u/researcher_8651

PhD decision: CUHK (QS ~32, strong supervisor) vs Tokyo (lower QS) aiming for academia

everyone,

I’ve received two PhD offers in Geography and need some advice:

•	CUHK (Hong Kong, QS \\\~32) well-known supervisor, strong global ranking

•	Tokyo (Japan) good program, but much lower QS ranking

My goal is to build a career in academia/research.

I’m unsure what matters more long-term:

•	University ranking vs supervisor reputation

•	Research output/network vs institution prestige

CUHK seems stronger on paper, but I’ve heard PhD success depends more on publications and supervision.

What would you choose and why?

Would going with a lower-ranked university hurt my chances in academia?

Both are fully funded positions

reddit.com
u/researcher_8651 — 4 hours ago

PhD decision: CUHK (QS ~32, strong supervisor) vs Tokyo (lower QS) aiming for academia

everyone,

I’ve received two PhD offers in Geography and need some advice:

•	CUHK (Hong Kong, QS \\\~32) well-known supervisor, strong global ranking

•	Tokyo (Japan) good program, but much lower QS ranking

My goal is to build a career in academia/research.

I’m unsure what matters more long-term:

•	University ranking vs supervisor reputation

•	Research output/network vs institution prestige

CUHK seems stronger on paper, but I’ve heard PhD success depends more on publications and supervision.

What would you choose and why?

Would going with a lower-ranked university hurt my chances in academia?

Both are fully funded positions

reddit.com
u/researcher_8651 — 4 hours ago