
May 13, 1946 Nuremberg Tribunal Day 128: Grand Admiral Karl Doenitz's Defense Lawyer "Kranzbuehler broke the tension of cross-examination by introducing a number of documents helpful to the admirals ' cause and then called three witnesses.
In order they were Admiral Gerhard Wagner, who from the beginning of the war until 1944 had been a member of the Naval Operations Staff and from then to the end of the war a special assistant to Doenitz . . .
Kranzbuehler's principal purpose in calling these witnesses was to confute the testimony given earlier by Lieutenant Peter Heisig and Lieutenant Commander Moehle to the effect (in Heisig's case) that Doenitz, in a speech to a large group of U-boat officers in the fall of 1942 and (in Moehle' s case) in the order of September 17, 1942, had approved shooting the survivors of ships sunk by U-boats. Wagner, Godt, and Hessler all denied that there was any basis for the charge and faced sharp cross-examination from Phillimore, who had previously called Heisig and Moehle as witnesses for the prosecution. ...
The other topic, which engaged the witness Wagner, was the Commando Order, which Doenitz had sloughed off as a question of reprisal and with which he denied having any connection. The prosecution had intrduced documents concerning the capture, on a Norwegian island in the summer of 1943, of the uniformed crew of a Norwegian torpedo boat.
According to the documents, the crew members were interrogated by subordinates of Otto von Schrader, Commanding Admiral of the Norwegian West Coast. The Admiral turned them over to the SD, who shot them pursuant to the Commando Order.
Doenitz denied knowledge of the matter despite sharp and disbelieving pressure by Fyfe on cross-examination. Wagner emphatically corroborated Doenitz' s lack of information and added that he himself had learned of the incident for the first time at Nuremberg .
His reward was a protracted and accusatory cross-examination by Phillimore, who argued forcefully that such an episode must have been reported to Doenitz' s headquarters, and this argument appeared to discredit Wagner' s confused denials.
But later development s cleared Doenitz of responsibility; Schrader was a naval officer, but he was a military area commander and therefore reported not to Doenitz but to General Nikolaus von Falkenhorst, Wehrmacht Commander of Norway."
From The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Irials: A Personal Memoir", by Telford Taylor.
Kranzbuhler: What was the relationship between the Naval Operations Staff and the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces, the OKW?
Wagner: The OKW passed on the instructions and orders of Hitler, who was the Supreme Commander of the Armed Forces, regarding the conduct of the war; usually, as far as naval warfare particularly was concerned, after examination and review by the Naval Operations Staff. General questions of the conduct of the war were decided without previous consultations with members of the Naval Operations Staff.
Kranzbuhler: In which manner were the preparations of the High Command of the Navy for a possible war carried out?
Wagner: Generally speaking, they consisted of mobilization preparations, tactical training, and strategic considerations for the event of a possible conflict.
Kranzbuhler: Did the Naval Operations Staff during your time receive an order to prepare for a definite possibility of war?
Wagner: The first instance was the order for "Case White," the war against Poland. Before that, only tasks regarding security measures were given us.
FULL TRANSCRIPT: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/imt/05-13-46.asp#wagner
NOT MY LINKS
VIDEO - ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCxBZm53\_o4
Note: As always, these excerpts from trial testimony should not necessarily be mistaken for fact, and in fact are often bold-faced lies. It should be kept in mind that they are the sometimes-desperate statements of hard-pressed defendants seeking to avoid culpability and shift responsibility from charges that—should they be found guilty—could possibly be punishable by death. -W
CONTEXT: http://propagander2.tripod.com/d04.html
NOT MY LINKS
The Nuremberg Defendants: http://4rs.neocities.org/index.html
1: Julius B.Stafford-Baker Nuremberg 10/1/46 - "The interior of a wood-panelled courtroom seen from the visitor's gallery. The accused are seated on the left, in a box in front of a row of US military police. There are a group of lawyers sitting in rows in front of them, and the judges sit out of the frame to the right. Most of the men in the image are wearing earphones.
From left to right the men in the box are Admiral Karl Doenitz (wearing dark glasses), Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel and Alfred Jödl. Hermann Goering is in the front row, with his face half obscured by the back of an American policeman wearing light grey uniform. The black hair just above Goering's head belongs to Rudolf Hess. The other five in the box are Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walther Funk and Hjalmar Schacht."