Best contrast strategy to identify condition-specific effects (C vs D and E) in limma
Hi everyone,
I’m working on an RNA-seq dataset with three different drug treatments (let’s call them C, D, and E) and I’m trying to understand whether drug C acts differently from the other two, and if so, in what way.
I’m using a standard limma-voom pipeline and I’m a bit unsure about the best strategy to define contrasts for this question.
Current approaches I’m considering:
1. Pairwise contrasts + intersection
- C vs D
- C vs E Then:
- identify DE genes in each contrast
- take the intersection (possibly also requiring same direction of logFC)
The idea would be that genes consistently different in both contrasts represent a “C-specific signature”.
2. Combined contrast
- C − (D + E) / 2
This would directly test whether C differs from the average effect of D and E.
From a statistical and biological interpretation standpoint, which approach is more appropriate for identifying C-specific effects?
Any advice or references would be really appreciated.
Thanks in advance!