Law schools that perform well typically have a student body that performs well.
Students that performed well on the LSAT will likely perform well on the Bar exam.
Students that have a high undergrad gpa will likely perform well at law school.
Students that haven't performed well academically up to this point likely won't perform well in law school.
So T14 schools receive top candidates, admit top candidates, and therefore produce top candidates.
Lower ranked law schools receive underperforming candidates, admit underperforming candidates, and therefore produce underperforming candidates.
Is it not actually a wonderous accomplishment for a school to take a group of underperforming students and have only 20% not pass the bar?
What say ye?
Do we have any evidence to suggest that a high performing candidate will not perform well at an underperforming school?
Do we have any evidence that an underperforming candidate would excel at a high performing school?