Can astrophotography be too automated?
Clickbait title because clearly everybody here really enjoys their DL.
I saw my friend's DL3 in action for the first time this weekend and was amazed at what it produced. I'm seriously considering a purchase right now but am wondering if it can take the fun out of astrophotography by automating the process so much. He had stunning images and barely lifted a finger and I thought "with so little involvement, you could just download an image of that nebula".
I'm obviously wrong, because so many people here love them, but I'm interested in your reasoning for why I'm wrong.
Perhaps a full astrophotography setup is too expensive or time consuming, and this makes it accessible.
Perhaps you don't have the time to spend on processing images.
Perhaps you still do it manually with the raw images and therefore it's not automated.
I'm really interested in what makes you love this, and why you do this rather than go all in on big kit.