Is it (still) a romance?
Hello all!
I've written a novel that is currently in beta reads, with agent queries starting around the end of the summer, and the latter brings up a crucial question: genre classification. I originally conceived of it as a contemporary romance, but there are certain elements that are now part of the story that complicate this question, and my partner and I have been having animated (but friendly) discussions over whether it is still a romance, or if it has crossed into the realm of "literary/upmarket fiction."
Here are the main points of debate:
- FMC morally grey moments: grew up in evangelical "purity culture," as well as hyper-vigilant moral policing by church, parents, extended family. When she is asked to housesit for a new friend in act 1 (who becomes love interest in act 2), she walks into his bedroom, fantasizes about him for a moment before leaving, feels regretful. Later, acting compulsively out of her fear of losing the freedom she has found alone in his house, she undresses in his room, again feels regret. She discovers how she has been manipulated by "purity culture" after these episodes (near the end of act 1), though she delays telling him about her violations of his space until midway through act 3 (they are romantically together at this point), after crossing a significant threshold of self-actualization.
- Is the romance itself is the center of the story, or her "coming-of-age/self"?: he is introduced at the beginning of the story, she is interested in him from the beginning (though she denies it throughout act 1, thinking he is just tied up in her fantasy of freedom), they get together halfway through the book, and the rest of the novel focuses primarily on them trying to get their families to accept them. But significant focus (i.e., whole chapters) is given to her building a life for herself, including escaping the moral repression of her old world, getting past the "temp job phase of life" (not to a "dream job," just something solid), establishing a real, non-romantic friendship with a co-worker at her new job, and negotiating a more functional relationship with her parents. Also, during the Act 1 "self-liberation" sequence, he moves mostly "offstage" for about 6-7 chapters while he is at a work conference (for which which she is housesitting), except for a handful of text exchanges; this is done so that the initiation of her self-liberation arc is unmistakably hers, and in no way interpretable as "inspired by" or "thanks to" him. And to answer the most important question, it does have a HEFN ending, with their front-porch wedding with their new "found community" as the setting of the final two chapters, though their hope of reconciliation with family is partial, with his father rejecting them outright, one of her grandmothers "blessing" the wedding but refusing to attend, the other grandmother rejecting them, but not stopping the main character's favorite cousin (her grandson) from attending.
- Romance tropes, repurposed: this one concerns me the least, since romance authors do it regularly, but still... Examples include her seeing his "warm eyes" when they first meet, which she finds more disconcerting than enticing, because she feels like she cannot "read" them/him; a "secret underwear" scene that is about her desire to feel good about something she knows no one else will ever see, rather than feeling ready to entice her romantic interest; and more generally, her use of classic romance tropes as part of her dissociative tendencies to escape into fantasy to escape reality, especially by continually reminding herself that she is "no one's main character" (i.e., not the love interest in her own story, because she feels unworthy of that kind of love).
Any thoughts you would like to share will be deeply welcomed and appreciated!