u/electivire24

Image 1 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting
Image 2 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting
Image 3 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting
Image 4 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting
Image 5 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting
Image 6 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting
Image 7 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting
Image 8 — REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting

REPOST: Sudani Results W/ Improvised Fitting

This is meant to be an update on my previous post.

Okay, so I re-ran my models from a few days ago using a Global fit, and the results are noticeably better—especially for the Medieval period. The fits are tighter overall and line up well with multiple Vahaduo runs I did using my G25 coordinates.

Main Result:
Sudanese Nubians/Arabs are best modeled as a 3-way mix of:

  • Medieval Nubians
  • Additional Nilotic/Cushitic ancestry
  • Arabian-related input

Meanwhile, Medieval Nubians themselves fall along a 2-way cline:

  • Deep Nilotic (“Dinka-like”) ancestry native to Sudan/South Sudan
  • An ancient Northeast African component linked to populations native to modern day Egypt

The local Northeast African component is better proxied in models using West Eurasian-related ancestry and is believed to be a Natufian-like Egyptian hunter gatherer population.

Overall, this lines up pretty well with what we’d expect historically: continuity from indigenous Nilotic populations + a Northeast African layer + later historic Arabian input.

u/electivire24 — 20 hours ago