u/AISmithStudio — reddlx

Hey r/whowouldwin, I vibe-coded a little “who would win” simulator for fun (Meta Monday)

I built this little thing called OmniVersus...a deterministic browser-based battle simulator with stats, swarm mechanics, traits, infiltration rules, morale breaks, and a bunch of other stuff. It’s fully client-side, seeded (so fights are reproducible), and has a Remix mode where you can tweak stats on the fly.

Try it here: https://omniversus.vercel.app/

I thought it was pretty neat when I finished it… but I quickly realized the real fun of this subreddit has always been the debate itself, not a cold deterministic result. So I’m a bit torn on it now.

Still, I figured some of you might enjoy playing with it.

I’ve got some spare API credits for the LLM recaps, and I also set up a small Ko-fi tip link just to help cover the API costs if anyone feels like supporting it.

I’m also considering open-sourcing the whole thing soon, so any feedback or suggestions on how to make it more fun (or more debate-friendly) would be really appreciated.

Thank!

reddit.com

u/AISmithStudio — 2 days ago

▲ 0 r/publicdefenders

I built a tool that systematically cross-references case documents to flag potential contradictions and was wondering if public defenders would actually use something like this?

WHAT IT DOES: Reads through discovery documents (motions, depositions, forensic reports, witness statements) and flags where: - Expert A says X, Expert B says Y - Witness statement conflicts with physical evidence - Timeline doesn't add up - Tests weren't performed or results weren't disclosed

EXAMPLE: Tested on one case with ~750 pages of documents (credit: crimetimelines.com for making materials public). Found things like: - Expert reversed conclusion between reports with no new evidence - Lab tests contradicted expert's claims - Timeline inconsistencies in witness statements

Still had to verify everything myself - read source documents, confirm the contradictions actually existed, decide if they mattered. This just surfaced potential issues faster than manually reading everything.

HOW IT WORKS (BYOK): - You provide your own Anthropic API key - Documents stay in your browser (local storage only) - You pay Anthropic directly (~$5-25 per case depending on size) - I don't charge anything or see your data

QUESTION: Is this even viable for public defenders? Or do ethical/confidentiality constraints make it a non-starter?

Not trying to sell anything - genuinely asking if this would be useful before building features for practicing attorneys.

Background: I work in corporate tax, built this as a side project.

u/AISmithStudio — 9 days ago

▲ 0 r/legaltech

Built an AI case analysis tool for lawyers/investigators — would love feedback from anyone who does discovery or case prep

I've been building a local-first web app that lets you drop in a stack of case documents (police reports, witness statements, depositions, medical records, whatever) and get a structured analysis back.

What it actually does:

Finds contradictions between documents ("Witness A says the car was blue, police report says gray")
Flags red flags and behavioral patterns
Identifies evidence gaps — what's missing that should be there
Builds a timeline across all docs
Lets you thumbs-up/down findings so dismissed stuff doesn't keep resurfacing on re-analysis
Has a task tracker so you can turn a finding directly into an action item

Everything runs in your browser with your own Anthropic API key. Nothing is sent to a server...all docs stay local in IndexedDB.

It's not trying to replace legal judgment, just cut down the "read 300 pages and find the inconsistency" grunt work.

Still rough around the edges. Curious if this is actually useful to anyone doing criminal defense, civil lit, or PI work or if I'm solving the wrong problem?

reddit.com

u/AISmithStudio — 16 days ago