r/AnimalEmancipation

Why Veganism Is the Only Coherent Position
▲ 65 r/AnimalEmancipation+1 crossposts

Why Veganism Is the Only Coherent Position

Veganism is the rejection of the idea that animals exist for human purposes. It recognises that sentient beings are not objects and that no preference, habit or convenience can justify their use. Animal exploitation depends on domination. It treats living beings as instruments and denies their existence as individuals with their own lives.

People should be vegan because the use of animals is not a matter of degree. It is a matter of principle. As long as animals are used, their interests are dismissed and their lives are taken from them. No reform changes this. No regulation changes this. Only the end of use ends the injustice.

To oppose exploitation is to be vegan. Anything else accepts the system that reduces living beings to resources. Be Vegan.

u/ProfessorVegan — 8 days ago
▲ 50 r/AnimalEmancipation+3 crossposts

The Great Dilution: How the True Definition of Veganism Was Systematically Erased (1951–Present)

The Distortion of Veganism —
Veganism was defined by Leslie Cross in 1951 as "the doctrine that man should live without exploiting animals." The founders never redefined it. Everything that followed was distortion.

1953 — John Heron joins the Vegan Society. His first publication proposes a "three-fold approach" diluting veganism into health, spirituality, and animal concern equally.

1957 — Heron becomes president, calls a Special Members Meeting, and the definition disappears from the Constitution.

1960s — Jack Sanderson, editor of The Vegan and BBC face of the Society, recentres veganism from the animal to the practitioner — lifestyle, health, environmental stewardship. The victim disappears.

1971 — Frances Moore Lappé's Diet for a Small Planet reframes plant-based eating as resource efficiency. Feeding the world, not freeing animals.

1975 — Peter Singer's Animal Liberation replaces exploitation with suffering as the moral threshold. Use becomes acceptable if painless. Abolitionism quietly swapped for utilitarian calculus.

1979 / 1988 — A new group introduces a redefinition with three fatal insertions: "as far as is possible and practicable" (the escape clause), "cruelty to" alongside exploitation (welfarist dilution), and "benefit of humans, animals and the environment" (the triple bottom line).

1984 — Kathleen Jannaway founds the Movement for Compassionate Living. Compassion replaces emancipation.

1990s — Industry welfarism. "Humane" labels, certification schemes, market segments.

2010 — "Plant-based" corporate rebrand surgically removes ethical content.

2017 — Tobias Leenaert's How to Create a Vegan World makes incrementalism official. Exploitation reframed as a dial to turn down, not a wrong to end.

The animals cannot resist, testify, escape, or organise. They cannot read the redefinitions. They experience only the material consequence — while the movement above them argues terminology and congratulates itself on half-measures.
The animals were the only reason the word existed. The founders never redefined it. You are here to fix it.

u/ProfessorVegan — 3 days ago