r/Nolan

Christopher Nolan is being disingenuous with his defence of Agamemnon's armor.
▲ 0 r/Nolan

Christopher Nolan is being disingenuous with his defence of Agamemnon's armor.

He seriously only discussed the material being based on blackened bronze daggers.

That explains the colour only Nolan! Not the freaking Batman/Marvel scifi armor shape, design, everything else!!!

At least just admit that you fcked it up with the costume design in this movie.

Most likely because you didn't want to make it race specific, ie. GREEK!!!

Respect the region, culture and source material!!!

Cast people that look like ancient Greeks!!!

The armor doesn't look anything like armor from Homer's time. You fired your historical consultant remember?

How about you tell people that in your interviews and be honest about it!!!

Dammmmmm youuuuu Nolannnnnnn!!!!!!

You had the budget to make this incredible! But instead you've made the cringiest modern, broad, woke interpretation ever!!!!

How about you sit down with Mel Gibson and let him teach you how to make a historical/historical fantasy movie.

Uncle Mel will show you how it's done.

variety.com
u/BrandonMarshall2021 — 1 day ago
▲ 0 r/Nolan+1 crossposts

Everyone else is so focussed on supporting or not supporting black actors playing characters in the Odyssey that you wouldn't expect to be black, but the more important issue is...

Where are all the East Asian actors in this production?

You're all so concerned with black and white that you forgot yellow exists too.

What is it with affirmative action being so racially biased towards black people when they're overrepresented for their population demographic in both the US and the UK.

Whereas the East Asian demographic are extremely under-represented in film and tv in the US and UK.

You need to spread the word that race isn't black and white! It's yellow too!

reddit.com
u/BrandonMarshall2021 — 3 days ago
▲ 12 r/Nolan+1 crossposts

Romance of the three kingdoms, directed by Christopher Nolan.

u/courterough — 1 day ago
▲ 0 r/Nolan

Guys I finally realised what's bugging me so much about the casting...

It's the dishonesty.

Just come out and say it's affirmative action, black actor's union/guild pressure on film studios, and or reparations that is behind the casting of Lupita and Zendaya in The Odyssey.

Just admit it.

Stop coming up with such disingenuous reasons.

Because if it was about diversity then East Asians would have prominent speaking roles too.

But they don't.

So just admit this is all just about black affirmative action/reparations.

Coming clean is better.

reddit.com
u/BrandonMarshall2021 — 1 day ago
▲ 0 r/Nolan

We’ve all seen the trailer. 121 million views in a day. Matt Damon, Zendaya, 70mm IMAX—it looks like a technical miracle. But while everyone is hyped for the spectacle, I went back and ran the projector on the 1997 Armand Assante miniseries.

Nolan is promising "tactile realism," but there’s a weight to the 1997 version that CGI can't touch. The way Assante reaches for his dead mother in the Underworld, or how Jim Henson’s Creature Shop handled the Cyclops—it felt heavy.

I put together a breakdown of why the 1997 version is actually the "blueprint" Nolan has to beat if he wants this to be more than just an action movie. If you think Matt Damon is a "safe" choice, you might want to see what Assante did with the role first.

reddit.com
u/Connect-Plant-7744 — 7 days ago
▲ 1 r/Nolan+1 crossposts

Huge Christopher Nolan fan here, but I’ve never read (or really learned) the story of The Odyssey.

I’m debating whether I should:
- go into Nolan’s movie completely blind, or
- learn the basic story beforehand to better appreciate the adaptation.

For those familiar with both Nolan and Homer’s story, do you think knowing the plot/themes ahead of time will improve the experience, or reduce some of the wonder/discovery?

Also, if you do recommend learning the story first, what’s the best spoiler-light summary/video/article to use? The “EPIC: The Musical” has been highly recommended to me, but I’m worried it may go too in-depth before the film.

Of note, I’ve got a pretty low spoiler threshold - I don’t even like to watch trailers of things I know I’m going to see so I don’t get potentially spoiled.

reddit.com
u/xurymc — 9 days ago
▲ 11 r/Nolan+1 crossposts

TENET's scene structure is the SATOR SQUARE

Hi all, I recently did a video essay on my interpretation of TENET. My argument is that the whole movie is broken up into segments of the SATOR square, which is why it can appear clunky as a movie. I have copied the break down of the timing below.

If you want to watch the essay it is up now where I explain it and the other interpretations. https://youtu.be/tHSiPyv-8VE

BREAKDOWN OF TIMING:

In the first SATOR SQUARE (Andrei's Square) we have to continually go back to a TENET phase between each new phase. This decreases in the second SATOR square (The Protagonist's square).

ROTAS I (0:24–8:48)

* Opera house sequence (circular structure, “wheel”)
* Train track torture scene
* Establishes the loop, pressure, and initiation and resets.

TENET I (8:55–18:00)

* The name “Tenet” is introduced
* The handshake
* Meeting the scientist and first exposure to inverted objects

OPERA I (18:00–24:00)

* Contact with Priya Singh
* Meeting Neil
* Movement into deeper access and trust networks

TENET II (24:00–27:00)

* Meeting Sir Michael Crosby
* The Goya forgery is introduced
* First mention of Stalsk-12 and the 14th

AREPO I (27:00–36:00)

AREPO II (36:00–45:00)

* Airport / Freeport heist setup and execution
* Gaining Katherine’s trust
* Turnstiles introduced (implicitly)
* “Arepo” as partial anagram of Freeport

TENET III (45:00–53:00)

* First inverted fight (Freeport sequence)
* Turnstiles fully revealed
* Priya expands on Tenet’s function

SATOR I (53:00–63:00)

SATOR II (64:00–71:00)

* Andrei Sator fully emerges
* Katherine attempts to kill Sator, mirrored by his control over her
* Plutonium-241 deal is introduced


The second SATOR Square - which is The Protagonist's/TENETs square.

ROTAS II (72:00–82:00)

* Highway sequence (the only explicit “wheel” imagery in the second half apart from Neil driving the car in the pincer movement)
* Forward and inverted timelines collide

OPERA II (~82:00–99:00)

* Inverted Protagonist returns
* Reveals true location of the “Plutonium” artifact
* Reinforces: “What’s happened, happened”

TENET V (99:00–117:00)

* Coordination with Priya
* Full scope of Tenet's capabilities and turnstiles are revealed

AREPO III (117:00–135:00)

* Final confrontation between Katherine and Sator
* Temporal pincer movement in action
* Freeport logic resolves at scale

SATOR III (139:00–End)

* Final realization: the Protagonist is the origin
* The protagonist becomes the architect of Tenet
* The loop closes

u/indigonova3683 — 3 days ago