u/TradingMath

Experiencing max DD

I need some help with my strategy.

So my strategy has these stats:

Win Ratio : 31.23%

Average R:R : 2.974

Expectancy : 0.241 (including assumed 14% trading costs and slippages, a question in itself 😅)

Max DD: 30.49 R

Stats on backtested 776 trades.

I have an algo programmed which takes these trades.

Three options I have to calculate position sizing:

  1. According to max DD: 100/Max DD and further divided by two for safety which works out to 1.64%

  2. According to Risk of Ruin (<0.3%) : 2.5%

  3. According to Kelly’s criterion (divided by 4): 2.03%

Earlier I was risking 3% because the max DD was lower before. Currently I’m risking 2.5% on my running account balance.

My problems are:

  1. I’m experiencing the Max DD currently and everything seems gloomy.

  2. Even though the loss is not much in R terms, the loss is greater in $$. Meaning if I get a 20R trade, I will be probably be up by R a lot, but in $$ I will probably not even break even because of reduced $ risk per trade.

Should I just continue considering the sample size is good enough to have an edge?

Should I risk fixed % of initial capital or running capital balance?

reddit.com
u/TradingMath — 19 hours ago

Experiencing Max DD

I need some help with my strategy.

So my strategy has these stats:

Win Ratio : 31.23%

Average R:R : 2.974

Expectancy : 0.241 (including assumed 14% trading costs and slippages, a question in itself 😅)

Max DD: 30.49 R

Stats on backtested 776 trades.

I have an algo programmed which takes these trades.

Three options I have to calculate position sizing:

  1. According to max DD: 100/Max DD and further divided by two for safety which works out to 1.64%

  2. According to Risk of Ruin (<0.3%) : 2.5%

  3. According to Kelly’s criterion (divided by 4): 2.03%

Earlier I was risking 3% because the max DD was lower before. Currently I’m risking 2.5% on my running account balance.

My problems are:

  1. I’m experiencing the Max DD currently and everything seems gloomy.

  2. Even though the loss is not much in R terms, the loss is greater in $$. Meaning if I get a 20R trade, I will be probably be up by R a lot, but in $$ I will probably not even break even because of reduced $ risk per trade.

Should I just continue considering the sample size is good enough to have an edge?

Should I risk fixed % of initial capital or running capital balance?

reddit.com
u/TradingMath — 19 hours ago