u/Adept-Engine5606

There is something the UFO community seriously needs to understand.

People keep saying, “The US government is hiding UFO knowledge.” Others blame the Pentagon. Others blame Majestic 12. But nobody wants to say the deeper truth directly.

Who were the people inside those systems?

What religion did they follow?

What worldview shaped their minds before they ever touched UFO information?

Look at the Majestic 12 group carefully. Every single member of Majestic 12 came from a Christian background. All of them. These were not spiritually neutral people. They were military men, intelligence officials, scientists, and political figures shaped by a Christian worldview long before they were ever exposed to UFO information.

Look at the intelligence community. Look at the military leadership. Look at American politics in general. Most of them were Christians. The United States itself was built on a Christian foundation, and its institutions were shaped by Christian thinking for generations.

So why are people acting surprised that UFO knowledge was buried, feared, classified, demonized, and hidden?

Christianity already had a framework for this. Anything non-human, anything coming from the sky, anything outside official religion, anything beyond human understanding was automatically pushed into the category of “demonic,” “dangerous,” “deception,” or “against God.”

That mindset affects decisions.

That mindset affects disclosure.

That mindset affects what information humanity is allowed to see.

And then look at the Vatican. For centuries they collected secret texts, hidden records, banned books, and ancient knowledge inside their archives. Even today the Vatican is still withholding information from humanity. Why is that never questioned deeply enough?

People are afraid to say this because Christianity is treated like a protected subject in the West. But if you are serious about UFO disclosure, then you cannot avoid talking about religion anymore.

And let’s be direct about it.

If it is not the US government, the Pentagon, or Majestic 12 that are truly keeping the truth hidden, then who is it?

They are none other than Christians.

It is better to name things exactly as they are. That helps immensely. You cannot solve a problem if you refuse to identify the real source of it.

For decades people kept attacking “the government” while ignoring the belief systems controlling the minds of the people inside those governments.

The UFO community has been fighting the wrong enemy this whole time.

In fact, many people in the UFO community probably never even correctly identified who the enemy was in the first place.

They kept blaming structures, agencies, and institutions without looking at the ideology shaping the people inside them.

People keep fighting for UFO disclosure, but think about this for a moment.

If you are a devout Christian, and you somehow come into possession of real UFO knowledge, would you openly disclose it if it directly contradicts your belief system? It would go against everything you were taught about reality, God, and the nature of existence. In most cases, the answer would not be yes.

These simple questions already explain the entire problem.

The issue is not just the government.

The issue is the religion they follow.

And most of them have been Christians.

The Pentagon is not some supernatural being. Majestic 12 is not some magical force floating in space. They are human beings shaped by religious beliefs, fears, and doctrines.

And when those beliefs teach people to fear unknown intelligences, fear contact, fear higher knowledge, fear beings outside their religious system, then of course secrecy happens.

Of course suppression happens.

Of course disclosure gets delayed for decades.

So if you are going to fight against the enemy, first you have to know who the enemy is.

You have to identify the mindset that fears knowledge itself.

You have to identify the worldview that labels unknown intelligences as evil before investigation even begins.

And until people start addressing the real problem instead of attacking the wrong target, humanity is never going to get full disclosure and will never be able to truly solve the problem.

There is something the UFO community seriously needs to understand.

People keep saying, “The US government is hiding UFO knowledge.” Others blame the Pentagon. Others blame Majestic 12. But nobody wants to say the deeper truth directly.

Who were the people inside those systems?

What religion did they follow?

What worldview shaped their minds before they ever touched UFO information?

Look at the Majestic 12 group carefully. Every single member of Majestic 12 came from a Christian background. All of them. These were not spiritually neutral people. They were military men, intelligence officials, scientists, and political figures shaped by a Christian worldview long before they were ever exposed to UFO information.

Look at the intelligence community. Look at the military leadership. Look at American politics in general. Most of them were Christians. The United States itself was built on a Christian foundation, and its institutions were shaped by Christian thinking for generations.

So why are people acting surprised that UFO knowledge was buried, feared, classified, demonized, and hidden?

Christianity already had a framework for this. Anything non-human, anything coming from the sky, anything outside official religion, anything beyond human understanding was automatically pushed into the category of “demonic,” “dangerous,” “deception,” or “against God.”

That mindset affects decisions.

That mindset affects disclosure.

That mindset affects what information humanity is allowed to see.

And then look at the Vatican. For centuries they collected secret texts, hidden records, banned books, and ancient knowledge inside their archives. Even today the Vatican is still withholding information from humanity. Why is that never questioned deeply enough?

People are afraid to say this because Christianity is treated like a protected subject in the West. But if you are serious about UFO disclosure, then you cannot avoid talking about religion anymore.

And let’s be direct about it.

If it is not the US government, the Pentagon, or Majestic 12 that are truly keeping the truth hidden, then who is it?

They are none other than Christians.

It is better to name things exactly as they are. That helps immensely. You cannot solve a problem if you refuse to identify the real source of it.

For decades people kept attacking “the government” while ignoring the belief systems controlling the minds of the people inside those governments.

The UFO community has been fighting the wrong enemy this whole time.

In fact, many people in the UFO community probably never even correctly identified who the enemy was in the first place.

They kept blaming structures, agencies, and institutions without looking at the ideology shaping the people inside them.

People keep fighting for UFO disclosure, but think about this for a moment.

If you are a devout Christian, and you somehow come into possession of real UFO knowledge, would you openly disclose it if it directly contradicts your belief system? It would go against everything you were taught about reality, God, and the nature of existence. In most cases, the answer would not be yes.

These simple questions already explain the entire problem.

The issue is not just the government.

The issue is the religion they follow.

And most of them have been Christians.

The Pentagon is not some supernatural being. Majestic 12 is not some magical force floating in space. They are human beings shaped by religious beliefs, fears, and doctrines.

And when those beliefs teach people to fear unknown intelligences, fear contact, fear higher knowledge, fear beings outside their religious system, then of course secrecy happens.

Of course suppression happens.

Of course disclosure gets delayed for decades.

So if you are going to fight against the enemy, first you have to know who the enemy is.

You have to identify the mindset that fears knowledge itself.

You have to identify the worldview that labels unknown intelligences as evil before investigation even begins.

And until people start addressing the real problem instead of attacking the wrong target, humanity is never going to get full disclosure and will never be able to truly solve the problem.

There is something the UFO community seriously needs to understand.

People keep saying, “The US government is hiding UFO knowledge.” Others blame the Pentagon. Others blame Majestic 12. But nobody wants to say the deeper truth directly.

Who were the people inside those systems?

What religion did they follow?

What worldview shaped their minds before they ever touched UFO information?

Look at the Majestic 12 group carefully. Every single member of Majestic 12 came from a Christian background. All of them. These were not spiritually neutral people. They were military men, intelligence officials, scientists, and political figures shaped by a Christian worldview long before they were ever exposed to UFO information.

Look at the intelligence community. Look at the military leadership. Look at American politics in general. Most of them were Christians. The United States itself was built on a Christian foundation, and its institutions were shaped by Christian thinking for generations.

So why are people acting surprised that UFO knowledge was buried, feared, classified, demonized, and hidden?

Christianity already had a framework for this. Anything non-human, anything coming from the sky, anything outside official religion, anything beyond human understanding was automatically pushed into the category of “demonic,” “dangerous,” “deception,” or “against God.”

That mindset affects decisions.

That mindset affects disclosure.

That mindset affects what information humanity is allowed to see.

And then look at the Vatican. For centuries they collected secret texts, hidden records, banned books, and ancient knowledge inside their archives. Even today the Vatican is still withholding information from humanity. Why is that never questioned deeply enough?

People are afraid to say this because Christianity is treated like a protected subject in the West. But if you are serious about UFO disclosure, then you cannot avoid talking about religion anymore.

And let’s be direct about it.

If it is not the US government, the Pentagon, or Majestic 12 that are truly keeping the truth hidden, then who is it?

They are none other than Christians.

It is better to name things exactly as they are. That helps immensely. You cannot solve a problem if you refuse to identify the real source of it.

For decades people kept attacking “the government” while ignoring the belief systems controlling the minds of the people inside those governments.

The UFO community has been fighting the wrong enemy this whole time.

In fact, many people in the UFO community probably never even correctly identified who the enemy was in the first place.

They kept blaming structures, agencies, and institutions without looking at the ideology shaping the people inside them.

People keep fighting for UFO disclosure, but think about this for a moment.

If you are a devout Christian, and you somehow come into possession of real UFO knowledge, would you openly disclose it if it directly contradicts your belief system? It would go against everything you were taught about reality, God, and the nature of existence. In most cases, the answer would not be yes.

These simple questions already explain the entire problem.

The issue is not just the government.

The issue is the religion they follow.

And most of them have been Christians.

The Pentagon is not some supernatural being. Majestic 12 is not some magical force floating in space. They are human beings shaped by religious beliefs, fears, and doctrines.

And when those beliefs teach people to fear unknown intelligences, fear contact, fear higher knowledge, fear beings outside their religious system, then of course secrecy happens.

Of course suppression happens.

Of course disclosure gets delayed for decades.

So if you are going to fight against the enemy, first you have to know who the enemy is.

You have to identify the mindset that fears knowledge itself.

You have to identify the worldview that labels unknown intelligences as evil before investigation even begins.

And until people start addressing the real problem instead of attacking the wrong target, humanity is never going to get full disclosure and will never be able to truly solve the problem.

I’ve been thinking deeply about a core difference between the teachings of and Advaita Vedanta (as taught by ), and I’d really like to hear your perspectives.

From what I understand, the Buddha clearly rejected the idea of any permanent, unchanging self — even a subtle or ultimate one. His teaching of anattā (no-self) denies that anything, including consciousness, can be considered a true Self.

On the other hand, Advaita Vedanta asserts that there is an ultimate Self (Ātman), identical with Brahman — eternal, unchanging, and the true nature of reality.

So this seems like a direct contradiction:

• Buddhism → no self at all
• Advaita → ultimate Self is the only reality

If truth is ultimately one and cannot contradict itself, then one of these must be closer to the truth (or at least more logically consistent).

So my question is:

Which teaching is actually more true or higher?

Is Buddha’s complete rejection of any self the more radical and accurate insight? Or is Advaita’s realization of a universal Self the deeper truth?

I’m not looking for a diplomatic answer like “both are the same.” I’m genuinely asking for clear reasoning, logic, or direct experience.

Curious to hear your thoughts.

I’ve been thinking deeply about a core difference between the teachings of and Advaita Vedanta (as taught by ), and I’d really like to hear your perspectives.

From what I understand, the Buddha clearly rejected the idea of any permanent, unchanging self — even a subtle or ultimate one. His teaching of anattā (no-self) denies that anything, including consciousness, can be considered a true Self.

On the other hand, Advaita Vedanta asserts that there is an ultimate Self (Ātman), identical with Brahman — eternal, unchanging, and the true nature of reality.

So this seems like a direct contradiction:

• Buddhism → no self at all
• Advaita → ultimate Self is the only reality

If truth is ultimately one and cannot contradict itself, then one of these must be closer to the truth (or at least more logically consistent).

So my question is:

Which teaching is actually more true or higher?

Is Buddha’s complete rejection of any self the more radical and accurate insight? Or is Advaita’s realization of a universal Self the deeper truth?

I’m not looking for a diplomatic answer like “both are the same.” I’m genuinely asking for clear reasoning, logic, or direct experience.

Curious to hear your thoughts.

Which religion do you think has produced the most enlightened people, and why do you think that? Curious to hear your reasoning, whether it’s based on teachings, practices, historical figures, or personal interpretation.

Which religion do you think has produced the most enlightened people, and why do you think that? Curious to hear your reasoning, whether it’s based on teachings, practices, historical figures, or personal interpretation.

Which religion do you think has produced the most enlightened people, and why do you think that? Curious to hear your reasoning, whether it’s based on teachings, practices, historical figures, or personal interpretation.

I’ve been thinking about something and wanted to ask this here.

Gautama Buddha attained enlightenment and taught the Dharma. He also spoke about previous Buddhas—beings who appeared long before him across vast periods of time and who also turned the wheel of Dharma.

So my question is: did Buddha attain something higher or more fundamental than figures like Krishna, Shiva, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, or Durga?

Because when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas, he doesn’t seem to mention Krishna, Shiva, or similar figures. If these beings are considered central or supreme in other traditions, why don’t they appear in the lineage of Buddhas?

From what I understand, Buddhas seem to play a major role in “turning the wheel of Dharma,” and they appear only once in very vast time periods. In comparison, within Indian spiritual cosmology, it feels like figures such as Shiva, Krishna, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, Durga, and others might exist in the gaps between these Buddhas—but don’t seem to play as central a role in this specific function.

So is that why Buddha didn’t mention them? Because their roles are different or smaller in that specific context?

Another thing I’m curious about: in Hindu traditions, there is often the claim that their religion and practices like meditation are extremely ancient, and that these belong to their tradition. But when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas existing across immense stretches of time, it makes it seem like the lineage of Buddhas is even older than what we typically think of as Hinduism.

So does that mean the Buddhist framework is describing a much larger cycle, where what we call “Hinduism” is just one part within that bigger picture?

In other words, it feels like Buddhas play the key role in turning the wheel of Dharma across vast cosmic time, while other traditions and figures might be smaller parts within that overall process.

Is this a correct way to understand it, or am I missing something?

I’ve been thinking about something and wanted to ask this here.

Gautama Buddha attained enlightenment and taught the Dharma. He also spoke about previous Buddhas—beings who appeared long before him across vast periods of time and who also turned the wheel of Dharma.

So my question is: did Buddha attain something higher or more fundamental than figures like Krishna, Shiva, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, or Durga?

Because when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas, he doesn’t seem to mention Krishna, Shiva, or similar figures. If these beings are considered central or supreme in other traditions, why don’t they appear in the lineage of Buddhas?

From what I understand, Buddhas seem to play a major role in “turning the wheel of Dharma,” and they appear only once in very vast time periods. In comparison, within Indian spiritual cosmology, it feels like figures such as Shiva, Krishna, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, Durga, and others might exist in the gaps between these Buddhas—but don’t seem to play as central a role in this specific function.

So is that why Buddha didn’t mention them? Because their roles are different or smaller in that specific context?

Another thing I’m curious about: in Hindu traditions, there is often the claim that their religion and practices like meditation are extremely ancient, and that these belong to their tradition. But when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas existing across immense stretches of time, it makes it seem like the lineage of Buddhas is even older than what we typically think of as Hinduism.

So does that mean the Buddhist framework is describing a much larger cycle, where what we call “Hinduism” is just one part within that bigger picture?

In other words, it feels like Buddhas play the key role in turning the wheel of Dharma across vast cosmic time, while other traditions and figures might be smaller parts within that overall process.

Is this a correct way to understand it, or am I missing something?

I’ve been thinking about something and wanted to ask this here.

Gautama Buddha attained enlightenment and taught the Dharma. He also spoke about previous Buddhas—beings who appeared long before him across vast periods of time and who also turned the wheel of Dharma.

So my question is: did Buddha attain something higher or more fundamental than figures like Krishna, Shiva, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, or Durga?

Because when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas, he doesn’t seem to mention Krishna, Shiva, or similar figures. If these beings are considered central or supreme in other traditions, why don’t they appear in the lineage of Buddhas?

From what I understand, Buddhas seem to play a major role in “turning the wheel of Dharma,” and they appear only once in very vast time periods. In comparison, within Indian spiritual cosmology, it feels like figures such as Shiva, Krishna, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, Durga, and others might exist in the gaps between these Buddhas—but don’t seem to play as central a role in this specific function.

So is that why Buddha didn’t mention them? Because their roles are different or smaller in that specific context?

Another thing I’m curious about: in Hindu traditions, there is often the claim that their religion and practices like meditation are extremely ancient, and that these belong to their tradition. But when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas existing across immense stretches of time, it makes it seem like the lineage of Buddhas is even older than what we typically think of as Hinduism.

So does that mean the Buddhist framework is describing a much larger cycle, where what we call “Hinduism” is just one part within that bigger picture?

In other words, it feels like Buddhas play the key role in turning the wheel of Dharma across vast cosmic time, while other traditions and figures might be smaller parts within that overall process.

Is this a correct way to understand it, or am I missing something?

I’ve been thinking about something and wanted to ask this here.

Gautama Buddha attained enlightenment and taught the Dharma. He also spoke about previous Buddhas—beings who appeared long before him across vast periods of time and who also turned the wheel of Dharma.

So my question is: did Buddha attain something higher or more fundamental than figures like Krishna, Shiva, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, or Durga?

Because when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas, he doesn’t seem to mention Krishna, Shiva, or similar figures. If these beings are considered central or supreme in other traditions, why don’t they appear in the lineage of Buddhas?

From what I understand, Buddhas seem to play a major role in “turning the wheel of Dharma,” and they appear only once in very vast time periods. In comparison, within Indian spiritual cosmology, it feels like figures such as Shiva, Krishna, Vishnu, Brahma, Indra, Durga, and others might exist in the gaps between these Buddhas—but don’t seem to play as central a role in this specific function.

So is that why Buddha didn’t mention them? Because their roles are different or smaller in that specific context?

Another thing I’m curious about: in Hindu traditions, there is often the claim that their religion and practices like meditation are extremely ancient, and that these belong to their tradition. But when Buddha talks about previous Buddhas existing across immense stretches of time, it makes it seem like the lineage of Buddhas is even older than what we typically think of as Hinduism.

So does that mean the Buddhist framework is describing a much larger cycle, where what we call “Hinduism” is just one part within that bigger picture?

In other words, it feels like Buddhas play the key role in turning the wheel of Dharma across vast cosmic time, while other traditions and figures might be smaller parts within that overall process.

Is this a correct way to understand it, or am I missing something?

Lately I’ve been seeing more people report that through meditation or expanded states of awareness, they’ve experienced contact with non-human intelligences (ETs, entities, or telepathic communication).

This made me think specifically about Buddhism, which has been focused on meditation and the exploration of consciousness for thousands of years. Across generations, many practitioners and masters have worked deeply with awareness, inner experience, and the nature of mind.

So I want to ask a few genuine questions:

Do you think it’s possible that Buddhist masters or practitioners throughout history may have already had contact with such non-human intelligences (ET beings) long ago, and have been exchanging knowledge with them?

If so, do you think they might have been among the earliest “human contact points” with such intelligences?

And if such contact did happen, do you think it’s possible that: – it was shared only within esoteric or inner circles – or it was not shared widely because ordinary people at the time would not have understood it – or it was shared, but later interpreted differently as devas, spirits, or other realms?

And taking it further as a possibility question—do you think there could be any ongoing relationship or cooperation between such intelligences and advanced practitioners, aimed at supporting human consciousness development in ways we are not aware of?

Just genuinely curious how people think about these possibilities within the context of Buddhism and consciousness.

Lately I’ve been seeing more people report that through meditation or expanded states of awareness, they’ve experienced contact with non-human intelligences (ETs, entities, or telepathic communication).

This made me think specifically about Buddhism, which has been focused on meditation and the exploration of consciousness for thousands of years. Across generations, many practitioners and masters have worked deeply with awareness, inner experience, and the nature of mind.

So I want to ask a few genuine questions:

Do you think it’s possible that Buddhist masters or practitioners throughout history may have already had contact with such non-human intelligences (ET beings) long ago, and have been exchanging knowledge with them?

If so, do you think they might have been among the earliest “human contact points” with such intelligences?

And if such contact did happen, do you think it’s possible that: – it was shared only within esoteric or inner circles – or it was not shared widely because ordinary people at the time would not have understood it – or it was shared, but later interpreted differently as devas, spirits, or other realms?

And taking it further as a possibility question—do you think there could be any ongoing relationship or cooperation between such intelligences and advanced practitioners, aimed at supporting human consciousness development in ways we are not aware of?

Just genuinely curious how people think about these possibilities within the context of Buddhism and consciousness.

Lately I’ve been seeing more people report that through meditation or expanded states of awareness, they’ve experienced contact with non-human intelligences (ETs, entities, or telepathic communication).

This made me think specifically about Buddhism, which has been focused on meditation and the exploration of consciousness for thousands of years. Across generations, many practitioners and masters have worked deeply with awareness, inner experience, and the nature of mind.

So I want to ask a few genuine questions:

Do you think it’s possible that Buddhist masters or practitioners throughout history may have already had contact with such non-human intelligences (ET beings) long ago, and have been exchanging knowledge with them?

If so, do you think they might have been among the earliest “human contact points” with such intelligences?

And if such contact did happen, do you think it’s possible that: – it was shared only within esoteric or inner circles – or it was not shared widely because ordinary people at the time would not have understood it – or it was shared, but later interpreted differently as devas, spirits, or other realms?

And taking it further as a possibility question—do you think there could be any ongoing relationship or cooperation between such intelligences and advanced practitioners, aimed at supporting human consciousness development in ways we are not aware of?

Just genuinely curious how people think about these possibilities within the context of Buddhism and consciousness.

Lately I’ve been seeing more people report that through meditation or expanded states of awareness, they’ve experienced contact with non-human intelligences (ETs, entities, or telepathic communication).

This made me think specifically about Buddhism, which has been focused on meditation and the exploration of consciousness for thousands of years. Across generations, many practitioners and masters have worked deeply with awareness, inner experience, and the nature of mind.

So I want to ask a few genuine questions:

Do you think it’s possible that Buddhist masters or practitioners throughout history may have already had contact with such non-human intelligences (ET beings) long ago, and have been exchanging knowledge with them?

If so, do you think they might have been among the earliest “human contact points” with such intelligences?

And if such contact did happen, do you think it’s possible that: – it was shared only within esoteric or inner circles – or it was not shared widely because ordinary people at the time would not have understood it – or it was shared, but later interpreted differently as devas, spirits, or other realms?

And taking it further as a possibility question—do you think there could be any ongoing relationship or cooperation between such intelligences and advanced practitioners, aimed at supporting human consciousness development in ways we are not aware of?

Just genuinely curious how people think about these possibilities within the context of Buddhism and consciousness.

Lately I’ve been seeing more people report that through meditation or expanded states of awareness, they’ve experienced contact with non-human intelligences (ETs, entities, or telepathic communication).

This made me think specifically about Buddhism, which has been focused on meditation and the exploration of consciousness for thousands of years. Across generations, many practitioners and masters have worked deeply with awareness, inner experience, and the nature of mind.

So I want to ask a few genuine questions:

Do you think it’s possible that Buddhist masters or practitioners throughout history may have already had contact with such non-human intelligences (ET beings) long ago, and have been exchanging knowledge with them?

If so, do you think they might have been among the earliest “human contact points” with such intelligences?

And if such contact did happen, do you think it’s possible that: – it was shared only within esoteric or inner circles – or it was not shared widely because ordinary people at the time would not have understood it – or it was shared, but later interpreted differently as devas, spirits, or other realms?

And taking it further as a possibility question—do you think there could be any ongoing relationship or cooperation between such intelligences and advanced practitioners, aimed at supporting human consciousness development in ways we are not aware of?

Just genuinely curious how people think about these possibilities within the context of Buddhism and consciousness.

Lately I’ve been seeing more people report that through meditation or expanded states of awareness, they’ve experienced contact with non-human intelligences (ETs, entities, or telepathic communication).

This made me think specifically about Buddhism, which has been focused on meditation and the exploration of consciousness for thousands of years. Across generations, many practitioners and masters have worked deeply with awareness, inner experience, and the nature of mind.

So I want to ask a few genuine questions:

Do you think it’s possible that Buddhist masters or practitioners throughout history may have already had contact with such non-human intelligences (ET beings) long ago, and have been exchanging knowledge with them?

If so, do you think they might have been among the earliest “human contact points” with such intelligences?

And if such contact did happen, do you think it’s possible that: – it was shared only within esoteric or inner circles – or it was not shared widely because ordinary people at the time would not have understood it – or it was shared, but later interpreted differently as devas, spirits, or other realms?

And taking it further as a possibility question—do you think there could be any ongoing relationship or cooperation between such intelligences and advanced practitioners, aimed at supporting human consciousness development in ways we are not aware of?

Just genuinely curious how people think about these possibilities within the context of Buddhism and consciousness.