r/AcademicPsychology

▲ 1 r/AcademicPsychology+1 crossposts

(USA) To Professors who are currently working at R1 universities, need your opinions and experiences :)

I have few questions as someone who is looking for career in academia (social sciences and psychology area).

What differently you did in your PhD to be competitive in postdoc and academia position?

How you manage work life balance - in grad school, postdoc and currently as a Professor.

How do you manage doing research, teaching, studying for classes in your PhD?

Any negative and positive aspects you view in academia I should know?

Thanks!!

reddit.com
u/notyourtype9645 — 1 hour ago

Looking for EPPP material, beginning stages of studying

Hi All! I’m in the beginning stages of studying for my EPPP and wanted to know if anyone had material to share before I purchase anything. I greatly appreciate any resources, suggestions or help!

reddit.com
u/Yournameistobi — 15 hours ago

Looking for this psychology paper (can’t access full text)

Hi! I came across this article and I’m really interested in reading it, but I’m currently unable to access the full text through my usual means.

Hostile attributional bias in adults
James Epps & Philip C. Kendall (1995)
Cognitive Therapy and Research

I was wondering if anyone here is familiar with this paper or could point me toward:

  • a summary or key findings
  • related papers on the same topic
  • or legitimate ways to access it

Any help or direction would be really appreciated!

reddit.com
u/Positive_Reindeer134 — 16 hours ago

Updated version of "Thinking, Fast and Slow"?

Hi everyone.

I've recently found out that Kahneman's book has been proved to be presenting some non-factual info and data, the author himself addressed this later on.

I'd like to read a book on somewhat the same themes as "Thinking, Fast and Slow", but more on track with the evolution of the field and with more grounded research.

Is there anything like that around?

reddit.com
u/Soren911 — 2 days ago
▲ 2 r/AcademicPsychology+1 crossposts

BPD - can someone please explain whether a split is psychosis, on the border of psychosis or not psychosis?

Hey guys. I'm Not a therapist or psychiatrist in any way. I'm recently diagnosed with BPD and I am posting here because I have alot of questions and cannot currently afford therapy yet. Please note I am aware that this post may have alot of misinformation, I am not here to perpetuate misinformation but to just show what my uneducated searchings online has yielded, and am looking for correction on anything I've gotten wrong, and more explanations from people who have clinical experience and qualifications.

I understand fully that the original term of BPD being on the border of psychosis and neurosis is outdated. Especially that the term neurosis is particularly outdated.

But I kind of think the term fits well as being on the border of psychosis. I'm curious to know thoughts from experts.

To be clear about something to start: while some people with BPD say they do experience things like hallucinations, voices etc. I do not.

I posted on r/bpd on this post here about this but keep in mind this was 2 weeks ago and I've since then explored it further.

One big aspect of the post was that I was struggling to understand what "being out of touch with reality" meant, because everyone experiences cognitive distortion. For example we all have times where we assume someone is angry with us when they aren't, or people believe in things that aren't true like flat earth. One commenter said that my splitting is NOT psychosis because even if in reality the person isn't abandoning me, my fears about it are still based on real past experiences that have happened. Whereas psychosis wouldn't be founded on that. a large percentage of people ghost me and block me, I do have autism, and of course BPD, so it makes sense that sometimes when people are not replying, I am experiencing being ghosted/blocked in reality.

According to what Claude told me - and please correct me if I'm wrong which is why I'm posting here as I know AI can give misinformation - the prefrontal cortex gets affected and goes, as it said "offline" temporarily. Therefore one is unable to check reality during the split.

In terms of how it FEELS to me, the paranoia I feel seems very out of touch with reality at times. On the other hand, it is due to past trauma so I feel like it also manifests as hypervigilance? I mean, if someone has been assaulted they might fear that happening all the time even when it's not happening again. So is BPD like that? or is it more a quasi-psychosis of breaking from reality temporarily during a split?

This is what claude said after a long discussion with it:

"But the phenomenology you described:

  • Paranoid belief about abandonment
  • No supporting evidence, or evidence to the contrary
  • Unable to access doubt in the moment
  • No hallucinations or voices — purely paranoid ideation
  • Resolves after the stress response subsides
  • Insight returns afterward

That is genuinely the clinical picture of a transient quasi-psychotic episode in BPD. Not schizophrenia, not full psychosis — but not just cognitive distortion either. It sits in its own recognised category between the two."

Again, please note I'm aware this AI, and i'm coming here to check whether this is accurate or not. I'm aware AI can tell you what you want to hear etc.

But to me, finding the answer does seem to be a bit blurry which kinda fits the term of being on the border?

What about the term delusions?

For me, the fact that there is no supporting evidence at times when im splitting, sounds like it could be quasi-psychosis? If not, what makes it different in terms of the processes happening in the brain?

reddit.com
u/AntiqueSignpost — 2 days ago
▲ 34 r/AcademicPsychology+1 crossposts

Will smaller universities survive an education recession?

Preface: I know none of you (nor I) can predict the future. However, I'd love insights from more seasoned professors.

I have been trying to estimate where academia in the United States ends up in 5, 10, or 20 years given I am still fairly early in my own career (Psychology at SLAC). Namely, I see 1) the gradual decline of ROI's from bachelors degrees for undergraduates (be that due to oversupply or otherwise), and 2) the erosion of academic standards at the hands of grade inflation, ChatGPT, and increasing class sizes that shrink a professor's ability to give students feedback as existential threats to higher ed.

We are allowing millions of students to take out hundreds of thousands in debt with shrinking ability to pay those loans back. Furthermore, it feels like the public is increasingly seeing higher education institutions as fraudulent - even after controlling for the current admin. Is this not an almost perfect parallel to the 2007-2008 financial crisis, in which a system that is supposed to produce value and regulate itself is packaged and sold irresponsibly? And more importantly, if that is the case and the crash is looming, where is the cutoff for institutions that survive versus go belly up? I just want to know whether I need to jump up to an R1 to weather the storm or if R2 institutions will survive decreased enrollment.

reddit.com
u/vigilanterepoman — 3 days ago
▲ 5 r/AcademicPsychology+1 crossposts

master thesis - the psychology of gaming

https://preview.redd.it/jjpcl9kaxkyg1.png?width=794&format=png&auto=webp&s=dd66a35ddcb7d969e47c083e2b9b74358e193e56

I used to be a heavy gamer when i was younger (especially RPGs like Star Wars etc), and back then I wish I’d had more control over my gaming habits so I could have focused more on my goals in other areas (school, social life, etc.). I am now a psychology student and have the privilege of writing my master’s thesis on the very interesting topic of the psychology of gaming.

In this study you will find a simple training that includes several behavioral psychology mechanisms to gain better control over ur gaming habits. From the comfort of your home, no meetings/face-to-face contact needed, you will stay anonymous throughout the study.

If you’re struggling with the following or similar issues—or are at least aware of them—then this training is perfect for you:

  • Are you neglecting other areas of your life (social life, school/college/work, etc.) because of your gaming habits?
  • Did you just want to unwind a bit by gaming, but find that you can’t really stop anymore?
  • Do you often find yourself thinking about your next video game while you’re doing something completely different?

If this sounds familiar, I am your father. just study the brief information of the attached flyer. You can find more detailed info in the link or the QR-code, which will lead you to a short registration survey (about 3-5 min).

https://www.sosci.geronto.phil.fau.de/gaming_fau/?q=Registrierung&r=red

(In following studies, this training will be designed to help especially children and adolescents to use gaming as a healthy hobby).

Thank you very much, Hedgehog

PS: If there are also Germans here: The study is available also in German (just click DE/EN below the survey to switch between languages).

reddit.com
u/Hedgehog___77 — 22 hours ago

Psych student writes questionable equation

E=Cm^2

Fascinated with neuron speed at the moment. Originally was written as Einsteins E=mc2, the student compared to neuron=behaviourxstimulus2 as an explanation to neurons firing.

No wrong answers this is a fun hypothetical.

reddit.com
u/Complete-Mission9408 — 4 days ago
▲ 4 r/AcademicPsychology+2 crossposts

Alumni of Chicago School PsyD, what are you currently doing?

Just wanted to check in with the alumni of the Chicago school (preferably the Chicago campus)

What are you currently doing in the professional field and do you think the program prepared you well for your career and the EPPP test?

reddit.com
u/Adventurous-Kiwi4568 — 4 days ago

Looking for research involvement, feeling discouraged and lost

I could use any advice to stand out and get where I want to be. have a BA in psych and have been working as a tech in inpatient psychiatry for two years since I graduated. I started in psych naive like most everyone else, said “I’ll be a clinical psychologist” with zero understanding of how academia works. I had a 3.7 GPA taking honors college courses, had a 4.0 major GPA. I got a little research experience but it was in ABA and was mostly monkey-pressing-button work, lots of just entering qualitative data into excel sheets. No posters, no papers. I let myself get very depressed toward the end of school, ended up quitting the lab. Worked night shift at the hospital, stayed depressed, then moved to day shift and realized how much I love the patient interaction. Inpatient has blessed me with reassurance in my field and a directed passion for finding clinical interventions for delinquent behaviors. To me, this entails a deep understanding of behavioral neuroscience, neurodevelopmental disorders, and more acute psychopathology.

I start my program in CHMC in the fall and I’m super excited. However, I still have this terrible feeling weighing on me now that I’m “awake,” almost like grief. I have always been academically inclined and I feel like I threw it away for depression and timidity in undergrad. When I was younger I always imagined I’d research something impactful and profound, but now I feel like I’ve wasted so much time and potential. I follow people that are in academia and I want so badly to get involved. There are labs with projects related to behavioral neuroscience, c/a psychopathology, and maladaptive behaviors, but I don’t know how to get my foot in the door as a counseling graduate student. Many positions seem to be reserved for undergrads. I reached out to a couple labs but got very vague responses indicating they will contact me IF there are opportunities as they move forward.

I’ll take absolutely any advice. My wish for a doctorate down the road is uncertain, but I know for sure I want to at least spend some time in research I’m passionate about. Is there anything I can say or do to strengthen my odds of recruitment?

reddit.com
u/nads825 — 4 days ago

Trying to make counseling skill acquisition more deliberate — looking for feedback on a practice workflow

I’m moving from software engineering into counseling training.
One issue I ran into: communication competency improves with repeated, structured practice, but many learners lack a consistent workflow outside formal training settings.

I built a small website to test a practice loop:

  1. run a scenario drill
  2. complete guided reflection
  3. review progress over time

Would love feedback from students/research-minded folks:
Does this kind of structured loop align with how you think skills should be trained?

If allowed, I can share the project link in comments.

reddit.com
u/SkyEnvironmental6118 — 3 days ago
▲ 0 r/AcademicPsychology+4 crossposts

THE UTILITY OF FREE WILL HAS EXPIRED

Accurate Understanding No Longer Costs You Your Life.

The debate about free will is not a philosophical debate.

It is a threat response wearing philosophical clothing.

When a nervous system detects that a framework it depends on for social coordination is being destabilized, it generates urgency. Generates alarm. Generates arguments that feel like reasoning but are downstream of the threat signal..

Not upstream of it.

The philosophical defense of free will is exhaust. Post-hoc residue of a neurochemical process that had already decided what outcome to protect before the first sentence was formed.

This is not a criticism directed at any particular thinker, school, or text. It is a description of the mechanism that produces all of them.. Including this one.

THE SCALE PROBLEM

The Homo genus is nearly 3 million years old.

Homo sapiens fossils date back at least 300,000 years. The biological lineage extends further.. 800,000 years is not an unreasonable estimate depending on which markers are used. And sapiens was not the only human species. Neanderthals. Denisovans. Homo heidelbergensis. Homo erectus, running for nearly 2 million years. Multiple lineages. Multiple nervous systems processing, coordinating, surviving, dying.

None of them had the concept of free will.

Not because they lacked it or not. Because the concept simply didn’t exist. There was no word for it. No philosophical framework around it. No debate. No idea, no thought.

Organisms processed. Behavior followed. The processing was not accompanied by a narrative about the processing being chosen.

The concept of free will.. As a named, debated, institutionalized idea.. Is historically recent. A few thousand years old at most. Against 3 million years of the genus. Against the biological depth of the lineage.

That proportion is the context.

Everything built on the free will framework.. Guilt architecture, moral responsibility systems, legal accountability structures, the entire emotional scaffolding of desert and blame.. Sits on a few thousand years of conceptual history inside a lineage that ran for millions of years without it.

This is not an argument that the concept is wrong.

It is a description of its scale relative to the organism that generated it.

THE MIND PROBLEM

No one has ever measured a mind.

Not weighed it. Not located it. Not isolated it, photographed it, traced its boundaries, identified its substrate, or demonstrated its existence as a thing distinct from the organ producing the behavior attributed to it.

The mind has never been found.

What exists: a brain. An organ. Approximately 1.4 kilograms of electrochemical processing tissue running prediction models against incoming sensory data, updating probability distributions, generating outputs including the output called “experience of having a mind.”

That output.. The felt sense of an inner mental space, a thinking subject, a seat of cognition that observes and deliberates and chooses.. Is itself one of the brain’s predictions. The brain models a self that has a mind. The model runs. The experience of the model running is mistaken for evidence that what the model describes exists.

The instrument is hallucinating its own operator and calling the hallucination real.

What the evidence actually shows.

The brain is a predictive organ. Not a recording device. Not a passive receiver. A system that constructs experience from prior models, fills gaps with plausible interpolation, and delivers the finished product as perception.. As reality, directly encountered.

The color you see is not the color that exists.

The brain assigns color from wavelength data filtered through prediction. The continuity of your visual field is fabricated.. There is a blind spot in each eye where the optic nerve connects, and the brain patches it with interpolated content generated from surrounding data. You have never seen that patch. You have never noticed the gap. The organ filled it before experience arrived.

This is not a peripheral quirk of visual processing. This is the architecture. The brain does not deliver reality. It delivers a model of reality that has been optimized for survival-relevant prediction, not for accuracy.

Perception is hallucination that happens to be useful.

The "mind".. the inner space where thinking occurs, where decisions are made, where experience happens.. Is only a small part of the model. Not the modeler. The brain generates the experience of a mind the same way it generates the experience of a continuous visual field:

By producing a coherent output from fragmented, gapped, prediction-interpolated processing, and delivering it as immediate reality.

There is no mind having the experience. There is processing producing the experience of a mind having experiences.

The assumption operating as fact.

Entire institutions are built on this assumption.

Departments of philosophy of mind. Cognitive science programs. Psychotherapy systems. Legal frameworks assigning mental states to defendants. Psychiatric diagnostic manuals cataloguing disorders of a thing whose existence has not been established.

The field of consciousness studies.. A multi-decade, heavily funded, academically prestigious research program.. Has produced no consensus on what consciousness is, where it is, or how matter produces it. This is not a sign that the question is difficult. It is a sign that the question may be built on a category error. That researchers are searching for the location of something that does not exist as a locatable thing — the same way medieval scholars could not locate the seat of the soul because there was no soul to locate.

The "hard problem of consciousness".. Why physical processes produce subjective experience.. Is treated as the deepest unsolved problem in science. It is framed as mysterious, profound, possibly beyond human comprehension.

BUT that is completely BS and the alternative explanation is: There is no hard problem. There is a brain generating the model of a subject having experiences. The mystery is the model describing itself as mysterious. The hard problem is the prediction engine producing a prediction that its own operation is inexplicable, and then treating that prediction as evidence of depth rather than as evidence of the prediction engine’s limitations in modeling itself.

The entire architecture of the problem is built inside the assumption it would need to dissolve to see clearly.

Time. Mind. The arbitrary made universal.

The mind sits in the same category as time.

Time is not a fact about the universe. It is a cognitive construct.. A model the brain uses to organize sequential processing into navigable experience. Physicists have known for over a century that time is not a universal constant. It dilates with velocity and gravity. At the quantum scale, the arrow of time breaks down entirely. What we experience as the flow of time.. The felt sense of past, present, future as a continuous stream.. Is ENTIRELY a neurological production. A model. Not a feature of reality that the model accurately reflects.

The mind is the same class of object.

A cognitive construct that the brain produces for processing efficiency, mistaken for a real thing that exists independently of the production process. Language then stabilizes the construct.. Gives it a name, builds categories around it, generates entire philosophical traditions treating the named thing as a phenomenon requiring explanation rather than as a naming process requiring examination.

Once named, the construct becomes socially real. Institutions organize around it. Funding follows. Careers are built on its study. The social reality of the construct is then mistaken for evidence of its objective reality.

This is not unique to mind. It is the standard mechanism by which cognitive constructs become cultural facts. The brain generates a model. Language names it. Institutions ossify it. The ossified category is then treated as a discovery rather than a construction.

Mind. Soul. Time. Free will. Consciousness. Self.

The same process. The same mechanism. Different points on the same continuum of the brain modeling its own operation, naming the model, and forgetting that the name preceded the thing.

The scientific idiocy problem.

It would be considered scientific idiocy to build a research program around the location of phlogiston after phlogiston had been shown not to exist. To fund departments studying the properties of the luminiferous ether after the Michelson-Morley experiment. To develop diagnostic systems for disorders of the four humors.

Those frameworks were abandoned when the things they posited were demonstrated not to exist as posited.

The mind has never been demonstrated to exist as posited.

The response to this observation.. In academic contexts, in philosophical circles, in everyday conversation.. Is not to examine the assumption. It is to treat the assumption as so obvious that examining it signals confusion. Of course the mind exists. You’re using yours right now. The felt certainty of having a mind is taken as proof of the mind.

This is the prediction engine treating its own output as external verification.

The felt certainty is the model. The model producing the felt certainty of its own reality is not evidence of its reality. It is evidence of how thoroughly the model runs.

A sufficiently immersive hallucination includes the hallucination of certainty that the hallucination is real.

The entire neuroscience of mind-talk.. The assumption that mental states exist as distinct entities that cause behavior, that belief and desire and intention are real things that brain states implement.. Is FOLK PSYCHOLOGY formalized into research methodology. It is the organism’s self-model being used as the conceptual framework for studying the organism’s self-model.

The instrument is contaminated from the first assumption.

WHO GENERATED THE CONCEPT

The Mesopotamian legal codes. The Greek philosophical tradition. The emergence of formalized moral frameworks.

The 99.9% of the population alive during those millennia was illiterate.

Not occasionally illiterate. Structurally, systemically, by design illiterate.

[ LINK TO FULL POST ]

u/Sad-Mycologist6287 — 6 days ago
▲ 19 r/AcademicPsychology+1 crossposts

Formal proof that Raven matrices have no unique solution without assuming a transformation grammar — feedback welcome

I'm an independent researcher (CNC machinist by trade, no academic affiliation) who encountered intelligence test items and noticed that the uniqueness of the expected answer was assumed rather than demonstrated.

I wrote a short paper that formalizes this via Lagrange interpolation for numerical sequences, and extends it to Raven matrices with a conditional uniqueness theorem. The main result is that every distractor in a multiple-choice Raven item corresponds to a logically valid completion under some rule outside the standard grammar.

I'm aware that the non-uniqueness of numerical sequences has been noted before — Sternberg and others have made the observation at a conceptual level, and the broader philosophical problem connects to Goodman's new riddle of induction and Quine's underdetermination. What I don't find in the literature is a compact formal proof via Lagrange interpolation applied to psychometric items, nor a rigorous extension of the same argument to Raven matrices with an explicit grammar-based conditional uniqueness result and a distractor corollary. If I've missed something, I'd genuinely like to know.

I'm not claiming tests are useless, the argument is narrower than that. Looking for feedback, especially from anyone who knows this literature better than I do.

doi.org
u/AntDry6108 — 6 days ago

Southern Oregon University MS CMHC

Hi all! I got off the waitlist for SOU CMHC program, and would love to hear anyones experience with the program. From what I have seen online it looks like a good option, but I have not heard many firsthand experiences.

I have also seen that the school is having financial troubles, but am unsure how this would impact students going into the school and the program over the next couple of years.

If anyone has advice or opinions I would love to hear them.

TIA :)

reddit.com
u/Jealous-Constant1647 — 4 days ago

To Professors who are currently working at R1 universities, need your opinions and experiences :)

I have few questions as someone who is looking for career in academia (social psychology area).

What differently you did in your PhD to be competitive in postdoc and academia position?

How you manage work life balance - in grad school, postdoc and currently as a Professor.

How do you manage doing research, teaching, studying for classes in your PhD?

Any negative and positive aspects you view in academia I should know?

Thanks!!

reddit.com
u/notyourtype9645 — 3 days ago
▲ 4 r/AcademicPsychology+2 crossposts

👋Welcome to r/therapistindia - Read First!

Are you a therapist, psychologist, counsellor ?

We finally have a space for us — r/therapistindia

A dedicated subreddit for Indian therapists to:

• discuss difficult cases (ethically & anonymously)

• seek professional advice and peer support

• share referrals and trusted resources

• talk about private practice, supervision, burnout, and career growth

• rant about the struggles no one else understands

• discuss the unique realities of practicing therapy in India

There are many global therapy communities, but very few spaces that truly understand the Indian context like our clients, families, stigma, systems, fees, ethics, and challenges.

This subreddit is built to be that safe professional community.

Whether you're experienced in the field or just starting your journey, your voice matters here.

Let’s build a strong Indian therapist community together.

Join us at r/therapistindia and help create the space we all needed.

reddit.com
u/Schizophrenic_God — 6 days ago

Why does sexual desirability play such a strong role in self-esteem compared with other sources of validation?

Many discussions suggest that attention or attraction from the opposite sex can help repair low self-esteem, even in cases where a partner or ex-partner has previously damaged that confidence. Why does validation through sexual or romantic desirability often seem to have such a strong psychological impact compared with other forms of confidence building, such as career achievement, volunteering, artistic expression, or physical activities like dance?

What psychological or social mechanisms explain why sexual desirability appears to influence self-esteem so strongly?

reddit.com
u/Upper-Eye-8753 — 7 days ago

AI Tools For Formatting For APA-7

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for recommendations for reliable AI tools that can help with APA 7 formatting, especially for psychology papers.

I’m not looking for something to write the paper for me. I mainly need help with things like:

  • reference list formatting
  • in-text citations
  • hanging indents
  • title page / headings
  • checking whether sources are formatted correctly
  • catching small APA 7 mistakes

Are there any AI tools, citation managers, or workflows you recommend for APA 7? Ideally something that is accurate enough for academic psychology work, not just “mostly okay.”

Thanks!

reddit.com
u/RonAshe — 5 days ago