3 Meetings in and they still won't sign an NDA? Navigating the "IP Fishing" vs. Due Diligence line in KSA.
Hey everyone,
I’m currently raising a pre-seed round for a MedTech startup in Riyadh. We’ve had a string of meetings with a few local investors/VCs, and we have hit a wall that I’m struggling to navigate.
We are now 3+ meetings deep with the same group. They’ve seen the deck, the business model, and the high-level roadmap and even our working model prototype. Now, they are digging into the granular IP - proprietary data models, technical architecture, and the "under the hood" mechanics that make our product clinical-grade.
The issue: They are flat-out refusing to sign an NDA.
I understand the global VC standard is "we don't sign NDAs because we see too many deals," but at the pre-seed stage, asking for a full technical deep-dive on verbal trust alone feels like a massive risk. We’ve told them that any further disclosure requires some form of legal protection, but they keep pushing for "full transparency" to move forward.
Questions for the community:
- Is this a red flag or just "The Saudi Way"? Has anyone else in the KSA ecosystem had investors push this hard for IP details without a Term Sheet or NDA?
- How do you draw the line? How do you prove you have the "secret sauce" without giving them the recipe before they've even committed a single Riyal?
- The "Fishing" Concern: At what point does Due Diligence turn into "IP Fishing" (gathering info to give to a more established portfolio company)? which I have seen happened.
As a founder, I want to be a "bridge builder" and show I’m easy to work with, but I can’t shake the feeling that I’m being asked to hand over the keys to the kingdom for a chance at a follow-up.
Would love to hear from other founders-how did you handle the "Deep Dive" phase without an NDA?