
Something I've noticed while beta-reading lately...
A lot of manuscripts aren't bad, there's just a wide gap between what the writer intended and what the readers are perceiving. Some of the case I've widely experienced are:
- The plot and dialogues are good, but the characters are flat, i.e., one character's tone is similar to another. That's a classic case of a new writer using AI's help to write a particular scene. And the best remedy for that is helping the writer shape the characters and giving feedback on character development.
- The dialogues are perfect, but the writer is using action markers like "smirked" and "lips curled", etc too many times. That's a writer who needs feedback not on plot or character development, but more on pacing and narration along with where to "show" and "tell."
- Some writers end up having plot holes just because of a slight problem with character motivation, or time gaps between scenes, etc.
And most of the time, the writer already feels this. They just can’t pinpoint it. That's why beta readers are so important.
That’s honestly my favourite part of beta reading! Giving feedback that the writer needs, not just wants!
If you're seeking someone who will go above and beyond your expectations, without using any AI, send me a DM. It doesn't primarily have to be about a manuscript; you can also reach out to me for writing help or simply for advice.
Acknowledged for beta-reading services in John Russell's rom-com named, Among the Vines.
I primarily read second-chance romance, paranormal fantasy, crime and mystery thrillers, and other genres.
Genres that're so much better with a bit of coffee and a book in hand.
Hope this helps!
Sara.