u/BaseDisastrous2151

This is some of the worst writing ever.

of course i did not have high hopes after the last 6 but episode 7 once again felt like filler.

seriously what even happened? i just watched it and i can barely recall anything.

they finished the kimiko uranium mechanism which wasnt tested or anything, starlight and some side characters got into a fight, and MORE FUCKING TALKING IN A ROOM. THIS SHOW IS JUST TALKING IN A ROOM FOR 10 MINUTES AT A TIME.

LISTEN WRITERS. WHERE IS THE FUCKING HOMELANDER SPACE SHOT FROM THE POSTERS? WHY IS THIS DICKSPLAT TRYING TO OPEN A THEME PARK? WHY EVEN DO THE STUPID CLARA BULLSHIT? WE HAVENT GIVEN A FUCK ABOUT STORMFRONT SINCE SHE DIED.

WE ONLY CARE ABOUT BUTCHER, HOMELANDER, AND WATCHING SOME COOL SHIT HAPPEN. A WAR BETWEEN THE BOYS AND SUPERHEROES. WHERE IS IT?

this is a JOKE. sunken cost fallacy at its finest. i doubt e8 can really redeem my hatred for this show. i stuck around because s1-3 were good but this is fucked up.

shame on you amazon writers

If you promote any political party, support any politician, and worse of all actually believe what they say, then you are a mind controlled brainwashed slave.

It doesn't matter. I myself do not give a fuck about politics. Let alone society. My dream is to distance myself as far away from it as possible, in the mean time I will ignore all this news about Donald fuck said blah blah blah.

I just hate you all

I'm 18 and this diet has improved my facial skin decently but it's still kinda early

I wonder if like one or two pimples a week is just inevitable especially if I have all these things I used to eat still stored in me?

im not on a strict ketogenic diet but i am wondering, biochemically wise, how weight gain works on a diet where you consume 70-80% of your macronutrients as fat.

i hope to establish that calories are an inaccurate, flawed, and invalid mechanism to determine the energy intake and expenditure of a human. nothing is burnt inside the body and its not any law of thermodynamics relevant to a human.

that being said, my main question is if someone were to eat 100 grams of hypothetically pure fat, and 100g of carbohydrate, which one would cause them to store more body fat solely from the intake of that mass? (not accounting for insulin)

what about a diet with the exact same amount of mass, one consisting of 60% fat, 30% protein, 10% carbs VS 30% fat, 20% protein, 50% carbs. will they store more body fat on the second one because of the insulin responses or will it be the same just more water weight. assuming this is ALSO IMPORTANTLY in a "surplus"

this mainly comes from many anecdotes i have read where people consume well over 3000-4000 "calories" worth of food on a carnivore or keto diet (they are pretty similar inherently) and they manage to lose weight. yes a lot is probably water and any other waste material but also there are stories of fat loss.

i apologise if this question isnt worded the best but if anything is unclear i can try explain more

We consume mass. Mass in mass out. We are not an oven which burns matter into heat.

That being established, I want someone who agrees with this objective fact to explain if someone were to eat 100 grams of pure fat (which has 900 kcal supposedly) versus 100 grams of pure carbohydrate (supposed 400 kcal), would the fat cause you to gain more weight?

I've never really seen this question to be answered. I don't want stupid calorie in calorie out explanations, I want someone who understands biochemistry to answer