PhD decision: CUHK (QS ~32, strong supervisor) vs Tokyo (lower QS) aiming for academia
everyone,
I’ve received two PhD offers in Geography and need some advice:
• CUHK (Hong Kong, QS \\\~32) well-known supervisor, strong global ranking
• Tokyo (Japan) good program, but much lower QS ranking
My goal is to build a career in academia/research.
I’m unsure what matters more long-term:
• University ranking vs supervisor reputation
• Research output/network vs institution prestige
CUHK seems stronger on paper, but I’ve heard PhD success depends more on publications and supervision.
What would you choose and why?
Would going with a lower-ranked university hurt my chances in academia?
Both are fully funded positions