a nuanced analysis on some of the benefits and shortfalls of housing first in your area.