r/USAcorruption

Betting – once largely siloed to sporting events – has now spread to include contracts on news events where insider information could give some traders an advantage.

[removed]

More:

https://blocknow.com/uae-yuan-oil-threat-dollar-swap-lines-treasury-dump/

“EPICALLY CORRUPT”! Rep. Jamie Raskin sounds alarm as Trump DOJ hands $1.25 million in taxpayer money to Michael Flynn — despite his guilty plea.

Donald Trump has found the perfect way to reward his cronies, his co-conspirators, and his personal militia: make American taxpayers foot the bill.

Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, is demanding answers after Trump's Justice Department agreed to pay Michael Flynn — the man who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his secret meetings with the Russian ambassador — $1.25 million in taxpayer money. Not because the government lost. Not because a judge ordered it. But because Trump came back to power, and his DOJ simply decided to hand over the money.

Let's be crystal clear about what happened here. Flynn sued the government for $50 million in 2023, claiming malicious prosecution. The DOJ fought the case. A judge dismissed it. The government won. Case over.

Then Trump returned to the White House. Flynn refiled. And suddenly, the same Justice Department that had just won the case did a complete 180 — and wrote Flynn a $1.25 million check from your tax dollars.

"The Department out of nowhere chose to fork over substantial amounts in taxpayer dollars," Raskin wrote in a blistering letter to acting AG Todd Blanche, "for having the audacity to investigate, prosecute, and convict a Trump ally who had admitted to committing a serious felony by lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian officials."

A man who admitted — under oath — to lying to federal investigators about his secret conversations with Russia just got a windfall of $1.25 million of your tax dollars — for a case the government already won.

And Raskin's letter makes clear this is not a one-off. This is a template. A road map, as he puts it, "for this epically corrupt President to keep paying out his political underlings and private militiamen with taxpayer money."

Consider the full scope of what's being lined up at the taxpayer trough. Trump himself is seeking $230 million from the DOJ over the January 6th and Mar-a-Lago documents cases. He's separately suing the IRS for $10 billion — roughly two-thirds of the agency's entire annual budget. Roughly 400 pardoned January 6th rioters have filed claims seeking between $1 million and $10 million each. Five Proud Boys leaders convicted of seditious conspiracy have filed a $100 million lawsuit. The family of Ashli Babbitt has already received nearly $5 million. Stefan Passantino, Trump's former White House lawyer, is seeking his own settlement.

The insurrectionists, the liars, the coup plotters, and the Russian asset are all lined up and waiting for their checks. They’re all expecting the Justice Department — the one Trump controls — to roll over just like it did for Flynn.

Raskin is also raising a darker legal question: whether the Flynn settlement was even legal at all. Federal law requires that settlements arise from a "genuine adversarial dispute." When a Justice Department that just won a case suddenly reverses course and writes a check the moment its boss's ally refiles, Raskin argues that "the parties may not be genuinely adversarial and that the settlement may be collusive in essence."

In plain English: it may not be a settlement at all. It may just be theft — laundered through the legal system with a government signature on it.

The DOJ did not respond to requests for comment. Neither did Flynn's lawyer. Because what is there to say? The check has already been written — with your money — for a man who lied to the FBI about talking to Russia.

Do you think American taxpayers shouldn't be forced to pay Trump's allies for the prosecution of the crimes they admitted committing?