r/Savarkar

▲ 179 r/Savarkar+1 crossposts

Opposition to Vande Mataram: Will We Comply or Confront?


Reference: https://www.livemint.com/news/india/asaduddin-owaisi-objects-to-centre-equating-vande-mataram-with-jana-gana-mana-nation-is-not-a-goddess-11778203789994.html

A hundred years ago, they objected to Vande Mataram, and we complied and decided to make concessions in the hope that we could live together in harmony. A few decades later, they asked for a separate nation. Now again, we're at the same crossroads.

Let's leave the Islamists out of the question. The left-wing extremists who hurl slurs at Hindus and call us regressive for something as simple as celebrating our festivals, who want to "reform" our religion and its rules, as evident in the Sabrimala case, are supporting the "rights" of Islamists to deny singing Vande Mataram on the grounds of their religious theology? Sheer hypocrisy!

The only solution, as told by Dr. Ambedkar, is establishing boundaries, not concessions.

> There are the Congress Hindu nationalists whose policy is to tolerate and appease the Muslims by political and other concessions, because they believe that they cannot reach their cherished goal of independence unless the Muslims back their demand…Is the Congress way, the right way? It seems to me that the Congress has failed to realize two things: The first thing which the Congress has failed to realize is that there is a difference between appeasement and settlement, and that the difference is an essential one. Appeasement means buying off the aggressor by conniving at his acts of murder, rape, arson and loot against innocent persons who happen for the moment to be the victims of his displeasure. On the other hand, settlement means laying down the bounds which neither party to it can transgress. Appeasement sets no limits to the demands and aspirations of the aggressor. Settlement does. The second thing the Congress has failed to realize is that the policy of concession has increased Muslim aggressiveness, and what is worse, Muslims interpret these concessions as a sign of defeatism on the part of the Hindus and the absence of the will to resist. This policy of appeasement will involve the Hindus in the same fearful situation in which the Allies found themselves as a result of the policy of appeasement which they adopted towards Hitler

—Dr. B. R. Ambedkar in his book Pakistan or partition of India, p. 261.


u/AhamPranav — 3 days ago

The Conversion Racket in the Andamans


> I was sent to the Andamans in 1911, and I soon found out that some Hindu prisoners had been converted to Islam and assumed Muslim names after their transportation to the Andamans. And when I traced the genesis of this change, I found that the Hindus in that place never found it worth while to think of, and took it as a matter of course. What was there in it, they felt, that one should look into its origin or trace it to its cause?

> There are no appointed persons to bring about conversion in jails, nor is there any organisation behind it. Every Muslim is trained from his very childhood to regard the conversion of a Kaffir to his own faith as his sacred duty. He is told that thereby he will be forgiven all his sins and abide in the heaven of Allah with all its pleasure and ease to be his, from eternity to eternity. This is, in truth, the mainspring of conversion of Hindus to Islam throughout the prison-world of India.

> The political prisoners, of all others, suffer most at their hands, because the bulk of them are Hindus. These officers subject them to the hardest labour, threaten them with the severest punishment and lodge false complaints against them. They thus make their lives a hell for them, and out-and-out tell them to become Mussulmans to escape from these throes. The young, the ignorant and the helpless easily succumb to them.

> The usual way of conversion in the Silver Jail of the Andamans was as follows:

> As soon as the Chalan came in that prison or whenever, later on, a suitable opportunity was found for the purpose, the young and the simple-minded lads out of Hindu prisoners were taken in charge by the head of the Mussulman warders and jamadars, the notorious Mirza Khan, and at once put on hard labour.

> The Mussalman warder or petty officer, in their immediate charge, lost no time in browbeating and thrashing them on the one hand, and in offering them baits on the other in order to force them into Islam. He would give them, with that end in view, tobacco to chew and sweetmeats to eat. On such an occasion, he treated these gullible lads with extreme kindness. When these boys were beaten and worked to the point of crying, he would openly advise them to become Muslims and all their troubles would be over.

> Gradually these new victims were caught in his net, and at last the ceremony of conversion came to be completed, by making them openly abandon their seats for meal among the Hindu prisoners and go into the rank of Muslim prisoners. They were then served Mohomedan food so that there was no more chance left open for them to rejoin their Hindu friends.

> The Hindu and the Mohomedan kitchens were kept separate in this jail and the cooks were Hindus or Mohomedans according to the kitchen they looked after. Once the Hindu lads were discovered dining with the Mohomedans, they were sure to be banned by the Hindus. This was, therefore, an effective mode and final stroke of absorbing them in the Islamic faith.

> They were at once baptised with Muslim names. If any one called them by their former names, Mirza Khan would growl at them, and his myrmidons would threaten them with severe punishment. “He is now a Mussulman,” they would say, “and you must call him by his new name, beware.”

> This was all the ceremony through which these poor lads were made to pass to be the followers of the new faith. No circumcision, no recital of the Koran, no Nimaz, was necessary in their case. Tobacco was their circumcision, hard labour their Koran, and dining with Muslims was their Nimaz.

> As I began noticing this, I felt an urge within me to put an end to it. Every week or fortnight I had seen one Hindu prisoner at dinner sitting in the rank of his Mohomedan fellows.

> It was impossible for me to witness the scene. But I was only a prisoner here; what could I do to save them?

In the next part, we will read how orthodox Hindus in Andamans opposed Savarkar's idea of reconverting these people back to Hinduism as well as Savarkar's rational rebuttal to them.


Reference: My Transportation For Life

Read the whole book from here: https://savarkar.org/en/pdfs/My-Transportation-for-Life-Veer-Savarkar.pdf


reddit.com
u/AhamPranav — 1 day ago

No Misogyny intended .

Lets start a petition to rename Indira Point to Veer Savarkar Point .

u/Witty_Mouse1403 — 5 days ago
▲ 31 r/Savarkar+1 crossposts

Defiance of Shivaji Maharaj in the face of absolute power and authority

https://preview.redd.it/m1rztehgwn0h1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=da4064a152b5e96b9a88e1db54a0b74da46a622a

On this day, 12th of May 1666, 360 years ago, Shivaji famously defied Badshah Aurangzeb in his court at Agra. His defiance in the face of tyranny, reignited the flame of resistance in the heart of a dying race of Hindus to continue on their fight against the bigotry and intolerance perpetrated against a peace loving people by foreign occupiers.

reddit.com
u/Embarrassed_Toe2416 — 2 days ago
▲ 59 r/Savarkar+1 crossposts

CPI Adhikari's Thesis "Pakistan and National Unity" that legitimize and defended Two-Nation Theory and asked for dismembering the India, as it would “lead to still greater and more glorious unity of India, the like of which India has not seen in her history.”

The communists implied independence as the deliverance of the working classes from bourgeois exploitation which could be attained by overthrowing of the capitalist order through a socialist revolution and substituting it with the ‘dictatorship of the proletariat’.

The Congress and the communists were always at ideological loggerheads with each other. The communists perceived the Gandhian movement as a bourgeois struggle and transfer of power as replacement of colonialism with that of neo-colonialism, where imperialist interests would be served better.

When the clamour for Pakistan by the Muslim League, on the basis of Jinnah’s two-nation theory was warming up, and Congress leaders were in jail following the uprising of August 1942, the CPI released a ‘thesis’, drafted by Gangadhar Adhikari. 

The substance of the thesis was that there was no such nation as India, that India was really a conglomeration of as many as eighteen different ‘nationalities’ and that each one of these nationalities had the right to secede from the conglomeration. The communist understanding was that Muslims would be oppressed by the Hindus in united India and that the League had become ‘progressive’.

Supporting Jinnah’s demand for Pakistan, the communists argued that secession, far from dismembering the country, would “lead to still greater and more glorious unity of India, the like of which India has not seen in her history.”

source:
https://www.scribd.com/document/638683092/G-Adhikari-thesis-1942

https://www.scribd.com/document/638683088/G-Adhikari-Communist-thesis-for-partition-1942

https://www.marxists.org/subject/india/cpi/pakistan-national-unity/nat-unity-now.pdf

---

My own opinion after reading all this: basically, CPI is saying that india shouldn't get freedom unless Muslim League's demand are fulfilled because in that case "Rights" of indian muslim will be taken away.

There are saying that formation of ML is not formed because Ethnology-religious Ideologies i.e. "Reactionary" but to protect the interest of indian muslims from imperialist Hindu Congress and Mahashabha.

u/FloralBegonia — 5 days ago

Savarkar and the Legend of Marseilles Escape


In July 1910, while being transported by the British aboard the S.S. Morea, Savarkar made one of the most dramatic escape attempts in the history of the Indian revolutionary movement. As the ship was docked at Marseilles in France, he slipped out through the porthole of the ship’s lavatory, jumped into the sea, and swam to the French shore in an attempt to escape British custody.

Although he was quickly recaptured, news of the incident spread widely across India and among Indian revolutionaries abroad. The daring nature of the escape transformed Savarkar into a legendary figure in popular imagination. Stories and exaggerations began circulating about him, with many people attributing almost superhuman qualities to the man who had leapt into the sea at Marseilles.

Years later, in My Transportation for Life, Savarkar himself reflected on how ordinary people reacted when they finally met him in prison:

> [while Savarkar was being held at the Alipore Jail in Calcutta following his transfer from the Andamans in 1921, he was taking to a guard] As I talked to him, I knew that he was not unfamiliar with my name. He could not believe his eyes when I told him that I was that Savarkar of whom he had heard. How could a big man be contained in the ordinary cell of a prison! His idea of a big man was that he must be a man of abnormal size. Ordinary people have always had similar notions of greatness and, when they see that the great man before them does not come up to their notion of him, they are often shocked and disillusioned. So the Chinaman put me the question, “Does a gun-shot pierce your body?” I answered, “No doubt, it will.” And a deep disappointment was visible on his face.

> Another sepoy asked me, “How many days and nights were you swimming in the sea?” Of course, he meant at Marseilles. I answered, “What of days and nights? I swam only for ten minutes before I reached the shore across.” This reply gave a rude shock to his admiration for me, and to the miraculous powers he attributed to me. If I had bragged and lied to him, he would not have received any shock, but the barest truth that I told him seemed to put him out. My habit of reporting correctly what happened at Marseilles had lost me many friendships in life and their reverence for me.

Reference: My Transportation for Life, page 363.

What stands out in this passage is Savarkar’s insistence on telling the truth exactly as it happened. He could easily have encouraged the myths and exaggerations surrounding the Marseilles escape, but instead he deliberately corrected them, even when it reduced the awe people felt toward him.

Rather than presenting himself as an invincible hero, Savarkar chose honesty over self-glorification. In doing so, he offered a rare reflection on how political legends are created, and how truth is often less satisfying to people than myth.


Reference: My Transportation For Life

Read the whole book from here: https://savarkar.org/en/pdfs/My-Transportation-for-Life-Veer-Savarkar.pdf


u/AhamPranav — 3 days ago

Savarkar’s “O! Martyrs!” Pamphlet


The “O! Martyrs!” pamphlet was a powerful four-page leaflet written and distributed by Swatantrya Veer Savarkar in May 1908. It honored the heroes of the 1857 uprising and also called for a new revolutionary movement against British rule.

Savarkar wrote the pamphlet to mark the anniversary of the Meerut uprising on May 10, 1857. He argued that the event was not just a “mutiny,” as the British described it, but India’s “First War of Independence.”

The pamphlet was also a response to the British Golden Jubilee celebrations of 1857 held in 1907 and 1908. British newspapers had described the Indian rebels as criminals and murderers, but Savarkar praised them as martyrs who sacrificed themselves for their country, religion, and freedom.

A central idea of the text was that the fight for independence was still continuing. It famously stated: “The war begun on the 10th of May 1857 is not over on the 10th of May 1908, nor can it ever cease till a 10th of May to come sees the destiny accomplished.”

Thousands of copies of the pamphlet were circulated in both England and India. Indian students in London wore badges saying “Honours to the martyrs of 1857” along with the pamphlet’s message, which led to clashes with British authorities and professors.

The pamphlet also emphasized Hindu-Muslim unity during the 1857 revolt. Savarkar described the uprising as a movement in which both communities united under the idea of the Motherland.

Because the pamphlet used the memory of the 1857 revolt to encourage resistance against British rule, the British government considered it seditious. In 1910, it was later used as evidence against Savarkar in the case accusing him of conspiring to wage war against the British Crown.

Here is the full text of the pamphlet, made available thanks to historian Vikram Sampath, who shared it on page 514 of his book, Savarkar: Echoes from a Forgotten Past.

You can download the PDF of the book for free here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Uuq65oIXW_AIqiX4S_Xs8lqL1c0cw9f-


> The battle of freedom once begun And handed down from sire to son Though often lost, is ever won!!

Today is the 10th of May! It was on this day that, in the ever-memorable year of 1857, the first campaign of the War of Independence was opened by you, O Martyrs, on the battlefields of India. The Motherland, awakened to the sense of her degrading slavery, unsheathed her sword, burst forth the shackles, and struck the first blow for her liberty and for her honour.

It was on this day that the war cry Maro Firungee Ko was raised by the throats of thousands. It was on this day that the sepoys of Meerut, having risen in a terrible uprising, marched down to Delhi, saw the waters of the Jumna glittering in the sunshine, caught one of those historical moments which close a past epoch to introduce a new one, and found, in a moment, a leader, a flag, and a cause, and converted the mutiny into a national and a religious war.

All honour be to you, O Martyrs; for it was for the preservation of the honour of the race that you performed the fiery ordeal of a revolution, when the religions of the land were threatened with a forcible and sinister conversion; when the hypocrite threw off his friendly garb and stood up in the naked heinousness of a perfidious foe—breaking treaties, smashing crowns, forging chains, and mocking all the while our Merciful Mother for the very honesty with which she believed the pretensions of the white liar.

Then you, O Martyrs of 1857, awoke the Mother, inspired the Mother, and for the honour of the Mother rushed to the battlefield, terrible and tremendous, with the war cry Maro Firungee Ko on your lips, and with the sacred mantra “God and Hindustan” on your banner!

Well did you in rising! For otherwise, although your blood might have been spared, yet the stigma of servility would have been the deeper; one more link would have been added to the cursed chain of demoralizing patience, and the world would have again contemptuously pointed to our nation, saying: “She deserves slavery; she is happy in slavery! For even in 1857, she did not raise even a finger to protect her interests and her honour!”

This day, therefore, we dedicate, O Martyrs, to your inspiring memory!

It was on this day that you raised a new flag to be upheld; you uttered a mission to be fulfilled; you saw a vision to be realized; you proclaimed a nation to be born!

We take up your cry, we revere your flag, we are determined to continue that fiery mission of “Away with the foreigner!”, which you uttered amidst the prophetic thunderings of the Revolutionary War—revolutionary, yes, it was a revolutionary war. For the War of 1857 shall not cease till the revolution arrives, striking slavery into dust, elevating liberty to the throne.

Whenever a people rises for its freedom, whenever that seed of liberty gets germinated in the blood of its martyrs, and whenever there remains at least one true son to avenge that blood of his fathers, there never can be an end to such a war as this. No, a Revolutionary War knows no truce save liberty or death!

We, inspired by your memory, determine to continue the struggle you began in 1857. We refuse to acknowledge the armistice as a truce; we look upon the battles you fought as the battles of the first campaign—the defeat of which cannot be the defeat of the war.

What? Shall the world say that India has accepted the defeat as a final one? That the blood of 1857 was shed in vain? That the sons of Ind betray their fathers’ vows? No, by Hindustan, no!

The historical continuity of the Indian nation is not cut off. The war that began on the 10th of May of 1857 is not over on the 10th of May of 1908, nor shall it ever cease till a 10th of May to come sees the destiny accomplished, sees the beautiful Ind crowned either with the lustre of victory or with the halo of martyrdom.

But, O glorious Martyrs, in this pious struggle of your sons, help! O help us by your inspiring presence!

Torn in innumerable petty selves, we cannot realize the grand unity of the Mother. Whisper, then, unto us by what magic you caught the secret of Union. How the Firungee Rule was shattered to pieces and the Swadeshi thrones were set up by the common consent of Hindus and Mahomedans. How, in the higher love of the Mother, united the differences of castes and creeds; how the venerated and venerable Bahadur Shah prohibited the killing of cows throughout India; how Shrimant Nana Saheb, after the first salute of thundering cannon to the Emperor of Delhi, reserved for himself the second one!

How you staggered the whole world by uniting under the banner of the Mother and forced your enemies to say:

> “Among the many lessons the Indian Mutiny conveys to the historian and administrator, none is of greater importance than the warning that it is possible to have a revolution in which Brahmins and Shudras, Mahomedan and Hindu, were united against us, and that it is not safe to suppose that the peace and stability of our dominion in any great measure depends on the continent being inhabited by different races with different religious systems, for they mutually understand each other and respect and take a part in each other’s modes and ways and doings.”

Whisper unto us the nobility of such an alliance of Religion with Patriotism—the true religion which ever is on the side of patriotism, the true patriotism which secures the freedom of religion!

And give us the marvelous energy, daring, and secrecy with which you organized the mighty volcano; show us the volcanic magma that underlay the green thin crust on which the foe was to be kept lulled into a false security; tell us how the chapatti—that fiery cross of India—flew from village to village and from valley to valley, setting the whole intellect of the nation on fire by the very vagueness of its message; and then let us hear the roaring thunder with which the volcano at last burst forth with an all-shattering force, rushing, smashing, burning, and consuming into one continuous fiery flow of red-hot lava flood!

Within a month, regiment after regiment, prince after prince, city after city, sepoys, police, zemindars, pundits, moulvis—the multiple-headed Revolution sounded its tocsin, and temples and mosques resounded with the cry “Maro Firungee Ko!” Away with the foreigners!

Meerut rose, Delhi rose, rose Benares, Agra, Patna, Lucknow, Allahabad, Jadagerpoor, Jhansi, Banda, Indore—from Peshawar to Calcutta and from the Narbada to the Himalayas, the volcano burst forth into a sudden, simultaneous, and all-consuming conflagration!!

And then, O Martyrs, tell us the little as well as the great defects which you found out in our people in that great experiment of yours. But above all, point out that most ruinous—nay, the only material drawback in the body of the nation—which rendered all your efforts futile: the mean selfish blindness which refuses to see its way to join the Nation’s cause.

Say that the only cause of the defeat of Hindustan was Hindustan herself; that, shaking away the slumber of centuries, the Mother rose to hit the foe, but while her right hand was striking the Firungee dead, her left hand struck—alas!—not the enemy but her own forehead! So she staggered and fell back into an inevitable swoon of 50 years!

50 years are past, but O restless spirits of 1857, we promise you with our heart’s blood that your Diamond Jubilee shall not pass without seeing your wishes fulfilled!!

We have heard your voice and we gather courage from it. With limited means you sustained a war, not against tyranny alone but against tyranny and treachery together. The Duab and Ayodhya, making a united stand, staged a war not only against the whole of the British power but against the rest of India too; and yet you fought for three years, and yet you had well-nigh snatched away the crown of Hindustan and smashed the hollow existence of the alien rule.

What an encouragement this! What the Duab and Ayodhya could do in a month, the simultaneous, sudden, and determined rising of the whole of Hindustan can do in a day! This hope illumines our heart and assures us of success. And so we avow that your Diamond Jubilee, the year 1917, shall not pass without seeing the resurging Ind making a triumphant entry into the world!

For the bones of Bahadur Shah are crying vengeance from their grave! For the blood of dauntless Laxmi is boiling with indignation! For the shahid Peer Ali of Patna, when he was going to the gallows for having refused to divulge the secrets of the conspiracy, whispered defiance to the Firungee and said in prophetic words:

> “You may hang me today, you may hang such as me every day, but thousands will still rise in my place—your object will never be gained.”

Indians, these words must be fulfilled! Your blood, O Martyrs, shall be avenged!!!

Bande Mataram!


u/AhamPranav — 4 days ago