Torn between SGUL and UEA - insight needed!
I have offers for Graduate Entry Medicine at both St George's and UEA, and I'm torn. Hoping for some perspective from current/former students at either, or anyone who's been in a similar spot.
Background:
- Did my undergrad in London
- From SE England, so SGUL is closer to home and I still have friends in London
- Want to go into surgery - perhaps orthopaedics (not set in stone)
I was originally pretty set on SGUL. The trauma centre exposure felt huge given my surgical interest, plus the practical benefits of being close to home and having a built-in social network. After doing more digging on UEA, I came away really impressed with how thoughtfully they've designed the course around their students and now I'm reconsidering.
Pros for UEA:
- Spiral curriculum (which I prefer)
- HCA training and the ability to do bank shifts from year 1
- Strong support structure across all 4 years
- 3rd in the GMC survey for foundation programme prep
- Free residential accommodation for placements outside Norwich and cheap transport
- Much cheaper rent
- Large regional teaching hospital in NNUH
- Help in portfolio building from first year
- 24/7 access for OSCE practice
Pros for SGUL:
- Major trauma centre on-site
- Wider and more varied case mix from a London tertiary population
- VSLO-certified - US electives accessible via the AAMC system
- Flinders University (Adelaide) exchange for Australia
- Closer to home + can live with undergrad friends
- More tertiary specialty exposure for surgery
- Established reputation for producing surgical trainees
Any thoughts welcome, particularly from anyone who's gone into surgery from either school, or who chose between similar trade-offs. Cheers.