







Masjid al-Haram is the largest mosque in the world, spanning vast multi-level courtyards and prayer halls that accommodate millions of worshippers, uniquely expanded by carving into the surrounding mountains of Makkah, and housing one of the biggest air-conditioned spaces on Earth to keep pilgrims comfortable despite the extreme desert heat.
Its behaving erratically, it is speeding up for no apparent reason, making weird noises, and repeatedly bumping into things without stopping.
Let me actually explain what I mean by this question:
I've been thinking about this a lot lately and want to hear from people who study this stuff.
New York City is something special. Not in a tourist brochure way, in a real, observable urban design sense. Rowhomes next to high-rises. Alleyways with actual character. A different view every half block. Ethnic enclaves that have been layering over each other for 150 years, each one leaving something behind: a food, a sound, a block that looks like nowhere else. Even the rough neighborhoods are part of the texture. You can feel the weight of history just walking through parts of the Bronx or Jackson Heights. That's not a flaw, that's the point. It's beautiful, complex, chaotic, and it somehow works.
But the second you leave the five boroughs, it evaporates.
I mean it. It's almost geographically violent how fast it disappears. Drive north on the Saw Mill or Hutchinson Parkway and the moment you cross into Westchester the street lamps dissappear, the density collapses, and you're suddenly in miles of predictable suburban landscape. Manicured, quiet, lifeless. Cross the George Washington Bridge and the 12-lane NJ Turnpike is a complete contrast to what's right on the other side of that river. Central Jersey is just stroad after stroad, the same Walmart and strip mall corridor repeated endlessly. Connecticut has genuine historic bones in places but zero connective tissue: isolated town centers drowning in parking lots with nothing in between.
What kills me is the identity thing. Everyone in the NYC metro area has some part of their identity tied to the city. "I'm from New York" usually means you're from somewhere an hour away with a Target and a Chili's. No one says they're from Danbury CT or Union, NJ, not because those people aren't proud, but because those places don't register. They look like everywhere else in America. No flag to plant.
I live 60 miles from Manhattan. That sounds close. Its not. I'm not commuting there. I'm not catching a show or game every week. It's an occasional day trip to remind myself what an actual city feels like. The proximity isn't a flex when your day-to-day reality is the gym, the mall, the same big box stores you could find in suburban Ohio or suburban Texas. "You're so close to NYC" is cold comfort when you're actually living it.
Here's what frustrates me from an urban planning perspective: If you compare the full metro, The NYC "metro area" is laughably bad compared to its european counterparts. The outskirts of Paris are denser, more transit-connected, and have more neighborhood identity than most of Westchester. London absorbed dozens of villages over centuries and let them keep their character.
It's seriously as if for the past 100 years or so, society collectively decided to build a perfect utopia and development pattern only within the 5 boroughs, and everything else outside the city wasn't their problem. That just makes me sad.
So this isn't really my choice, my family is looking at relocating to the Dallas metroplex; mainly for work opportunities, more diverse communities (specifically the significant south asian/muslim community there), and relatively cheaper housing. I Figured I'd ask the people who actually live there to see what the deal is.
I've heard a bunch of things about DFW sprawl, infinite suburbs, traffic, and poor weather. But here's the thing, I live in Connecticut and I'm already dealing with most of that. CT is this weird car-dependent suburban sprawl where everything is spread out, nothing is walkable, and your daily rotation is college, the gym, the mall, and the same big box stores that exist everywhere else. It's all strip malls and state routes with no real identity between them. I'll admit some of the older downtowns have character and the nature is "nice", it's just trees and rivers and the best of spring and fall lasts like 2 weeks. Not exactly a reason to build your life somewhere. The whole upstate NY region around us is just as bleak, so it's not like there's anything vibrant nearby making up for it.
Before you say "but you're so close to NYC", I don't work there, I'm not commuting there, it's just an occasional visit at best. It's not the flex people think it is when you're actually living out here day to day.
And the traffic here is already crippling. The interstates and parkways are dense and narrow, and the city roads aren't any better. So it's not like I'd be going from some smooth-driving paradise to Dallas gridlock. I'm already sitting in it, just with less to show for it when I get where I'm going.
So if I'm already living the car-centric lifestyle with nothing to do, does Dallas at least upgrade that experience? More food options, more stuff going on, more energy in general? Or am I just trading one kind of sprawl for another with worse humidity?
Not looking for the "Dallas is perfect" pitch — just want real talk from people who live there. What should I know?
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post