Gangstalking: A Critique of the Psychiatric Response
The term "gangstalking" seems to be used as a scapegoat by psychiatrists who are either part of an undeniable pyramid scheme to push pharmaceutical drugs for profit, or who simply don't fully understand the situation and feel the need to maintain a status of being more intelligent than their patients. It is hard to ignore that their profession is heavily influenced by the pharmaceutical industry, especially considering the commissions and bonuses associated with specific brands. While I didn't attend college for psychology, my sister did; I have studied many of her textbooks and researched neuroscience on my own, so I have a very good sense of when "professionals" are being untruthful with me.
Understandably, targeted individuals are under severe stress and are often distracted, which means their speech may not always align properly with what they are trying to communicate. The idea that this is all reinforced by online communities or "hypochondria"—an easy, less terrifying answer for psychiatrists—is complete bullshit. When you have a detailed list of very specific things happening to you, and you come across the gangstalking phenomenon a year later with no prior outside influence, only to find it aligns word-for-word with your experience, what do you call that? Is it hundreds of thousands of people having an identical mass hallucination, even though half of them have no prior mental health issues? There are people with PhDs, well-respected doctors, military officials, and average Joes who go from normal everyday life to being bombarded by loud, digital-sounding voices in their heads 24/7.
Why are these people being discredited? Is it because the technology doesn’t exist? The government and military have held patents for decades on various microwave and radio-based equipment. These range from military weapons to technology that allows the deaf to hear voices, and even applications involving crickets in Jamaica.
Specific evidence of this technology includes:
U.S. Patent 4,877,027: "Hearing System" (1989) – Mentions using microwave pulses to induce auditory perception.
U.S. Patent 4,858,612: "Hearing Device" (1989) – Outlines RF auditory transmission concepts.
U.S. Patent 6,470,214: "Method and Device for Implementing the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect" (2002) – Assigned to the U.S. Air Force, detailing speech communication via RF.
U.S. Patent 6,587,729: "Apparatus for Audibly Communicating Speech Using the Radio Frequency Hearing Effect" (2003).
The main issue is not whether this tech exists, but how little the general population knows about RF frequencies and microwaves. As a former tech at Verizon, I often ask people how they think their cellphones receive full-length videos or games almost instantaneously through the air. Most people either don’t know or guess incorrectly. Towers produce microwave radiation, and your phone picks up that signal. Examples of microwave radiation being used on humans already exist, such as the large disks used for crowd control. Every person produces their own electromagnetic field, and we already know that certain frequencies can disrupt or alter our cells. For example, 18 Hz is just below the threshold of human hearing, and some suggest that subliminal messages or hypnosis can be achieved at that frequency. A great example of sound being transmitted directly into the skull is bone-conduction headphones; you can place them anywhere on your head and the sound is heard just as clearly as if it were in your ears.
Yes, I am a Targeted Individual. I have gone through countless therapists, psychiatrists, and medications. I began reaching my own conclusions because nothing they told me aligned with my actual experiences. The timing of these events was extremely suspicious, occurring during a very positive turning point in my life—the opposite of a post-traumatic trigger. It felt as though they ignored what I told them and tried to manipulate me into believing things that didn't happen just to categorize me.
I’m sure not all psychiatrists are like this, and I would love to engage in an intelligent debate based on the actual facts of this phenomenon rather than stereotypical categorization. I would love to elaborate more for anyone with an open, unbiased mind. I am not interested in hearing from "pill-pushers" who have ego issues or lack a basic understanding of sound frequencies and how mobile technology works. If they don't understand the tech, they aren't qualified to claim it doesn't exist. I understand they are doing their jobs within certain limitations, but they cannot help with legitimate cases of electronic torture. I am happy to break down each category and logically explain the "who, what, how, and why." I am even willing to be proven wrong, provided the counter-arguments are based on logical facts from someone who truly understands radio frequency and electromagnetics.
Thank you for allowing me to post this.