r/TrueCrimeDiscussion

In 2008 Yaser Said murdered his two daughters for dating
🔥 Hot ▲ 343 r/TrueCrimeDiscussion

In 2008 Yaser Said murdered his two daughters for dating

​

in 2007-2008 Yaser discovered that his daughter Amina Said was dating which upset him alot because he had set up for both Amina and his other daughter Sarah to be married at the age of 18 after graduation

after graduating Amina was accepted to the university of Texas and Yaser told her that her husband will decide for her if she goes which was a 48 year old Egyptian man and when she rejected it he pulled a gun on her threatening to kill her

Yaser told his wife and other daughter to take Amina to a store and buy her final meal and the mother drove them but drove to Kansas to her sister which made Yaser extremely angry and he made numerous calls to all of them threatening death to them and their boyfriends

that same day they arrived the mother drove all girls back to Texas under the lie of putting flowers on a grave but she took them back to Yaser who murdered both of them in his house, Amina was shot 3 times and her sister Sarah was shot 9 times

Yaser evaded arrest for 12 years and his son "Islam" said that they knew the rules and knew this would happen due to the rules of Islam in the household

his wife was never arrested

Yaser was convicted of capital murder in 2020 with life in prison with possibility of parole for the murder of Amina Said (18) and Sarah Said (17)

Islam Said was arrested for 10 years for concealing his father who was on the list of 10 most wanted criminals

Source: Department of Justice (.gov) https://share.google/gF0tmZoOIO4Mh3lbK

Source: Wikipedia https://share.google/nZU04Oy8Lq2IYfDLO

there is also a tv show episode on this incident

u/Bejaminmaston12 — 16 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 125 r/TrueCrimeDiscussion

In 1990, Rosie Alfaro stabbed a nine year old girl to death for drug money. She was sentenced to death for this in 1992.

In 1990, nine year old Autumn Wallace was alone at home. She was making paper dolls when 18 year old Rosie Alfaro knocked on the door. Rosie Alfaro knew the Wallace family very well because she was friends with Autumn's older sister. So, Autumn let her in after Alfaro asked if she could use her restroom. However, Alfaro had different intentions. Alfaro (who was a drug addict and also pregnant at the time) wanted money to purchase drugs. So, she selected a house of a family she knew believing that nobody was there. To eliminate Autumn as a witness, she took a knife from the kitchen, coaxed Autumn into the bathroom, and stabbed her 57 times. Alfaro stole several items and sold them for less than $300 dollars.

Rosie Alfaro was later apprehended. The police found Autumn Wallace's blood on Alfaro's shoes and Alfaro's fingerprints all over the house. Alfaro confessed to the crime. She at first claimed to be high on heroine and cocaine during the murder. But, she later changed her story and said a man forced her to stab Wallace to death. But, she refused to identify the alleged man. Years later, Alfaro said she "had to kill" Autumn because Autumn knew who she was. Rosie Alfaro had lived a very troubled life. She was a drug addict by thirteen, a prostitute by 14, a mother by fifteen and had four children by eighteen.

Rosie Alfaro was put on trial on 1992. The jury found her guilty and deadlocked 10-2 on whether to give her the death penalty. So, there was a mistrial on the sentencing phase. The second jury on the retrial unanimously voted to sentence her to death. Rosie Alfaro was the first woman in Orange County, California to be sentenced to death. She remains on death row to this day awaiting her execution. However, whether there will be an execution date for her remains uncertain due to the moritorium that Gavin Newsom put in place in 2019.

https://murderpedia.org/female.A/a/alfaro-maria.htm

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ca-supreme-court/1299458.html

https://www.ocregister.com/2009/12/11/who-kills-a-9-year-old-girl-for-drugs/

https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/07/15/death-penalty-reinstated-for-woman-who-stabbed-9-year-old-to-death-in-anaheim/

u/Turbulent-Patient219 — 10 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 51 r/TrueCrimeDiscussion

Kampatimar Shankariya, an Indian serial killer who murdered 70 people at just age 25, yet not much is known of him.

Shankariya was born in 1952 in Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. Not much is known about Shankariya's childhood except that he lived with his parents.

In 1977, the Rajasthan, Haryana, and Punjab areas trembled in fear as people kept being found murdered with no apparent clues.

However, most victims have one thing in common: there were signs of striking down with a hammer on the spot below the neck near the ear. Hence, people started to call the unknown murderer “Kanpatimar,” which is a word combined of the Hindi word "Kanpati" (under the ear) and "Marr" (to hit.)

As the mysterious deaths keep occurring in the area every day, some locals even believe the victims were killed by mythical creatures or were killed by spies sent from Pakistan, as in the 70s, when the threat of war loomed between two countries.

Some witnesses stated they spotted a mysterious man walking near train tracks, and some stated a man covered his face with a blanket was roaming around.

One day in 1979, the police managed to catch a man who covered his face with a blanket and hid behind a tree and tried to run away. He introduced himself as Shankariya, and police strongly believed him to be the killer, yet there was no crucial evidence yet, as no murder weapon was found in his house.

However, when Shankariya was detained in police custody for interrogation, he would confess that he was the very killer. When the policeman asked if he killed 60 people, he replied, “Sir, I killed 70, not 60.” Following his confession, Shankariya led the police to the bush he used to hide in and took out a hammer from there, which he used for murders.

Although Shankariya confessed to murdering 70 people, the police were able to confirm only 63 murders were committed by him.

When asked why Shankariya committed such a crime, he simply stated it was for fun and leisure.

Shankariya was hanged to death on May 16, 1979. His last words were, “I have murdered in vain. Nobody should become like me."

Despite Shankariya’s unbelievable numbers of victims, the information regarding him is very rare. I could find only 2 images of him on the internet. I hope we will get to know about his crimes more clearly one day.

Sources:

https://www.aajtak.in/crime/big-crime/story/unknown-facts-about-indian-serial-killer-kampatimar-shankariya-from-rajasthan-382603-2016-09-14

(Hindi)

https://www.abplive.com/gk/shankaria-the-serial-killer-of-rajasthan-who-committed-70-murders-at-the-age-of-25-top-serial-killer-india-2698640

(Hindi)

https://aapkarajasthan.com/jaipur/how-did-kanpatimar-sankariya-become-a-headache-for-the/cid16601053.htm

(Hindi)

https://www.crimeandinvestigation.co.uk/articles/indias-most-prolific-serial-killers

u/ZoelCairo — 14 hours ago
🔥 Hot ▲ 68 r/TrueCrimeDiscussion

Nine policemen sentenced to death in India over Covid custody killings

The crime was that two innocent, poor victims kept their shop open longer than the allowed time during the COVID-19 lockdown.

So, the police took them to the police station and severely beat them. The next day, they died. One of them had rectal bleeding. The cruelty inflicted on them is hard to put into words.

bbc.com
u/Confident-Day-4278 — 24 hours ago

Sorry if this has been posted before, but has anyone else been noticing Dateline, 48 hours, & ABC 20/20 have ALL all been claiming they’re coming out with “new” episodes every week, but each time, it’s an old episode being labeled as *new*?

Some people will say, “Oh there’s new info about the case so that’s why”. But I’m telling you it’s just the exact same episode as before. Or they’ll say, “It’s probably just a glitch on the app you’re streaming on, labeling re-run’s as new.” But this is on ALL my streaming apps. I don’t understand why they keep doing this, I’ve been disappointed for months thinking there’s new episodes, but when I click it’s just an old one I’ve seen already being labeled as new. I know there’s not some shortage/lack of cases for them to pick up on for the show, so does anyone know what’s going on or why this has been happening for some time now?

reddit.com
u/misspooterbutt — 22 hours ago

What do you think happend to Andrew Gosden after he went missing on September 14th 2007?

It's been nearly 19 years since Andrew Gosden went missing and it's one of those cases that has really left me wondering, as why did he travel to London as a child and wasn't noticed by anyone? Here is some of the background to the case

  1. Andrew was 14 years old when he went missing.

  2. He left his home for school on the 14th of September, didn’t walk to school and went to draw out £200 from his bank account which contained £214.

  3. After this he went back home, changed and put his school uniform in the wash.

  4. He then went to Doncaster train station and purchased a 1 way ticket to London, the ticket sales man recalled him refusing a return ticket despite it being 50p cheaper than a single. (There is CCTV footage of Andrew in Doncaster train station)

  5. He then arrived at King’s cross station in London, there is CCTV footage of him arriving, and also witnesses claimed he was glued to his hand held gaming device he had brought with him.

  6. He wasn't dressed for the weather or for a day in London, he just wore a black Slip Knot t-shirt and no coat.

  7. Andrew’s Father states they have family in London, he theorises Andrew may have intended on turning up there to ask for a lift home, explaining why he got a 1 way ticket.

To this day, we still have no idea what could have happened to him and what his intentions were to get a one way ticket? But also, why was he at the train station in the first place? I really want to know what you could have happened to Andrew and do you think he will ever be found?

reddit.com
u/Train-Wreck-70 — 16 hours ago

Andrew Malkinson: 17 years in prison despite DNA evidence — full case breakdown

I recently looked into the Andrew Malkinson case, and I honestly didn’t realise just how serious the failures were until I went through the full timeline.

Malkinson was convicted in 2004 for a rape case in the UK. From the beginning, he maintained his innocence and refused to admit guilt — even though doing so could have improved his chances of early release. That alone already sets his case apart, because many people in similar situations eventually plead guilty just to get out sooner.

What makes this case even more troubling is the role of DNA evidence.

There was DNA recovered from the crime scene, but it didn’t match Malkinson. You would think that would immediately raise serious doubts about the conviction, but that’s not what happened. Instead, the evidence wasn’t fully pursued for years.

From what I’ve read, there were multiple opportunities to revisit and properly test or act on that DNA evidence, but those opportunities weren’t taken. His appeals were rejected, and the case didn’t receive the level of scrutiny you’d expect given the existence of biological evidence pointing away from him.

So he stayed in prison.

For 17 years.

All while maintaining his innocence.

It wasn’t until much later, after advancements in DNA testing and renewed attention on the case, that things began to change. The DNA was eventually linked to another individual — someone who had been on the police database for years.

That detail is what really stuck with me. The idea that the answer may have been sitting there for so long, while someone else remained in prison, is hard to ignore.

Malkinson was finally exonerated after spending nearly two decades behind bars.

Now, the man believed to be responsible for the original crime is currently on trial. So this isn’t just a historical case — it’s still unfolding in real time.

What I find most unsettling about this situation isn’t just that a wrongful conviction happened, but how long it took to correct it, despite the presence of DNA evidence. It raises bigger questions about how evidence is handled, how appeals are assessed, and what safeguards are actually in place to prevent something like this from happening.

Cases like this make you wonder how many others might still be out there — people maintaining their innocence, but without the kind of breakthrough that eventually happened here.

I ended up putting together a full breakdown of the case because I wanted to understand how all of this unfolded step by step — from the original investigation to the appeals process and the eventual exoneration.

Curious to hear what others think about this case, especially with the current trial happening.

reddit.com
u/Compellingadvert — 23 hours ago
Week