r/AIToolsPromptWorkflow

AI Tool	What it’s used for
ChatGPT	Writing, ideas, drafts, everyday problem-solving
BrandStory AI	Structuring ideas, planning content flow (landing pages, messaging, and overall clarity)
Jasper AI	Marketing copy, ads, and content creation
Frase	SEO briefs, content research, and optimization
Surfer SEO	On-page SEO optimization and content ranking help

⚙️ PROMPT #58294: Fintech Innovations – Explore & Apply

Act as an expert fintech analyst and innovation consultant. Provide a comprehensive overview of the latest financial technology trends, focusing on areas relevant to [industry or sector, e.g., banking, insurance, payments]. Summarize 3-5 breakthrough fintech innovations from the last 2 years, such as AI-driven fraud detection, blockchain-based settlements, embedded finance, open banking, or digital lending platforms. For each innovation, explain the core technology, real-world applications, major benefits, and potential challenges or risks. Then, give actionable recommendations on how a business like [describe business type, e.g., regional credit union, online retailer, SME lender] can strategically assess, pilot, or integrate these innovations to improve customer experience, efficiency, or competitiveness. Where relevant, suggest key performance indicators (KPIs) to track success and address any compliance or data security considerations. Make the analysis concise and tailored to [user's target location or market, e.g., Southeast Asia, EU, USA].

copy and paste this prompt 🤖

I used to think better prompts = better outputs. And yeah it helps, but still ran into stuff that sounded right but wasn’t.

Now I try to get multiple angles. Ask same thing in diff ways and compare where answers don’t line up. That’s usually where the issue is.

I found tools like QuestionCraft, StarCastle, and Nestr that help compare responses or show disagreement. Useful, but feels like extra steps you shouldn’t need.

Feels like AI tools should just have built-in disagreement instead of always giving one polished answer. idk if it’s a model thing or product thing

I’ve been using ChatGPT for school-related stuff since a few months after it first came out. While I occasionally try other AI tools, it’s usually just briefly, and ChatGPT is still the only one I use consistently.

I’ve noticed that a lot of people use different AIs for different purposes, so I’m curious what you all recommend. The main ways I use AI are:

• Answering everyday questions (kind of like a search engine)

• Learning about different topics

• Getting help understanding STEM concepts

For each of these use cases, which AIs would you recommend? And for someone like me, are any of the paid versions or subscriptions actually worth it, or is free enough?

Hey everyone,

I’m trying to figure out what AI image generation models are actually worth using right now mainly looking for something that’s both good quality and relatively cheap.

I’ve been hearing a lot about FLUX (especially FLUX Schnell / Dev), and that it’s pretty strong in terms of quality vs cost.

From what I understand, it’s one of the newer open-weight models and competes pretty well with things like Midjourney and DALL·E in terms of realism and prompt accuracy.

Curious what people here think:

- Is FLUX actually the best option right now for cost vs quality?

- Are there better alternatives you’d recommend?

- What are you personally using for image generation these days?

Would love to hear real experiences before I commit to something.

A few of them actually thanked us for the audit before we even mentioned working together. that had never happened with any other approach we had tried

most people use free audits completely wrong and then wonder why nobody converts. i know because we did it wrong for the first few months too

the standard approach is putting a button on your website that says get a free audit, hopping on a call, and spending 45 minutes doing a sales presentation disguised as helpful feedback. the prospect came in thinking they were getting help and leaves feeling like they sat through an infomercial. our conversion rate doing it that way was around 10 to 15 percent and the people who did convert took forever to decide because they felt unsure about us

the shift happened when we stopped treating the audit as a sales tool and started treating it as an actual deliverable

when volume picked up we brought in a VA through u/OffshoreWolf for the research and prep side, college educated, english fluent, around $4 to $5 an hour. she handles the initial data pull and competitor research before we write the actual audit. the written audit still comes from us but having the research done saves 25 to 30 minutes per audit which adds up fast when you are doing several a week

here is exactly what changed

we stopped doing the audit live on a call. we now collect information upfront via a short form, do the actual audit work on our end, and send them a real written document before we ever get on a call

the form is 8 questions. what channels they are using, their average client value, what they have tried before that did not work, where they feel most stuck. takes them 7 minutes to fill out and tells us almost everything we need to make the audit genuinely useful

then we spend 45 minutes to an hour doing the actual audit and send them a written breakdown. not a pdf with our logo and fancy design. a google doc with real observations and specific things they can act on whether they hire us or not

that last part is critical. the audit has to be useful even if they never pay us a dollar. if the only way it makes sense is if they hire you it is not an audit it is a sales deck

what the document actually looks like

• we cover 4 to 5 areas depending on the business

• lead gen channels

• follow up process

• offer clarity

• content if they have

• any referral setup sometimes

we write specific observations not vague ones. not your messaging could be clearer. something like your homepage has 3 different calls to action pointing to 3 different things, a visitor does not know whether to book a call, download something, or fill out a form, and that confusion is probably costing you inquiries

we keep it to 2 to 3 pages maximum. our first few were 8 to 10 pages and people were overwhelmed before the call even happened. shorter is better, you want them to read the whole thing

we always start with what they are actually doing well before getting into what to fix. not fake positivity, real observations. pointing out problems without acknowledging what works makes people defensive and they stop listening

we never include pricing in the document. people start doing math in their head and stop reading. save that for the call

we never end with a pitch. we end with a question that invites a conversation, something like the thing we are most curious about after looking at this is x, would love to hear how you have been thinking about it. it makes the call feel like a continuation of a conversation that already started

the numbers after changing the approach

70 percent of people who receive the audit book the call

40 percent of those become clients within 3 weeks

compared to 10 to 15 percent conversion with the old live call approach

on the actual call they already have the audit in front of them so we are not presenting anything. we are just having a conversation. they come in having already read our thinking and already knowing we understand their situation

the close comes from them asking what it would look like to work together. not from us pitching. that question comes up organically because the document already answered whether we know what we are talking about

things we learned the hard way

the audit has to be specific to them not templated, if they can tell you sent the same thing to everyone it destroys the whole effect

turnaround time matters, we aim to send within 48 hours of receiving the form, when we were taking 5 to 6 days our book rate dropped noticeably

do not offer audits to everyone, we only send them to businesses that fit a specific profile, if someone is way outside our wheelhouse we send the doc anyway and wish them well but do not book the call

the thing i am still not sure about is how to scale this without losing the personal feel. right now every audit is genuinely custom and that is part of what makes it work. i have thought about a more templated version but i worry it just becomes the glorified sales deck with a fancy name that everyone else is doing

if you are currently doing free audits and not converting well drop a comment describing what your current audit looks like and i will tell you specifically what i would change. not a pitch, just a genuine look at it. sometimes one small structural thing makes the whole thing click differently

what is your current conversion rate from audit to paid client and does the prospect usually bring up working together or do you have to raise it yourself?

This post is only about those who pay for subscriptions.

When ChatGPT costs you $20/Month you are wasting money & time.

Don't get me wrong ChatGPT is still good, but only Using ChatGPT is not the best option.

When you have Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Etc... All these other models who have some advantages than ChatGPT it wouldn't make sense to just use ChatGPT

But also spending money on each of those is also a waste of money.

So what should you do instead?

Use Our Service. (I know its cheesy but it make sense just hear me out)

I have Claude, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, ETC... All within the latest Models for $20/Month

Now you are already spending $20/Month but for only ChatGPT

ON THE OTHER HAND

However, with us you are getting 40+ other different Models...

SO, Please give it a try before you judge it.

I personally use it everyday and loving it.

Don't knock it till you try it.

Been trying to turn my tracks into videos but most tools just generate random clips that dont really match the song.

Is there anything that actually follows the structure and makes a full video without a lot of editing?

>