u/Upbeat_Effective_342

Having returned to school five quarters ago, I have once again found myself in career indecision crisis mode. Whenever this happens, I eventually find myself wandering through 80,000 Hours. It's fun to see what's evolved over the years, and what's verbatim from last time I ended up there.

My number one question is why number two on their shortlist of causes today is AI-enabled extreme power concentration

In the neglectedness evaluation, they write:

> Lots of people are working on power concentration generally, in governments, the legal system, academia, and civil society.

This perspective makes me feel like I'm missing something. I guess there's the Bernie Sanders/Alexandria Ocasio Cortez tag team, and Occupy Wallstreet was a thing for a while back in the before-fore times. There are the land value tax people, and the progressive tax brackets like we had back before Reagan people. But I'm having trouble finding a locus of this effort that makes me think, yeah, enough people are working on this effectively to where more folks taking up the cause will have less impact on the margin than "bearing risks of AI takeover in mind" or even writing speculatively about what AI takeover might look like.

Does anybody have their finger on the pulse of an unusually promising approach to power redistribution? Or just two cents on the issue?

My second question arose from casually listening to Explosions&Fire beautifully articulate the utter hogwash that is academic publishing in this latest upload. It made me so hopping mad to be reminded of that obscenity. I used to dream of becoming an academic, but I just couldn't see the point in going that route when ending the journal stranglehold on publicly funded information was clearly so much more important than feeding it another structurally compromised PDF. Do any of you remember Lucina Uddin's class action lawsuit from 2024? Is anyone else working on this problem besides her?