Thinking about if I should get an Amiga or a Commodore 64 ultimate.
One of my hobbies involves fixing MS-DOS and Windows systems from the late 80s to the early 2000s. I wanted to branch out my interests into either 16-bit systems or 8-bit systems, and am a bit stumped at which to get:
I like the Amiga because it seems to be a very capable multimedia computer, but at the same time there's no indication of Commodore releasing a new FPGA Amiga and many remaining ones left are too expensive. Additionally, I have enough DOS machines which have some fantastic games, what am I getting here which is significantly better? I also feel like the workflow is weird, I have used an Amiga Emulator but the entire concept of frequent disk swapping was very tedious, especially when I'm used to MS-DOS hard drive technicalities.
I like the Commodore 64 because it seems like learning how to program it is an extremely useful and simple way to learn about Assembly and Machine code: For context, I am a CS major and took a class years ago dealing with x86 assembly and that felt overwhelming and complicated. I feel like despite the 6502 being quite primitive it's actually a fantastic way to learn about how any computer works. As of now, I'm learning how to do 6502 machine code with a small SBC and that's quite interesting.
I have a few PC booter games like Silent Service and some older comp titles which seem very primitive on the IBM PC. Did the C64 have better ports of these titles? For instance, any of the arcade ports like Outrun, or any of the Microprose games. Did these look better on a C64?
If I do take the plunge on a C64, should I wait for the C64 Ultimate Slimline or should I just get the regular one?