Scrubgrass, PA Site Analysis
Hey everyone,
We just posted our final site research analysis for KEEL for now!
We hope you have enjoyed this series and gotten a lot of value and understanding of where Keel is at in its developmental pipeline.
If you want to stick around for more of our AI infrastructure research, consider checking out our free newsletter for weekly updates. We will have more Keel reporting in the future!
We will also be updating our full model and forecast shortly after earnings.
Scrubgrass is a 750-acre site in Venango County, Pennsylvania, with options on an additional 1,100 acres.
The land carries an industrial legacy that creates an unusual starting position.
An 85 MW waste coal generating plant from the original buildout, a Stronghold-era bitcoin mining phase that proved on-site compute could operate continuously, and a Bitfarms acquisition that consolidated ownership before redomiciling and rebranding as Keel Infrastructure in early 2026.
The site holds 63 MW of secured grid capacity today, inherited from the legacy plant and existing FirstEnergy interconnection.
FirstEnergy is currently processing an active load study for an additional 750 MW, with visibility expected in the second half of 2026.
That study is not firm capacity. It sits in the pipeline category until it converts to an executed Electricity Service Agreement.
Separate from grid expansion, Keel is evaluating a 550 MW behind-the-meter natural gas plant using combined-cycle gas turbines.
The site sits near the Tennessee Gas Pipeline Zone 4 200 Line trading hub, providing direct access to competitively priced fuel.
If both the 750 MW grid study and the 550 MW gas option advance, the site's theoretical ceiling approaches 1,363 MW, large enough to qualify as a genuine gigacampus.
The most visible environmental overhang is the legacy coal ash pile.
A March 2025 settlement with Earthjustice requires Keel, through the Scrubgrass Reclamation Company, to complete removal by September 2026, a deadline accelerated 14 months from the original regulatory schedule.
A January 2025 FERC settlement also closed out approximately $1.4 million in penalties tied to Stronghold-era market violations between 2021 and 2022.
PJM matters structurally. The grid is facing a supply-demand imbalance driven by traditional generation retirements and surging data center demand concentrated in markets like Northern Virginia.
Available, interconnected power within PJM has become scarce. Sites with grid access and expansion room sit in a meaningfully different competitive position than comparable acreage outside the constrained zone.
The financing model is the powered shell with credit-wrapped lease structures. Keel signs a long-term lease with an investment-grade or near-investment-grade tenant, then uses that contracted cash flow to secure project-level financing.
What the market is missing and why this site matters
The bottleneck in AI infrastructure is power delivery.
Grid queue timelines in many U.S. markets stretch beyond five years for new interconnection requests, and available power in core PJM markets is increasingly spoken for.
Sites that already hold grid-connected capacity, industrial zoning, transmission infrastructure, and pipeline access skip a meaningful portion of that timeline.
Scrubgrass holds an unusual combination of those ingredients.
Most coverage either treats the site as a legacy waste coal asset that may eventually pivot, or extrapolates the full 1,363 MW ceiling as if it were already firm capacity.
Both framings collapse a real conditional opportunity into a single point estimate.
The site's actual position sits in the middle. 63 MW of operational capacity is real.
The 750 MW load study is credible given the existing FirstEnergy relationship and interconnection, but it is not yet firm.
The 550 MW gas plant is real optionality given confirmed pipeline proximity, but turbine selection, permitting, and capital commitments remain in evaluation.
The cleanup is on an accelerated schedule that has to land on time. None of these are speculative. None of them are settled either.
This is where the report does its work. It separates secured capacity from pipeline capacity from optionality.
It traces how the site got to its current starting position, what each phase of ownership left behind, and why the FERC enforcement history matters for how future co-location must be structured.
It maps the customer fit between hyperscaler deployment requirements and neo-cloud powered-shell economics, and it explains why western Pennsylvania latency to northeastern population centers becomes more relevant as AI deployment shifts toward inference.
Three things make this worth tracking. The starting position is genuinely difficult to replicate from scratch.
Power access, land scale, PJM location, and gas pipeline proximity are individually valuable and collectively rare.
The path forward is legible with specific milestones that can be observed over the next 12 to 18 months. And the financing mechanism does not require Keel to self-fund. It requires a creditworthy anchor tenant to make the capital stack work.
The risks are equally specific. The load study may not convert to firm capacity on the implied timeline.
The gas option may stall in permitting.
Cleanup slippage past September 2026 would create institutional diligence problems.
The absence of a publicly announced anchor tenant means the lease-driven financing model remains theoretical.
And FERC enforcement history requires that any future co-location maintain clear physical and contractual separation between generation and data center loads.
Scrubgrass is one of the more interesting raw setups in the AI infrastructure transition pipeline.
Whether the ceiling gets reached depends on execution across several fronts in a compressed timeline.
The next 12 to 18 months will determine whether the site becomes a credible AI campus or remains an unusual collection of unrealized inputs.