r/NeoFalsafa

▲ 8 r/NeoFalsafa+1 crossposts

Ibn Sina's The Floating Man

Descartes, the philosopher of skepticism decided one day to doubt everything, he decided to discard all beliefs, including reliability of his own senses. But he realized he couldn't doubt his own senses because he couldn't be able to exist if he can think, and concluded with "_cogito ergo sum_" which translates to "I think, therefore I am" which means that I think, so I exist.

Later critical philosophers like Friedrich Nietzsche and Georg Lichtenberg argued that Descartes sneaked a massive assumption by using "I", they felt "thinking is occurring" or, "it is thinking" was more accurate;

• Critics believe, that by using "I", Descartes already assumed what he was trying to prove, saying that while there is a thought, there isn't a unified existing self behind this.

• According to Nietzsche, "I" is a grammartical illusion, he believed that this is a result of how language is structured: every action having a "doer"

But years ago, Ibn Sina already solved this problem by his thought experiment known as "The Floating Man".

In the experiment, a man is created instantaneously (or suspended) in midair, fully developed and formed perfectly, without any memories, no sensory experiences, no physical senses, not even from their own body. His vision is veiled and his limbs are too far to touch each other. Would this person know he exists? yes he would.

reddit.com
u/Imamsheikhspeare — 3 days ago
▲ 41 r/NeoFalsafa+2 crossposts

Academic Books to read if you are intrested in life, theology and philosophy of Al-Ghazali

u/Rashiq_shahzzad — 5 days ago
▲ 34 r/NeoFalsafa+1 crossposts

Fake History :- The Myth of Philosophical Incompetence of Al-Ghazali Against Avicenna

Recently on Twitter, I saw a guy spreading a guy saying that Al-Ghazali didn't understand Ibn Sina's philosophy or philosophy in general and there is a consensus among the so-called Islamic philosophy tradition that Ghazali's understanding of philosophy was incompetent. So I emailed Peter Adamson to know, is this true that is Al-Ghazali incompetent? Did he misunderstand the philosophy tradition? And as you can see in the response, Peter Adamson said the quite opposite. Al-Ghazali is a competent person in philosophy, and he fully understood Avicenian metaphysics. So I think this myth needs to die out that Al-Ghazali misunderstood Ibn Sina, and I think also there are certain people, even in academia, that still push this myth. I'm not accusing anyone of spreading false information in academia, For example, Dr. Khalil retweeted his post, and retweeting a post is not the endorsement of a particular view, but without context, it can easily spread misinformation among the common people.

u/Rashiq_shahzzad — 10 days ago
▲ 16 r/NeoFalsafa+1 crossposts

Dr. Ramon Harvey argues that the Qur’anic framework for a just society views peace as the normative state, with war permitted only as a last resort to ensure security and repel oppression.

u/Rashiq_shahzzad — 8 days ago

In his work Bud al-'Arif Ibn Sab'in virulently criticized Averroes and considered him a fanatic Aristotelian who always sought to validate Aristotle's ideas even when they were absurd.

u/Rashiq_shahzzad — 8 days ago