u/BeneficialThroat3509

Femcel Logic: Cherry-Picking ‘Nature’ to Fit a Narrative

Femcel Logic: Cherry-Picking ‘Nature’ to Fit a Narrative

Just Read This Comment by a Femcel -

So if we go by this logic, she wants the old system, which was based on power structures and not democracy. So why do these femcels complain about that same system, where men had multiple wives, while completely ignoring the fact that those women married powerful or rich men for the same reason. portraying them as victims when they are the ones benefiting from it?

Aren’t all these femcels always talking about how men are responsible for war and injustice? I mean do you have a consistent ideology, or just go with whatever benefits you.

u/BeneficialThroat3509 — 11 hours ago

So Women Can Hit Men, But Men Can’t Defend Themselves?

So I came across this creator’s reel on Instagram, and the very first thing I heard was her arguing about men saying they can hit women in return. And this dumbfuck is portraying it as if it’s wrong. Later she may have made some good points, but what’s the point of starting the video by supporting abuse against men? Then they ask why men don’t support it.

And the audacity to then pin such comments as shown in the screenshot, how the hell is it okay for women to hit men but men not act in return? I think they deliberately add this shit to normalize it in the name of feminism.

If a man had supported something like this, would you all be fine with that? Here, these dumbfucks are not even just supporting it, they’re justifying it.,

what kind of justification is it, anyone hit by kids mostly won't respond cause they still are learning how to behave, that can't be justification for women hitting men (until there's legitimate reason) and not expecting its consequences, what does that even mean you dont heat something weaker than them, You should not be hitting anyone irrespective of weaker and stronger, and if you did, dont get under lame logic to not get anything in return.

u/BeneficialThroat3509 — 4 days ago