Login

r/orgmode

🔥 Hot ▲ 89 r/orgmode+1 crossposts

Join Org mode contributor liaison team and help maintaining Org mode

We are looking for volunteers who are ready to help with initial review of 4 to 8 bugs, patches, or feature requests every month. No deep Elisp skills required; just being kind. "Initial review" can be as simple as marking new emails for our bug tracker by replying with "Confirmed." in email body to bug reports.

More details in the mailing list announcement: https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/87h5p0azug.fsf@localhost/

Detailed instructions: https://orgmode.org/worg/org-maintenance.html#liaison

reddit.com
u/yantar92 — 1 day ago
▲ 13 r/orgmode+1 crossposts

Beginner looking for a tutorial on org-mode for Html and LaTeX

u/_steelbird_ — 4 days ago
▲ 4 r/orgmode+3 crossposts

I built a small structural gate for LLM outputs. It does not check truth.

I am working on a small project called OMNIA.

The idea is simple:

OMNIA does not try to decide whether an answer is true.

It checks whether an output is structurally admissible.

Example:

- incomplete answer

- expression instead of final answer

- wrong output format

- partial answer

- instability under small variations

These are not the same thing as semantic correctness.

A well-formed wrong answer can still pass OMNIA.

That is intentional.

The current boundary is:

structural validity != semantic correctness

So the intended pipeline is:

LLM -> OMNIA -> semantic evaluator -> decision

I tested this through several small validation stages.

The most useful result so far is that V9 catches structural incompleteness and malformed outputs, while keeping the scope explicitly limited.

Repo:

https://github.com/Tuttotorna/OMNIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19739481

This is still early work.

I am looking for criticism on the boundary, not hype.

u/Different-Antelope-5 — 2 days ago