Since the moderators think that naming a massive corporation in a legal advice sub is a crime, let’s talk about "Company N".
I have a documented legal dispute involving EU Directive 2011/83/EU and the European Consumer Centre (Case ECCPL-81799). "Company N" refuses a 170 PLN refund for an auto-renewal, despite their own Transaction Statement clearly outlining the "Effects of Cancellation" and a proportional refund policy.
Apparently, pointing out corporate law-breaking is "too controversial" if you name the culprit. So here I am, following the "clear rules":
• The Subject: A Japanese gaming giant.
• The Issue: Blatant violation of 14-day withdrawal rights in the EU.
• The Support: Agents "A" and "W" giving copy-paste illegal excuses.
I’ve already moved to a certain portable PC platform developed by Valve (is naming Valve allowed, or is that also a violation of the sacred scrolls?).
To the mods: Censoring documented consumer rights cases under the guise of "no naming" doesn't protect the sub; it protects the scammers. I’m taking my money back via chargeback anyway.
If anyone wants the full story (with the forbidden names), find me on r/SteamDeck or r/Gaming, where consumer advocacy actually matters.
Peace out to this corporate-friendly echo chamber.