u/Upstairs-Visit-3090

Your emails don’t fail after sending. They fail before.

Your emails don’t fail after sending. They fail before.

Built a pre send risk layer tool.

Paste email → it flags: CTA pressure

link patterns

sender signals

hidden spam triggers

Then tells what to fix + rewrites.

Not warmup. Not spam score.

Need real feedback.

If you send cold emails, test it and tell me what’s wrong.

inbox guard

u/Upstairs-Visit-3090 — 11 hours ago
Your "First 50 Users" outreach is likely hitting the Spam folder. Let me scan it for free. 🛡️
▲ 4 r/SideProject+2 crossposts

Your "First 50 Users" outreach is likely hitting the Spam folder. Let me scan it for free. 🛡️

Seeing a great launch fail because of a 'Spam Trap' is heartbreaking.

Google and Outlook now use AI to flag 'Broadcast Tone' that founders cannot see. I built InboxGuard as a pre-send risk engine to give you a technical x-ray before you hit send.

Since I am at $0 MRR, I am giving a Lifetime Free Plan to the first 10 founders here.

Run a 60-second scan: tool

I am jumping into 3 products from this thread now to give technical feedback on their deliverability flow!

u/Upstairs-Visit-3090 — 20 hours ago

I built something to catch why cold emails fail before sending, would you use this?

so i kept running into the same problem with cold email you send a batch, wait, then realize something was off

like:

generic sender name too many links weird CTA pressure bad list segments and by the time you notice, you’ve already hurt your domain or wasted a test most tools tell you a “score” after the fact but they don’t actually tell you what is going to break before you hit send

so i started building something for that basically:

you paste your email → it flags the exact things that could hurt deliverability or replies before sending not replacing seed testing just catching obvious mistakes early so fewer bad drafts reach that stage

reddit.com
u/Upstairs-Visit-3090 — 1 day ago