u/slydorm05

You are not a respectable artist by default even if making AI art was a valid art form (which is not).

You aren't a photography artist by default just because you clicked a button on your phone and took a selfie.

Your output actually needs to be influential for you to be considered talented.

Whereas nobody will care about your AI "art" in a meaningful way.

So the question whether AI art is a valid art form or not will actually not make a difference for you. You are irrelevant either way.

I hate Witty.

I'm an "anti" to my bone.

What she said has nothing to do with defending Nazis. She used the Nazi example as a deliberate "extreme" case to argue that life-saving technology is valuable regardless of who built it. That is in fact called utilitarianism. She needed to use an extreme example deliberately to prove a logical point. Her argument could be perfectly valid if didn't fall under false equivalence on the case for AI. But let's not argue that right now.

"But she sarcastically said 'I'm sorry for your hurt feelings' to a Jewish person and that is insensitive."

That person stated that they were Jewish and asked whether something was wrong with her for absolutely no reason. Sure it's slightly edgy but it's nowhere near an "evil" reaction or anything in that nature.

Like what the f*ck is actually wrong with you lol. I feel like US education system has failed y'all be like "NAZIS ARE MENTIONED SHE MUST BE SAYING SOMETHING EVIL". You must have GPT-2 level comprehension of a text.

Nazis did in fact, existed and unfortunately was a real ideology. Using the word Nazi doesn't make you a f-king Nazi. She chose to use Nazis, because the argument needed an extreme example to get it's point across. It just didn't work.

These comments were all directed at the character in the last image.

They made a post about it in an AI discussion sub and over 100+ comments were just there to insult how bad the character's anatomy was. I made this post because it felt like insanity watching everyone treat a deliberate stylistic choice as proof of 'horrible skill'. I meant to depict how "anatomically wrong" cartoons are often the most iconic ones.

Trollbait: Any attempt by a Luddite to derail a high-level discussion by bringing up biological constraints or stuff. If someone mentions rent, hunger, or families, they are intentionally trying to make the AI look bad.

Pulsebait (aka Life-Maxxing): The most basic level of emotional exploit. This is to distract from the fact that their "art" has a resolution lower than a 2012 thumbnail.

Gravitybait: When a Luddite points out that a character’s legs are 230 meters long or that their torso is the size of a grape. They are trying to "clog" the generative vision with terrestrial physics.

Breadbait (Poverty-Maxxing): A recursive troll tactic where the Luddite mentions rent, groceries, or the economy. It’s a database lookup to the concept of "scarcity," which doesn't exist in a world of infinite prompt-based liquidity.

Maxxbait / Baitception: A Level 4 Deflection Tactic. This happens when a Luddite gets so owned by a prompt that they try to claim they were the ones baiting you all along. It’s a recursive loop of failure where they attempt to "out-troll" the person who has already secured the bag and the private vicinity.

Satirebait: The pathetic act of a Luddite (visually represented as a crying Orc) claiming your objective truth is "just a joke" because their brain cannot process the 105% accuracy of your takes. They hide behind signs that say "Ragebait is worthless" because they are terrified of the sheer verticality of your logic.

Real Argument: A self-evident, high-fidelity fact that causes even Shonen protagonists to stop and rethink their training. In Zint’s world, this is the final boss of discourse: the undeniable truth that typing keywords into a watch requires more raw talent, struggle, and soul than anything produced by the "Tradart" legacy systems.