u/Wild-Register992

Redefining how learning is still stuck at completion rates
▲ 3 r/lmsops+1 crossposts

Redefining how learning is still stuck at completion rates

Hey everyone!
I'm working on a platform - Lyearn, that ideologically differs from what traditional learning tools used to offer that is, consume a content and you're done. It's way beyond broken given there's no point of learning when you can't apply a specific skill or you can't find out whether the learning actually helped?

The phase 1 is already up and running. It's the phase 2 that's interesting which offers an intelligence layer on top the tools one uses in their workplace and gives them insights to achieve maximum efficiency.

I would love to hear your thoughts on the idea.

Here's the link to website:
https://www.lyearn.com/

u/Wild-Register992 — 5 hours ago

Looking to improve engagement rate on my website

Hey everyone!
I've been working on my website's traffic and trying to push it upwards. There's been a considerable uptick in the traffic however the engagement rate has hit rockbottom and needs urgent fixing.

Seeking advice on how do you find out issues related to engagement rate and fix them?

reddit.com
u/Wild-Register992 — 3 days ago
▲ 1 r/lmsops

For years, L&D has been stuck with the thought of completion rates as a benchmarking for ROI of any tool associated with L&D, specifically an LMS.
But are completion rates truly reflective of success? Honestly, no.

Even if a learner completes a specific module or a path, it wouldn't matter unless they actually use the skills they learnt. That is why, I feel instead of completion rates a better framework would be measuring the skill application.

Think of it this way, an intelligence layer that sits on top of your tools to understand your pre vs post working patterns/behaviour and flags if learning has actually translated to outcome.

Would love to hear your thoughts on the same :)

reddit.com
u/Wild-Register992 — 6 days ago
▲ 5 r/lmsops

Hey everyone!
I've been trying to understand the use cases of AI within an LMS in terms of it's efficiency, effectiveness and diversity.

Given the AI trend, most LMS tools are now moving to have an added AI layer on top of their LMS which usually works for:

  1. Content Authoring
  2. Knowledge Bank

But is AI useful for just 2 of these use cases? I've been spotting a trend of LMS moving towards "Skill-Gap Analysis" which effectively means understanding which skills needs re-training or first-time introduction.

How does the LMS you guys use solve your use cases using AI? How do you measure the effectiveness?

reddit.com
u/Wild-Register992 — 9 days ago