u/Begle1

The Leatherwood ART (Automatic Ranging Telescope) off the M21 Sniper Weapon System; is the concept of a scope that automatically adjusts elevation as you change magnification a technological dead end?

These scopes seem like such a practical idea to me. If you know the size of your target, you adjust your magnification until the unchanging (second focal plane) scale on your reticle matches the size of your target. So you adjust magnification until the 18" ruler on the reticle lines up with your 18" wide target. As you do this, the scope automatically adjusts elevation, according to a mechanical cam profiled to match the ballistics of the gun and ammo you're using. Then you worry about wind dope, and pull the trigger.

From what I read these scopes were designed and made by Mr Leatherwood and issued by the US military in Vietnam, and apparently weren't that well received due to durability problems.

But the underlying theory seems sound. The alternatives involves ranging with a reticle or other method, then remembering what your bullet drop at that range is, and then dialing elevation manually or compensating for your drop on a complicated reticle. The Leatherwood ART system makes the process simpler and remembers elevation dope for you, and the mechanical "cam-puter" could be disengaged to revert back to standard scope adjustments.

As far as I can tell the only company using this technology today is a company called Hi-Lux, which I gather is using it on Chinese-made scopes that don't have the best reputation.

Has this technology ever been used elsewhere?

Seems like there'd be more of a market for a high quality version of this product, with custom-ground cams to ballistically match whatever somebody was shooting.

Here are a couple of Hi-Lux's videos showing off their contemporary version of this scope, and showing how to shoot with it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MbHIFMZHdM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WEqAjajokSw

reddit.com
u/Begle1 — 10 hours ago

How does the eyebox, clarity and brightness compare between an SWFA Ultralight 2.5-10x32 and a good LPVO like a PLXc 1-8x24?

I'm waffling between an SWFA Ultralight 2.5-10 with a red dot on top, versus a good LPVO like a PLXc.

I've watched and carefully compared the C_DOES videos, but am still wondering if I can get some first-hand testimony on how these scopes would compare in terms of eyebox, clarity and light collection in the 8-10x magnification range.

reddit.com
u/Begle1 — 3 days ago
▲ 9 r/AUG

Has anybody weighed these barrels? How does it change the felt balance?

I think what I really want is a standard-profiled 18" 1:8 barrel. Since I don't have that, I'm agonizing to decide which way to go.

reddit.com
u/Begle1 — 7 days ago
▲ 2 r/AUG

I know that common knowledge says 1:9 twist is too slow for 77 grain 5.56 bullets. But playing around with the Berger bullet stability calculator and it doesn't seem so bad, it says they stabilize in my conditions.

Seems like generally speaking some 1:9 barrels handle the 77's alright and some don't.

Anybody have experience with 77's through the 1:9 AUG barrels in particular?

reddit.com
u/Begle1 — 11 days ago