u/jimbobbins

I built a stablecoin technical reference - contract addresses, EIP/ERC matrix deep dives and compliance & wallet blacklist checker
▲ 10 r/ethereum+1 crossposts

I built a stablecoin technical reference - contract addresses, EIP/ERC matrix deep dives and compliance & wallet blacklist checker

Hi everyone, I got tired of trawling through docs and block explorers every time I needed a stablecoin contract address or wanted to check which tokens support permit signatures, so I built a reference site!

I wanted to introduce stablemoney.dev

Covering:

  • 12 major stablecoins (USDT, USDC, DAI, PYUSD, GHO, RLUSD, etc.)
  • Contract addresses for every major EVM chain
  • EIP/ERC compliance matrix (ERC-20, permit, proxies, compliance hooks, flash loans etc)
  • On-chain wallet compliance checker (read-only eth_call - checks onchain blacklist/freeze status)
  • Opinionated risk notes per coin
  • Basic Market cap from DefiLlama, refreshed daily

OpenSource, no wallet connection needed, MIT licensed.

Would love feedback from anyone building with stablecoins. What’s missing that would save you time?

https://preview.redd.it/i2c8rdbtaw1h1.png?width=2040&format=png&auto=webp&s=0237b44cb3ba15461006e88c8271d1d2a50e9cdc

reddit.com
u/jimbobbins — 2 days ago
▲ 12 r/ethereum+1 crossposts

I’ve been building a small Ethereum consensus-layer side project and would appreciate technical feedback:

https://ethsync.wtf

It visualises what happens during an Ethereum Sync Committee in real time, including:

- sync committee health / participation

- BLS signature aggregation

- RANDAO-based validator selection

- light client verification using compact proofs

The aim is to make the mechanics easier to inspect and explain, especially for developers, home stakers, node operators, and people learning how Ethereum light clients work.

I’d be particularly interested in feedback on:

- whether any of the consensus explanations are wrong or misleading

- whether the BLS / light client sections are clear enough

- what data or debug views would make it more useful for devs

- whether there are better ways to represent committee participation visually

Happy to answer questions and I hope you like it!

u/jimbobbins — 23 days ago