Flokkk cameras at the entrance of tractor supply/Bank of America off 172nd that I noticed on my walk to Safeway this morning. If I didn't have my hands full and they weren't 15 feet up, they'd have been torn the fuck down. FUCK ICE and FUCK Flokkk.

Edit to add: I walk this route pretty regularly, I'd say at least once a week, and these are BRAND new, so that's why I took a picture and documented them.

Stay safe out there. CHINGA LA MIGRA

Apps like Citizen and others are revealing something that too many families in this district do not realize. A significant number of registered sex offenders live throughout our communities many of them in close proximity to schools, parks, and places where children gather every day.

Parents deserve straightforward access to accurate information. They deserve public safety policies that genuinely reduce risk not policies designed around the comfort of offenders or the avoidance of difficult conversations. This page is about both. What the data shows, what Washington's law currently allows, how we compare to other states, and what needs to change.

The Problem: Washington Has No Statewide Residency Restrictions

Many states restrict high risk sex offenders from residing within a defined distance of schools, parks, daycare centers, playgrounds, bus stops, and other child-focused facilities. These buffer zones typically range from 500 to 2,500 feet depending on the state and the risk level of the offender.

Washington State largely lacks such statewide residency restrictions. While Washington does maintain a sex offender registry and requires offenders to register their address with law enforcement, state law does not prohibit high risk offenders from living near schools or other locations where children regularly gather. Some individual cities and counties have enacted local restrictions, but there is no uniform statewide standard meaning the level of protection a child receives depends entirely on which city or county they happen to live in.

In some neighborhoods across this district and across the state, this gap has resulted in Level 2 and Level 3 sex offenders  those assessed as posing a moderate to high risk of reoffending  living within blocks of elementary schools, middle schools, and public parks.

Even a single high risk offender living near a school is one too many. The question is not whether this is convenient to fix. The question is whether we are willing to protect children or not.

How Washington Compares to Other States

Washington is an outlier. The majority of U.S. states have enacted some form of residency restriction for sex offenders. Here is how several states approach this:

Florida

Prohibits certain sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school, daycare center, park, playground, or bus stop. Some counties extend this to 2,500 feet.

California

Restricts certain sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of a school or park where children regularly gather. Jessica's Law, passed by voters in 2006, established this standard for high risk offenders.

Texas

Prohibits certain sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school, daycare, or playground, and within 500 feet of a location where children commonly gather.

Georgia

Maintains a 1,000 foot buffer zone from schools, childcare facilities, churches, and other locations where children gather. Violations are a felony offense.

Washington State

No statewide residency restriction. Individual cities and counties may adopt local rules, but there is no uniform standard protecting children across the state. High risk offenders can legally reside near schools and parks.

This is not a red state versus blue state issue. States across the political spectrum Florida, California, Texas, Georgia  have concluded that children deserve this protection. Washington has not followed their lead. That needs to change.

Washington's Three Tier Classification System

Washington uses a three tier risk classification system for registered sex offenders:

• Level 1 (Low Risk): Assessed as posing a low risk of reoffense. Community notification is limited.
• Level 2 (Moderate Risk): Assessed as posing a moderate risk of reoffense. Law enforcement may notify schools and neighborhood groups.
• Level 3 (High Risk): Assessed as posing a high risk of reoffense and a threat to public safety. Active community notification is required, including flyers and public postings.

The problem is clear. Washington classifies offenders by risk level but does not restrict where Level 2 and Level 3 offenders can live. We know who poses the greatest threat to children. We simply do not stop them from living next to a school. That is a policy failure, not an oversight.

Federal Law: What Congress Has Already Done  and What More Is Needed

Congress has taken meaningful steps on sex offender policy, but significant gaps remain.

The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 established the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA), creating a national framework for sex offender registration and requiring states to maintain registries. SORNA also created the National Sex Offender Public Website (NSOPW), which allows the public to search registries across all 50 states.

However, SORNA does not establish federal residency restrictions. It leaves that decision entirely to states  and states like Washington have chosen not to act. Federal law also does not currently require states to adopt residency buffers as a condition of receiving federal funding, which means there is no financial incentive for reluctant states to reform their laws.

That is one area where Congress can and should do more.

Kincaid's Position and Policy Priorities

Protecting women and children from sex offenders is not a talking point for this campaign. It is a genuine priority  one that connects directly to the broader Women's Safety and Fairness Agenda that defines this campaign's approach to public safety.

Sex offender residency reform is primarily a state policy issue. Washington's legislature has the authority to act and has not done so with the urgency this issue demands. As a member of Congress, I cannot directly mandate state law  but I can use the tools available at the federal level to push for change and raise the cost of inaction.

If elected to Congress, I will pursue the following:

1. Federal Funding Incentives for State Residency Restrictions

Support legislation that ties federal public safety grant funding to the adoption of minimum residency restriction standards for Level 2 and Level 3 sex offenders particularly restrictions near schools, daycare centers, parks, and playgrounds. States that fail to act should not continue receiving full federal public safety funding without accountability.

2. Strengthening SORNA Compliance and Enforcement

Push for stronger enforcement of existing SORNA requirements and close loopholes that allow high risk offenders to move between jurisdictions without timely notification to local law enforcement. Currently, offenders who move across state lines can fall through the cracks between registry systems.

3. National Attention on Washington State's Failure to Act

Use the platform of a congressional seat to bring direct public and legislative pressure on Washington State to adopt statewide residency restrictions. Elected officials who have the power to protect children and choose not to use it should be held publicly accountable for that choice.

4. Improved Public Transparency and Access to Registry Information

Support improvements to the National Sex Offender Public Website to make registry information more accessible, more accurate, and easier for parents to use including better integration with local mapping tools so families can understand the real situation in their neighborhoods.

5. Treatment and Supervision Resources to Reduce Recidivism

Support evidence based treatment programs and GPS monitoring for high risk offenders on supervised release. Residency restrictions alone are not sufficient  they must be paired with meaningful supervision and treatment to reduce the likelihood of reoffense. Protecting children requires both keeping dangerous offenders away from them and addressing the conditions that drive recidivism.

What Parents in WA-01 Can Do Right Now

While we work to change the law, parents in Washington's 1st District can take these steps today:

• Search the National Sex Offender Public Website (NSOPW) to check your neighborhood.
• Search the Washington State Patrol Sex Offender Registry for detailed local information and Level 3 offender notifications in your area.
• Contact your state legislators  not your congressional representative and demand that Washington adopt statewide residency restrictions for Level 2 and Level 3 offenders near schools, parks, and childcare facilities.
• Talk to your children's school administration about what notification protocols are in place when a registered sex offender moves into the area.

The Bottom Line

Washington State knows which sex offenders pose the greatest risk to children. It classifies them. It notifies communities about them. And then it allows them to live wherever they choose including next door to a school.

That is not a policy. That is a failure dressed up in bureaucratic language.

Protecting children from high risk sex offenders is not a politically complicated idea. It is not an ideological question. It is a basic obligation of government  one that Washington State has not met, and one that far too few elected officials are willing to say plainly.

Protecting women and children will always be a top priority of this campaign. If the people of Washington's 1st District send me to Congress, I will use every tool available to do so.

Missing person last seen in Arlington, WA area as of May 7, 2026.

https://www.change.org/p/require-universal-changing-tables-in-everett-wa

Thank you to these individuals! Universal Healthcare is a winning issue!

1. Kevin Moynihan, LD 19 (also signed Patients over Profits)
2. Annie Fitzgerald, LD 38
3. Ashley Fedan, LD 11 
4. Kenneth King, Pierce County Council
5. Angela Taylor, LD 2 (also signed Patients over Profits)
6. Kelabe Tewolde, LD 37
7. Jessica Forsythe, LD 48 (also signed Patients over Profits)
8. Brett Hennrich, CD 03
9. Danica Noble, LD 32
10. Ron Davis, LD 46 (Note: he is challenging WW endorser Gerry Pollet)
11. Kristin Lillegard, LD 23 (also signed Patients over Profits)
12. Jaelynn Scott, LD 37
13. Kim Harless, LD 49
14. Rebecca Saldana, King County Council
15. John Duresky, CD 04

Patients over Profits is a campaign from National Nurses United where candidates say they will not take more than $200 from healthcare/insurance companies.

Also, shouting out:

Aaron Croft
LD-6 (spokane area) mentions WHT on website and shares our quarter sheets at his tables!

Tomas Scheel, CD 2 (Signed Patients over Profits)

More keep coming in! I know of a few endorsements and PoP pledges that have been promised! Encourage your reps and candidates to endorse Whole Washington at https://wholewashington.org/endorse

Im passing on info about a protest planned in Snohomish County. No Hate, Snohomish County Indivisible, and other community members will be there.

Copy of protest details: This Saturday, May 16th, the Snohomish County Republicans are holding a fundraising dinner with Brian Heywood, Brandi Kruse, Katie Faust, and Jim Walsh focusing on a new target for next year beyond – ending marriage equality across the United States. No Hate in WA State wants you to join us to send a clear message that hate has no place here at home, or across the country.

Join us this Saturday, May 16th from 4:00pm to 5:30pm at the entrance of Thomas Family Farm.

Edit: Parking will be tough. If you can get a ride for pick up and drop off, that would be wise.

Link to protest invite: https://secure.ngpvan.com/JVM7B0Q9UUirn\_oxjHMZ5Q2